Thirteen states in the United States have adopted state growth management legislation that aims to preserve environmentally sensitive areas, improve the quality of urban areas, and reduce urban sprawl. Although there is a considerable amount of literature describing such policies, there is very little that examines the effectiveness of such policies. The author researched the efficacy of state growth management laws in controlling urban sprawl by examining the change in urban densities in 49 states over a 15-year period. He found that growth-managed states generally experienced a lesser density decline than states without growth management. However, regression analysis revealed that state growth management programs did not have a statistically significant effect in checking sprawl. The author concludes with several suggestions for modifying state regulations to curb sprawl more effectively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bollens, S. 1992. State growth management: Inter-governmental frameworks and policy objectives. Journal of the American Planning Association58:454-466.
2.
Bosselman, F., and D. L. Callies. 1971. The quiet revolution in land use control. Washington, DC: Council on Environmental Quality and Council of State Governments.
3.
Burchell, R. W. 1997. Economic and fiscal costs (and benefits) of sprawl. The Urban Lawyer29:159-180.
4.
Callies, D. L. 1992. Dealing with scarcity: Land use and planning. In Politics and public policy, edited by Z. A. Smith and R. Pratt, 130-145. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
Coughlin, R. E. 1991. Formulating and evaluating agricultural zoning programs. Journal of the American Planning Association57:183-192.
6.
DeGrove, J. 1984. Land, growth and politics. Chicago: Planners Press.
7.
DeGrove, J. 1989. Florida’s greatest challenge: Managing massive growth. In Implementation of the 1985 Growth Management Act: From planning to development regulations, edited by B. Brumback and M. J. Marvin, 1-8. Fort Lauderdale, FL: FAU/FIU Center for the Study of Environmental Problems.
8.
Downs, A. 1999. Some realities about sprawl and urban decline. Housing Policy Debate10:955-974.
9.
Ewing, R. 1994. Characteristics, causes and effects of sprawl: Aliterature review. Environmental and Urban Issues21:1-15.
10.
Fisher, R. 1994. State and local public finance. Chicago: Irwin Publishers.
11.
Gale, D. 1992. Eight state sponsored growth management programs—A comparative analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association58:425-439.
12.
Galster, G., R. Hanson, M. Ratcliffe, H. Wolman, S. Coleman, and J. Freihage. 2001. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate12:681-718.
13.
Goldsmith, W. 1999. Resisting the reality of race: Land use and social justice in the metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14.
Gordon, P., and H. Richardson. 2000. Critiquing sprawl’s critics(Cato Policy Analysis No. 365). Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
15.
Governor’s Commission on Vermont’s Future. 1988. Report of the Governor’s Commission on Vermont’s Future: Guidelines for growth. Montpelier: State of Vermont.
16.
Healy, R. G., and J. S. Rosenberg. 1979. Land use and the states. 2d ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
Kahn, M. 2001. Has sprawl reduced the Black/White consumption gap? Housing Policy Debate12:77-86.
18.
Kasowski, K. 1991. Oregon: Fifteen years of land use planning. In Balanced growth: A planning guide for local government, edited by J. DeGrove, 125–129. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
19.
Kelly, E. D. 1993. Managing community growth—Policies, techniques and impacts. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20.
Ketcham, P., and S. Seigal. 1991. Managing growth to promote affordable housing: Revisiting Oregon’s goal 10. Portland, OR: 1000 Friends of Oregon.
21.
Kozel, G., and S. French. 2000. Nations governors see smart growth as a major issue. Preservation frontline. Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation.
22.
Levy, J. 1994. Contemporary urban planning. 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Lopez, R., and H. P. Hynes. 2003. Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, distribution and trends. Urban Affairs Review38:325-355.
24.
Moore, T., and A. C. Nelson. 1994. Lessons for effective urban-containment and resource-land preservation policy. Journal of Urban Planning and Development12:157-171.
25.
Nelson, A. C. 1999. Comparing states with and without growth management regulations based on indicators with policy implications. Land Use Policy16:121-127.
26.
Nelson, A. C., J. Duncan, C. Mullen, and K. Bishop. 1995. Growth management: Principles and practices. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
Pelham, T. 1992. Adequate public facilities requirements: Reflections on Florida’s concurrency system for managing growth. Florida State University Law Review19:973-1052.
29.
Pendall, R. 1999. Doland use controls cause sprawl? Environment and PlanningB26:555-571.
30.
Pendall, R., W. Fulton, and A. Harrison. 2000. Losing ground to sprawl? Density trends in metropolitan America. Paper presented at the Fair Growth: Connecting Sprawl, Smart Growth and Social Equity conference organized by the Fannie Mae Foundation and the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, November, in Atlanta, GA.
31.
Porter, D. 1997. Managing growth in America’s communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
32.
Salkin, P. 1999. Smart growth at century’s end: The state of the states. Albany, NY: Government Law Center of the Albany Law School.
Squires, G., ed. 2002. Urban sprawl—Causes, consequences and policy responses. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
37.
Staley, S. 1999. The sprawling of America: In defense of the dynamic city. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
38.
Steiner, F. 1994. Sprawl can be good. Planning60:14-17.
39.
Steiner, R. 1998. Does transportation concurrency ensure adequate transportation facilities? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, November, in Pasadena, CA.
40.
Weitz, J. 1999. From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. Journal of Planning Literature14:267-338.
