Canada is experiencing a major antifeminist backlash against the results of two Canadian national surveys on woman abuse. The main objectives of this article are to provide examples of the key tactics used in this backlash, such as misleading interpretations of Conflict Tactics Scales data, and to briefly suggest several ways of challenging and resisting them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barak, G. (1988). Newsmaking criminology: Reflections on the media, intellectuals, and crime. Justice Quarterly, 5, 565-587.
2.
Bonnycastle, K. D. , & Rigakos, G. S. (1998). The construction of hetero-sexed violence: Who hurts whom. In K. D. Bonnycastle & G. S. Rigakos (Eds.), Unsettling truths: Battered women, policy, politics, and contemporary research in Canada (pp. 21-22). Vancouver: Collective Press.
3.
Breines, W. , & Gordon, L. (1983). The new scholarship on family violence. Signs, 8, 490-531.
4.
Brinkerhoff, M. , & Lupri, E. (1988). Interspousal violence. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 13, 407-434.
5.
Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
6.
Browning, J. J. , & Dutton, D. G. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 375-379.
7.
Caringella-MacDonald, S. , & Humphries, D. (1998). Guest editors' introduction. Violence Against Women, 4, 3-9.
8.
Chesney-Lind, M. (in press). Review of Patricia Pearson's When she was bad: Violent women and the myth of innocence. Women & Criminal Justice.
9.
Christensen, F. (1995). A serious case of distorted science in Canada. Unpublished paper, Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta.
10.
Cobb, C. (1998, June 15). Divorce panel “taunts” women: Women who report abuse are intimidated, MP charges. Ottawa Citizen, p. A3.
11.
Dankwort, J. (1994). Counselors' accounts of wife abuse and their practice. Doctoral dissertation, School of Social Work, University of Montreal.
12.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (1996). The Canadian national survey on woman abuse in university/college dating: Biofeminist panic transmission or critical inquiry?Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 81-104.
13.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997a, November 11). Fighting words. Saturday Night, p. 11.
14.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997b, July 13). There's still a market for belittling female crime victims. Ottawa Citizen, p. A13.
15.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , & Hinch, R. (1991). Woman abuse: Sociological perspectives. Toronto: Thompson.
16.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , & Kelly, K. (1993). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Canadian university and college dating relationships. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 18, 137-159.
17.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , & MacLean, B. D. (1998). “But women do it too”: The contexts and nature of female-to-male violence in Canadian heterosexual dating relationships. In K. D. Bonnycastle & G. S. Rigakos (Eds.), Unsettling truths: Battered women, policy, politics, and contemporary research in Canada (pp. 23-30). Vancouver: Collective Press.
18.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , & MacLeod, L. (1997). Woman abuse: A sociological story. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
19.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , Saunders, D. G., Schwartz, M. D., & Alvi, S. (1997). The meanings and motives for women's use of violence in Canadian college dating relationships: Results from a national survey. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 199-222.
20.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , & Schwartz, M. D. (1998a). Male peer support and woman abuse in postsecondary school courtship: Suggestions for new directions in sociological research. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 83-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998b). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. U.S. Department of Justice Violence Against Women Grants Office Electronic Resources. Available: http://www.vaw.umn.edu/research.asp
22.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , & Schwartz, M. D. (1998c). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian national survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.
24.
Dobash, R. P. , Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
25.
Doob, A. (1995). Understanding the attacks on Statistics Canada's Violence Against Women Survey. In M. Valverde, L. MacLeod, & K. Johnson (Eds.), Wife assault and the Canadian criminal justice system (pp. 157-165). Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
26.
Edleson, J. L. , & Brygger, M. P. (1986). Gender differences in reporting of battering incidences. Family Relations, 35, 377-382.
27.
Ellis, D. (1995). Spousal violence: Who hurts whom, how often and how seriously. North York: LaMarsh Research Centre on Violence and Conflict Resolution, York University.
28.
Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
29.
Fekete, J. (1994). Moral panic: Biopolitics rising. Montreal: Robert Davies.
30.
Gilbert, N. (1997). Advocacy research and social policy. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (pp. 101-148). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Greenfield, N. M. (1997a, June 25). The demonization of men: Radical feminists wrong to declare all men violent. Ottawa Citizen, p. A17.
32.
Greenfield, N. M. (1997b, July 16). Tactics of demonization superbly illustrated. Ottawa Citizen, p. A12.
33.
Gurney, J. N. (1985). Not one of the guys: The female researcher in a male-dominated setting. Qualitative Sociology, 8, 42-62.
34.
Hickey, E. W. (1997). Serial murderers and their victims (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
35.
Hornosty, J. M. (1996). A look at faculty fears and needed university policies against violence and harassment. In C. Stark-Adamec (Ed.), Violence: A collective responsibility (pp. 31-56). Ottawa: Social Science Federation of Canada.
36.
Huff, J. K. (1997). The sexual harassment of researchers by research subjects: Lessons from the field. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 115-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Johnson, H. (1995). Response to allegations about the Violence Against Women Survey. In M. Valverde, L. MacLeod, & K. Johnson (Eds.), Wife assault and the Canadian criminal justice system (pp. 148-156). Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
38.
Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Toronto: Nelson.
39.
Jouriles, E. N. , & O'Leary, K. N. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
40.
Kasinsky, R. G. (1998). Tailhook and the construction of sexual harassment in the media: “Rowdy navy boys” and women who made a difference. Violence Against Women, 4, 81-99.
41.
Kelly, L. , & Radford, J. (1987). The problem of men: Feminist perspectives on sexual violence. In P. Scraton (Ed.), Law, order and the authoritarian state (pp. 237-253). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
42.
Koss, M. P. , Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
43.
Levan, A. (1996). Violence against women. In J. Brodie (Ed.), Women and Canadian public policy (pp. 319-354). Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
44.
Lombroso, C. (1958). The female offender. New York: Philosophical Library.
45.
Markus, H. , & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Volume 1. Theory and method (pp. 137-230). New York: Random House.
46.
Mattley, C. (1997). Field research with phone sex workers: Managing the researcher's emotions. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 101-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Messerschmidt, J. W. (1986). Capitalism, patriarchy, and crime: Toward a socialist feminist criminology. Totowa, NJ: Roman and Littlefield.
48.
Pearson, P. (1997a). When she was bad: Violent women and the myth of innocence. Toronto: Random House.
49.
Pearson, P. (1997b, September). Women behaving badly. Saturday Night, pp. 90-100.
50.
Pease, K. (1985). Obscene telephone calls to women in England and Wales. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 275-281.
51.
Raeside, P. (1997, November). [Untitled letter.] Saturday Night, p. 11.
52.
Renzetti, C. M. (1994). On dancing with a bear: Reflections on some of the current debates among domestic violence theorists. Violence and Victims, 9, 195-200.
53.
Renzetti, C. M. (1997). Foreword. In M. Schwartz & W. DeKeseredy, Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support (pp. vii-xii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Russell, D.E.H. (1990). Rape in marriage (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
55.
Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or self-defense?Violence and Victims, 1, 47-60.
56.
Schwartz, M. D. , & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1993). The return of the “battered husband syndrome” through the typification of women as violent. Crime, Law and Social Change, 20, 249-265.
57.
Schwartz, M. D., & Dekeseredy, W. S. (1994, December). “People without data” attacking rape: The Gilbertization of Mary Koss. Violence Update, pp. 5, 8, 11.
58.
Schwartz, M. D. , & Koss, M. P. (1998, November). The backlash movement against feminist rape research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC.
59.
Smith, M. D. (1986). Effects of question format on the reporting of woman abuse: A telephone survey experiment. Victimology, 11, 430-438.
60.
Sommer, R. (1994). Male and female perpetrated partner abuse: Testing a diathesis-stress model. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manitoba.
61.
Sommer, R. (1998). Beyond a one-dimensional view: The politics of family violence in Canada. In K. D. Bonnycastle & G. S. Rigakos (Eds.), Unsettling truths: Battered women, policy, politics, and contemporary research in Canada (pp. 31-38). Vancouver: Collective Press.
62.
Stanko, E. A. (1990). Everyday violence: How women and men experience sexual and physical danger. London: Pandora.
63.
Stanko, E. A. (1997). “I second that emotion”: Reflections on feminism, emotionality, and research on sexual violence. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 74-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Stark-Adamec, C. (1996). Psychological violence in academia. In C. Stark-Adamec (Ed.), Violence: A collective responsibility (pp. 21-30). Ottawa: Social Science Federation of Canada.
65.
Statistics Canada . (1993). Violence Against Women Survey. Ottawa: Author.
66.
Steinmetz, S. K. (1977-1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 3-4, 499-509.
67.
Stets, J. E. , & Henderson, D. A. (1991). Contextual factors surrounding conflict resolution while dating: Results from a national study. Family Relations, 40, 29-36.
68.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
69.
Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptions to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 49-73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
70.
Straus, M. A. , & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465-479.
71.
Straus, M. A. , Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1981). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor.
72.
Straus, M. A. , Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1995). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2-Form A). Durham: University of New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory.
73.
Sugarman, D. B. , & Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3-32). New York: Praeger.
74.
Thorne-Finch, R. (1992). Ending the silence: The origins and treatment of male violence against women. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
75.
Wolf, N. (1993). Fire with fire. London: Chatto & Windus.
76.
Yllo, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
