There has been a growing body of evidence indicating race-based discrimination in small business lending. However, very little research has examined potential geographic redlining effects. This article measures small businesslending flows to neighborhoods in the Philadelphia metro politan area. It advances previous work by measuring differential credit flows while accounting for variations in the credit scores of small firms. Black tracts receive fewer loans after accounting for firm density, firm size, industrial mix, neighborhood income, and the credit quality of local firms. The findings suggest that federal bank regulators should expand small business lending data to include racial characteristics and application information, in part to help identify potentially discriminating lenders for further investigation. Also, Community Reinvestment Act regulations should pay more attention to the distribution of small business loans, by both race and income of neighborhood.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Avery, R.1999. Access to credit for minority-owned businesses. In Proceedings of the Business Access to Capital and Credit Conference, March 8-9, edited by R. Lang, 277-284. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve System Board of Governors.
2.
Bates, T.1989. Small business viability in the urban ghetto. Journal of Regional Science29: 625-643.
3.
Bates, T.1993. Banking on black enterprise: The potential of emerging firms for revitalizing urban economies. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
4.
Bates, T.1997. Unequal access: Financial institution lending to black- and white-owned small business start-ups. Journal of Urban Affairs19: 487-495.
5.
Bates, T.1999. Available evidence indicates that black-owned firmsare often denied equal access to credit. In Proceedings of the Business Access to Capital and Credit Conference, March 8-9, edited by R. Lang, 267-276. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve System Board of Governors.
6.
Blanchflower, D. , P. Levine, and D. Zimmerman. 1998. Discrimination in the small business credit market. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.
7.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System . 1993. National Survey of Small Business Finances. Retrieved from http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/oss/oss3/nssbf93/nssbf93home.html.
8.
Bostic, R. , and G. Canner. 1998. New information on lending to small businesses and small farms: The 1996 CRA data. Federal Reserve Bulletin, January, 1-21.
9.
Bostic, R. , and K. Limpani. 1999. Racial differences in patterns of small business finance. In Proceedings of the Business Access to Capital and Credit Conference, March 8-9, edited by R. Lang, 149-179. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve System Board of Governors.
10.
Bradbury, K. , K. Case, and C. Dunham. 1989. Geographic patterns of mortgage lending in Boston, 1982-1987. New England Economic Review, September/October, 3-30.
11.
Carlson, V.1995. Identifying neighborhood businesses: A comparison of business listings. Economic Development Quarterly9: 50-60.
12.
Cavalluzzo, K. , L. Cavalluzzo, and J. Wolken. 1999. Competition, small business financing and discrimination: Evidence from a new survey. In Proceedings of the Business Access to Capital and Credit Conference, March 8-9, edited by R. Lang, 180-266. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve System Board of Governors.
13.
Cole, R.1998. The importance of relationships to the availability of credit. Journal of Banking and Finance22: 959-977.
14.
Dymski, G.1996. Business strategy and access to capital in inner-city revitalization. The Review of Black Political Economy24 (2/3): 51-66.
15.
Federal Reserve Board of Governors . 1997. Report to the Congress on the availability of credit to small businesses. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
16.
Hula, R.1991. Neighborhood development and local credit markets. Urban Affairs Quarterly27: 249-267.
17.
Hunter, W. C. , and M. B. Walker. 1995. The cultural affinity hypothesis and mortgage lending decisions. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper Series, no. 95-8.
18.
Immergluck, D.1999. Intrametropolitan patterns of small business lending: What do the new CRA data reveal?Urban Affairs Review34: 787-804.
19.
Kim, S. , and G. Squires. 1995. Lender characteristics and racial disparities in mortgage lending. Journal of Housing Research6: 99-113.
20.
Lang, W. , and L. Nakamura. 1993. A model of redlining. Journal of Urban Economics33: 223-234.
21.
Munnell, A. , L. Browne, J. McEneaney, and G. Tootel. 1992. Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. Working paper no. 92-7, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston.
22.
Shlay, A.1988. Not in that neighborhood: The effects of population and housing on the distribution of mortgage finance within the Chicago SMSA. Social Science Research17: 137-163.
23.
Squires, G. , and S. O’Connor. 1999. Access to capital: Milwaukee’s small business lending gaps. In Proceedings of the Business Access to Capital and Credit Conference, March 8-9, edited by R. Lang, 85-122. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve System Board of Governors.
24.
U.S. Department of the Treasury . 1995. Community Reinvestment Act regulations and home mortgage disclosure, final rules. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 12 CFR Part 25.
25.
Yinger, J.1995. Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York: Russell Sage.
