The authors study determinants of market organization of local public services by an examination of one of the most visible services, residentialwaste management. Using a multinomial logit model and data for 1,000 U.S. communities, the authors explore the effects of political influence, voter ideology, environmental constraints, production costs, and contracting transaction costs on a community’s choice of service delivery options. They find that costs are significant in explaining communities’ choices. In contrast, few of the political variables are statistically significant. These results hold for both waste and recycling, providing further evidence that local governments emphasize costs when choosing between private and public provision.
Becker, Gary. 1983. A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics98:371-400.
2.
Bel, Germá, and Antonio Miralles. 2003. Factors influencing the privatisation of urban solid waste collection in Spain. Urban Studies40 (7): 1323-1334.
3.
Boycko, M., Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1996. A theory of privatization. Economic Journal106:309-319.
4.
Callan, Scott J., and Janet Thomas. 2001. Economies of scale and scope: A cost analysis of municipal solid waste services. Land Economics77 (4): 548-560.
5.
Carroll, Wayne. 1995. The organization and efficiency of residential recycling services. Eastern Economic Journal21 (2): 215-225.
6.
Cuyahoga County Planning Commission. n.d. Land area and population density: Cuyahoga County communities and seven county region. http://planning.co.cuyahoga.oh.us/census/land.html (accessed 13 December 2004).
7.
Demsetz, Harold. 1968. Why regulate utilities?Journal of Law and Economics9:55-66.
8.
Dubin, Jeffrey, and Peter Navarro. 1988. How markets for impure public goods organize: The case of household refuse collection. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization4 (2): 217-241.
9.
Edlin, Aaron, and Benjamin Hermalin. 2000. Contract renegotiation and options in agency problems. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization16 (2): 395-423.
10.
Edwards, F., and Barbara Stevens. 1978. The provision of municipal sanitation services by private firms: Anempirical analysis of the efficiency of alternative market structures and regulatory arrangements. Journal of Industrial Economics27 (2): 133-147.
11.
Ferris, James. 1986. The decision to contract out: An empirical analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly22 (2): 289-311.
Grossman, Sanford, and Oliver Hart. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: Atheory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy94 (4): 691-719.
Hart, Oliver, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1997. The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics112 (4): 1127-1161. http://planning.co.cuyahoga.oh.us/census/land.html.
16.
International City/County Management Association (ICMA). 1995. Solid waste collection and disposal survey. http://www.icma.org/main/sc.asp?t=0.
17.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. 1993. Census of governments, 1987: Employment statistics. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
18.
Kemper, Peter, and John Quigley. 1976. The economics of refuse collection. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19.
Kinnaman, Thomas C., and Don Fullerton. 2000. Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy. Journal of Urban Economics48:419-442.
20.
Klein, Benjamin, Robert Crawford, and Armen Alchian. 1978. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics21 (2): 297-326.
21.
Leip, David. 2001. David Leip’s atlas of U.S. presidential elections. http://www.uselectionatlas.org.
22.
López-de-Silanes, Florencio, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1997. Privatization in the United States. Rand Journal of Economics28 (3): 447-471.
23.
Nelson, Michael. 1997. Municipal government approaches to service delivery: An analysis from a transactions cost perspective. Economic Inquiry35 (1): 82-96.
24.
Savas, Eugene. 1977. Policy analysis for local government: Public vs. private refuse collection. Policy Analysis3 (1): 49-74.
25.
Savas, Eugene. 1981. Intracity competition between public and private service delivery. Public Administration Review41 (1): 46-52.
26.
Steuteville, Robert. 1995. The state of garbage in America: Part II. Bio Cycle36 (5): 30-37.
27.
Steuteville, Robert, Nora Goldstein, and Kurt Grotz. 1993. The state of garbage in America: Part II. Bio Cycle34 (6): 32-37.
28.
Stevens, Barbara J.1978. Scale, market structure, and the cost of refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics60 (3): 438-448.
29.
Stigler, George. 1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics2:3-21.
30.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (USACIR). 1993. State laws governing local government structure and administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1990. 1990 county subdivisions. Cartographic boundary files. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/cs1990.html.
32.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1991. Census of governments, 1987: Employment statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
33.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1992. Census of population and housing, 1990: Summary tape file 3A. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
34.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000. Population estimates for states, counties, places, and MCDs: Annual time series, 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census. http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/2000s/vintage_2002.
35.
Walls, Margaret, Molly Macauley, and Soren Anderson. 2003. The organization of local solid waste and recycling markets: Public and private provision of services. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 02-35REV, November. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
36.
Williamson, Oliver E.1979. Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relationships. Journal of Law and Economics22:233-261.
37.
Williamson, Oliver E.1999. Public and private bureaucracies: Atransaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization15 (1): 306-342.
