Natural disasters can result in releases of toxic materials that pose a grave threat to populations exposed to them. The authors provide evidence from California and Louisiana to show that in comparison with homeowners, renters are significantly less well prepared to survive a joint naturaland technologicaldisaster without injury. Rentalhousing can be targeted for public awareness and other measures that can improve the preparedness of tenants, but barriers that inhibit progress are substantial. Nevertheless, with a carefully crafted plan of action based on a variety of policy instruments, the tenure trap can be disabled.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American IndustrialHygiene Association. 1999. 1999 ERPGs/WEELs handbook. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
2.
American Society of CivilEngineers. 1998. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
3.
Association of Bay Area Governments. 1992. Seismic retrofit incentive programs: A handbook for local governments. Oakland, CA: Association of Bay Area Governments.
4.
Blair-Tyler, M., and P. Gregory. 1990. Strengthening unreinforced masonry buildings in Los Angeles: Land use and occupancy impacts of the LA seismic ordinance. Portola Valley, CA: William Spangle and Associates, Inc.
5.
Comerio, M. 1998. Disaster hits home: New policy for urban housing recovery. Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.
6.
Covello, V. T., P. Slovic, and D. von Winterfeldt. 1987. Risk communication: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
7.
Cruz, A. M., L. J. Steinberg, and R. Luna. 2001. Identifying hurricane-induced hazardous materials release scenarios in a petroleum refinery. Natural Hazards Review2 (4): 203-210.
8.
Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 1998. Incentives and impediments to improving the seismic performance of buildings. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
10.
Enarson, E., and B. H. Morrow, eds. 1998. The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women's eyes. Westport, CT: Praeger.
11.
Enders, J. 2001. Measuring community awareness and preparedness for emergencies. Australian Journal of Emergency Management16 (3): 52-58.
12.
Faupel, C. E., S. P. Kelley, and T. Petee. 1992. The impact of disaster education on household preparedness for Hurricane Hugo. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters10:5-24.
13.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2002. Hazard mitigation grant program. Accessed 12 December 2002 via the World Wide Web: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/hazmit.pdf
14.
Feldman, J., and M. K. Lindell. 1990. On rationality. In Recent economic thought: Organization and decision theory, edited by I. Horowitz, 83-164. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
15.
Fothergill, A., E. G. M. Maestas, and J. D. Darlington. 1999. Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters23 (2): 156-173.
16.
Goldman, C. A., K. M. Greely, and J. P. Harris. 1988. Retrofit experience in U.S. multifamily buildings: Energy savings, costs, and economics. Energy12 (11): 797-811.
17.
International Code Council. 2000. 2000 international building code, ICC. Falls Church, VA: International Conference of Building Officials.
18.
Katrakis, J. T., P. A. Knight, and J. D. Cavallo. 1994. Energy-efficient rehabilitation of multifamily buildings in the Midwest. Report ANL/DIS/TM-16, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
19.
Lee, A. D., R. I. Chin, and C. L. Marden. 1995. Affordable housing: Reducing the energy cost burden. Report PNL-10372, UC-350, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA.
20.
Levine, J. N. 2002. Shake, rattle and rain-out: Emergency planning in the face of conjoint hazards. New Orleans, LA: Department of Civil Engineering, Tulane University.
21.
Lindell, M. K., and R. W. Perry. 1992. Behavioral foundations of community emergency management. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
22.
Lindell, M. K., and R. W. Perry. 1997. Hazardous materials releases in the Northridge earthquake: Implications for seismic risk assessment. Risk Analysis17 (2): 147-156.
23.
Lindell, M. K., and C. S. Prater. 2000. Household adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: A comparison of residents in two states. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters18:317-338.
24.
Lunsford, D. 2000. The Triad Alliance: Preparing vulnerable populations. Public Management, October, 17-19.
25.
M and M Protection Consultants. 1997. Large property damage losses in the hydrocarbon chemical industries: A thirty-year review. New York: Author.
26.
May, P. J., R. J. Burby, and H. Kunreuther. 1998. Policy design for earthquake hazard mitigation. Earthquake Spectra14 (4): 629-650.
27.
Mileti, D. S. 1999. Disasters by design. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry/NationalAcademy Press.
28.
Mileti, D. S., and J. D. Darlington. 1995. Societal response to revised earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters13:119-145.
29.
Morrow, B. H. 1999. Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters23 (1): 1-18.
30.
NationalInstitute for ChemicalStudies. 2001. Sheltering in place as a public protective action. Charleston, WV: Author.
31.
Palm, R. 1995. Earthquake insurance: A longitudinal study of California homeowners. Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
Pijawka, K. D., B. A. Cuthbertson, and R. S. Olson. 1987-1988. Coping with extreme hazard events: Emerging themes in naturaland technologicaldisaster research. Omega18:281-297.
33.
Reitherman, R. K. 1982. Earthquake-caused hazardous materialreleases. Paper presented at the Hazardous Material Spills Conference, April, Milwaukee, WI.
34.
Rogers, G. O., A. P. Watson, J. H. Sorensen, R. D. Sharp, and S. A. Carnes. 1990. Evaluating protective actions for chemicalagent emergencies. Report ORNL-6615, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
35.
Rosenbaum, E. 1996. Racial/ethnic differences in home ownership and housing quality, 1991. Social Problems43 (4): 403-426.
36.
Russell, L. A., J. D. Goltz, and L. B. Bourque. 1995. Preparedness and hazard mitigation activities before and after two earthquakes. Environment and Behavior27:744-770.
37.
Showalter, P. S., and M. F. Myers. 1994. Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or technological materials between 1980-9: Analysis and recommendations. Risk Analysis14 (2): 169-181.
38.
Simile, C. 1995. Disaster settings and mobilization for contentious collective action: Case studies of hurricane Hugo and the Loma Prieta earthquake. Ph.D. diss., Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark.
39.
Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science198:280-285.
40.
Steinberg, L. J., V. Basolo, R. J. Burby, J. N. Levine, and A. M. Cruz. 2002. Earthquake-induced technological disasters: A case study of possible effects and emergency response in the urban environment. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, MA, July 21-25, 2002. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
41.
Steinberg, L. J., A. M. Cruz, F. Vardar-Sukan, and Y. Ersoz. 2001. Hazardous materials releases during the August 17, 1999 earthquake in Turkey. In Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Conference, Orlando, May 2001. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
42.
Stern, P. C., E. Aronson, J. M. Darley, W. Kempton, D. H. Hill, E. Hirst, and T. J. Wilbanks. 1987. Answering behavioralquestions about energy efficiency in buildings. Energy12 (5): 339-353.
43.
Tierney, K. J., M. K. Lindell, and R. W. Perry. 2001. Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
44.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science185:1124-1232.
45.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1992. Occupational safety and health guideline for ammonia. Washington, DC: Author.
46.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2002. Rehabilitation mortgage insurance (Section 203(k)). Accessed 6 June 2002 via the World Wide Web: http://www.hud.gov/progdesc/203k—df.cfm
Varone, F., and B. Aebischer. 2001. Energy efficiency: The challenges of policy design. Energy Policy29:615-629.
49.
Vine, E. L., B. K. Barnes, E. Mills, and R. R. Ritschard. 1989. The response of low-income elderly to tenant incentive programs. Energy14 (11): 677-684.
50.
Wilkinson, S. J., and C. Goodacre. 2002. Promoting energy efficiency in the private rented sector. Property Management29 (1): 49-63.
