Drawing on surveys administered to 861 university women in nine institutions, this article presents a routine activity theory model for predicting stalking victimization likelihood for women. Using routine activity theory, the model highlights lifestyle behaviors and interactions as predictors of stalking victimization. Whereas routine activity theory often highlights the role of demographics and statuses as predictors, this analysis emphasizes the role of women's social interactions and substance use in victimization risk. Significant predictors of victimization likelihood include substance use variables, activities in public settings, and residence off campus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Buzawa, E. S. , & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
2.
Cohen, L. , & Cantor, D. (1981). Residential burglary in the United States: Life-style and demographic factors associated with the probability of victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 113-127.
3.
Cohen, L. , Cantor, D., & Kleugel, J. (1981). Robbery victimization in the U.S.: An analysis of a nonrandom event. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 644-657.
4.
Cohen, L. , & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
5.
Coleman, F. L. (1997). Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 420-432.
6.
DeKeseredy, W. S. , & Schwartz, M. D. (1996). Contemporary criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7.
Dietz, P. E. , Matthews, D. B., Martell, D. A., Stewart, T. M., Hrouda, D. R., & Warren. J. (1991). Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 1445-1468.
8.
Dietz, P. E. , Matthews, D. B., Van Duyne, C., Martell, D. A., Parry, C.D.H., Stewart, T., Warren, J., & Crowder, J. (1991). Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to Hollywood celebrities. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 185-209.
9.
Dziegielewski, S. F. , & Roberts, A. R. (1995). Stalking victims and survivors: Identification, legal remedies and crisis treatment. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Crisis intervention and time-limited cognitive treatment (pp. 73-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
10.
Engs, R. C. , & Hanson, D. J. (1994). Boozing and brawling on campus: A national study of violent problems associated with drinking over the past decade. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 171-180.
11.
Gallagher, R. P., Bruner, L. A., & Lingenfelter, C. O. (1993). National survey of counseling directors.
12.
Garofalo, J. , Siegel, L., & Laub, J. (1987). School-related victimizations among adolescents: An analysis of National Crime Survey (NCS) narratives. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 321-338.
13.
Geberth, V. J. (1992, October). Stalkers. Law & Order, 10, 138-143.
14.
Gilligan, M. J. (1992). Stalking the stalker. Georgia Law Review, 27, 285-342.
15.
Harrell, A. V. , Smith, B. E., & Cook, R. F. (1985). The social psychological effects of victimization (Report submitted to the National Institute of Justice). Washington, DC: Institute for Social Analysis.
16.
Hazelwood, R. R. , & Douglas, J. E. (1980). The lust murderer. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 49, 18-22.
17.
Holloway, S. L. (1994). Relationship abuse and the termination process: Female mental health professionals' retrospective reports. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
18.
Holmes, R. M. (1993). Stalking in America: Types and methods of criminal stalkers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9, 317-327.
19.
Holmes, R. M. (1994, May). Stalking in America. Law & Order, 12, 89-92.
20.
Keeney, B. T. , & Heide, K. M. (1994). Gender differences in serial murderers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 383-398.
21.
Lasley, J. R. (1989). Drinking routines/lifestyles and predatory victimization: A causal analysis. Justice Quarterly, 6, 529-542.
22.
Lottes, I. L. , Adler, M. A., & DeMaris, A. (1996). Using and interpreting logistic regression: A guide for teachers and students. Teaching Sociology, 24, 284-298.
23.
Lynch, J. (1987). Routine activity and victimization at work. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 283-301.
24.
Massey, J. L. , Krohn, M. D., & Bonati, L. (1989). Property crime and the routine activities of individuals. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 378-400.
25.
Maxfield, M. (1987). Household composition, routine activity, and victimization: A comparative analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 301-320.
26.
Miethe, T. D. , Stafford, M. C., & Sloane, D. (1990). Lifestyle changes and risks of criminal victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6, 357-376.
27.
Morin, K. S. (1995). The phenomenon of stalking: Do existing state statutes provide adequate protection? In M. J. Gorr & S. Harwood (Eds.), Crime and punishment: Philosophic explorations (pp. 68-79). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
28.
Mustaine, E. E. , & Tewksbury, R. (1997). The risk of victimization in the workplace for men and women: An analysis using routine activities/lifestyle theory. Humanity & Society, 21, 1-22.
29.
Mustaine, E. E. , & Tewksbury, R. (1998). Specifying the role of alcohol in predatory victimization. Deviant Behavior, 19, 173-199.
30.
National Institute of Justice. (1996). Domestic violence, stalking, and anti-stalking legislation. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
National Rifle Association . (1992). Stalking: A survey of recently enacted stalking laws and recommendations for a model statute. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
National Victim Center. (1997). Stalking [On-line]. Available: http://www.nvc.org/ddir/info43.htm.
33.
Norris, J. (1988). Serial killers: The growing menace. New York: Dolphin.
34.
Pernanen, K. (1991). Alcohol and human violence. New York: Guilford.
35.
Peterson, R. , & Bailey, W. (1992). Rape and dimensions of gender socioeconomic inequality in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 162-177.
36.
Riley, D. (1987). Time and crime: The link between teenager lifestyle and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 339-354.
37.
Romans, J.S.C. , Hays, J. R., & White, T. K. (1996). Stalking and related behaviors experienced by counseling center staff members from current or former clients. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 595-599.
38.
Roth, J. A. (1994). Psychoactive substances and violence. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
39.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1990). SAS/STAT users guide, Volume 2, Version 6 (4th ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
40.
Schwartz, M. , & Pitts, V. L. (1995). Exploring a feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 12, 9-31.
41.
Senate Judiciary Committee. (1992, September 29). Hearing on S.2911 Antistalking Legislation.
42.
Smith, M. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257-273.
Toby, J. (1995). The schools. In J. Petersilia & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Crime (pp. 141-170). San Francisco: ICS.
45.
Wallace, H. (1996). Family violence: Legal, medical, and social perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
Wooldredge, J. D. , Cullen, F. T., & Latessa E. J. (1992). Research note: Victimization in the workplace: A test of routine activities theory. Justice Quarterly, 9, 325-335.
47.
Wright, J. A. , Burgess, A. G., Burgess, A. W., Laszlo, A. T., McCrary, G. O., & Douglas, J. E. (1996). A typology of interpersonal stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 487-502.
48.
Zona, M. A. , Sharma, K. K., & Lane, J. (1993). Comparative study of erotomanic and obsessional subjects in a forensic sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38, 894-903.
