How do the socially reproductive functions of local government fare within municipalities that adopt “entrepreneurial” economic development practices? This article examines the case of tax increment financing (TIF), a quintessentially entrepreneurial strategy whose use has significant fiscal implications for the overlapping taxing jurisdictions that provide these functions. Statistical analysis of TIF's impact on the finances of school districts in Cook County, Illinois, reveals that municipal use of TIF depletes the property tax revenues of schools during the lifespan of the TIF district but that a portion of the budget shortfalls are relieved by increases in state school aid. Entrepreneurial policies can create conflict between taxing bodies unless higher levels of government take on some of the fiscal burden of these more redistributive functions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, John. 1990. Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and growth. National Tax Journal43 (2): 155-163.
2.
Berry, Christopher. 2002. Piling on: The fiscal effects of jurisdictional overlap. Unpublished paper, University of Chicago.
3.
Briffault, Richard. 1997. The law and economics of federalism: The rise of sublocal structures in urban governance. Minnesota Law Review82:503-534.
4.
Castells, Manuel. 1979. The urban question. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Clarke, Susan, and Gary Gaile. 1998. The work of cities. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
6.
Cox, Kevin, and Andrew Jonas. 1993. Urban development, collective consumption, and the politics of municipal fragmentation. Political Geography12:8-37.
7.
Dye, Richard, Scott Goldstein, and Therese McGuire. 1998. An evaluation of Illinois' school reforms. Chicago: University of Illinois Institute for Government and Public Affairs and the Metropolitan Planning Council.
8.
Dye, Richard, and Therese McGuire. 1997. The effect of property tax limitation measures on local government fiscal behavior. Journal of Public Economics66:469-487.
9.
Dye, Richard, and David Merriman. 2000. Does tax increment financing discourage economic development? Journal of Urban Economics47:306-328.
10.
Dye, Richard, and Jeffrey Sundberg. 1998. A model of tax increment financing adoption incentives. Growth and Change29 (1):90-110.
11.
Eisinger, Peter. 1988. The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
12.
Fischel, William. 1975. Fiscal and environmental considerations in the location of firms in suburban communities. In Fiscal zoning and land use controls, edited by Edwin Mills and Wallace Oates, 119-174. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
13.
Frug, Gerald. 1999. City making: Building communities without building walls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
14.
Hall, Tim, and Phil Hubbard, eds. 1998. The entrepreneurial city. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
15.
Harvey, David. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geographiska Annaler71B:3-17.
16.
Hausman, J. A. 1976. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica46:1251-1271.
17.
Huddleston, Jack. 1984. Tax increment financing as a state development policy. Growth and Change15 (2): 11-17.
18.
Huddleston, Jack. 1986. Distribution of development costs under tax increment financing. Journal of the American Planning Association52:194-198.
19.
Illinois Association of School Boards. 1993. Referendum, bond issue results. Illinois School Board Journal (March).
20.
Illinois State Board of Education. 2002. State, local and federal financing for Illinois public schools 2000-2001. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Education, February.
21.
Jessop, Bob. 1998. The narrative of enterprise and the enterprise of narrative: Place marketing and the entrepreneurial city. In The entrepreneurial city, edited by Tim Hall and Phil Hubbard, 77-99. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
22.
Johnson, Craig, and Joyce Man. 2001. Tax increment financing and economic development: Uses, structures, and impact. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
23.
Jolin, Marc, Sharon Legenza, and Matt McDermott. 1998. Tax increment financing: Urban renewal of the 1990s. Clearinghouse Review (July-August): 81-99.
24.
Kalous, W. 1983. The impact of tax increment finance feature of an urban renewal authority on public school finance. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
25.
Kriz, Kenneth. 2001. The effect on tax increment finance on local government financial condition. Municipal Finance Journal22 (1): 41-64.
26.
Ladd, Helen, and John Yinger. 1989. America's ailing cities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
27.
LaPlante, Josephine. 2001. Who uses tax increment financing? Local government adoption catalysts. Municipal Finance Journal22 (1): 79-97.
28.
Lawrence, David, and Susan Stephenson. 1995. The economics and politics of tax increment financing. Growth and Change26 (1): 105-137.
29.
Lehnen, Robert, and Carlyn Johnson. 2001. The impact of tax increment financing on school districts: An Indiana case study. In Tax increment financing and economic development: Uses, structures, and impact, edited by Craig Johnson and Joyce Man, 137-154. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
30.
MacLeod, Gordon. 2002. Spatializing injustice in the late entrepreneurial city: Unraveling the contours of Britain's revanchist urbanism. Antipode34:602-624.
31.
Man, Joyce. 1999. Fiscal pressure, tax competition and the adoption of tax increment financing. Urban Studies36 (7): 1151-1167.
32.
Man, Joyce, and Mark Rosentraub. 1998. Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and effects on property value growth. Public Finance Review26 (6): 523-547.
33.
Mandelker, Daniel, ed. 1996. State and local government in a federal system: Cases and materials. 4th ed. New York: Lexis Law Publishers.
34.
Molotch, Harvey. 1976. The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 309-330.
35.
Monkkonen, Eric. 1995. The local state: Public money and American cities. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
36.
Mullins, Thomas. 1994. Tax increment financing: Its effect upon fiscal solvency in an elementary school district. Unpublished dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
37.
Neighborhood Capital Budget Group. 2002. Chicago TIF encyclopedia. Chicago: Neighborhood Capital Budget Group.
38.
Oates, Wallace. 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
39.
Persky, Joe, Dan Felsenstein, and Wim Wiewel. 1997. How do we know that “but for the incentives” the development would not have occurred? in Dilemmas of urban economic development, edited by Richard Bingham and Rob Mier, 28-45. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Peterson, Paul. 1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
41.
Redfield, Kent. 1995. Tax increment financing in Illinois: A legislative issue. Springfield: Taxpayers Federation of Illinois.
42.
Reese, Laura, and Raymond Rosenfeld. 2002. The civic culture of economic development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Rockrohr, Phil. 2001. Judge again dismisses district 215 lawsuit. Daily Southtown, 22 July.
44.
Sbragia, Alberta. 1996. Debt wish: Entrepreneurial cities, U.S. federalism and economic development. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
45.
State of Minnesota. 1996. Tax increment financing. Minneapolis, MN: Program Evaluation Division, Office of the Legislative Auditor.
46.
Stinson, Thomas. 1992. Subsidizing local economic development through tax increment financing. Policy Studies Journal20 (2): 241-248.
47.
Sweeney, Eugene. 1989. School district participation in community redevelopment projects: A study of fourteen school districts affected by tax increment financing. Unpublished dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago.
48.
Tetlock, Philip, and Aaron Belkin, eds. 1996. Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
49.
Weber, Rachel. 2003. Tax increment financing in theory and practice. In Financing economic development. 2d ed., edited by Sammis White, Edward Hill, and Richard Bingham. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
50.
Wisniewski, Mary. 2000. Rosemont, Illinois: A small town near a big airport flexes fiscal muscle. The Bond Buyer, 12 July.
