By examining the reporting of the Tailhook incident in the mainstream media, from the event itself through the conclusion of military and congressional debates about its meaning 5 years later, this article demonstrates that the media construct representations that are in accordance with the dominant gender ideology. The military's interpretation of Tailhook—“boys will be boys” with “party girls”—was contested by the women who were harassed and assaulted. Although the military's cover-up of the incident was interrupted by the intervention of powerful women in the Senate, media coverage reinforced the dominant view of sexual harassment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A few good women. (1992, December). Vanity Fair, p. 195.
2.
Cary, P. (1992, July 13). What's wrong with the Navy. U.S. News & World Report, pp. 22-31.
3.
Dewar, H. (1994, April 20). Senate women lose fight to pull rank; citing Tailhook scandal. Washington Post, p. A1.
4.
Dines, G. , & Humez, J. (1995). Gender, race and class in media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Dowd, M. (1993, August 18). Testimony conflicts at military hearing on abouse by fliers. The New York Times, p. A1.
6.
Dowd, M. (1994, April 20). Senate approves a 4-star rank for admiral in Tailhook affair. The New York Times, p. A1.
7.
Forum. (1992, August 10). Aviation Week and Space Technology, p. 11.
8.
Four sue Navy flier group. (1992, September 11). The New York Times, p. A24.
9.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Gitlin, T. (1983). Inside prime time. New York: Pantheon.
11.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
12.
Green, S. (1994a, April 21). Kelso critics could alter stands on gender issues. The San Diego Union-Tribune, p. A1.
13.
Green, S. (1994b, April 20). Senate upholds 4-star retirement for Kelso. The San Diego Union Tribune, p. A1.
14.
Herman, E. H. , & Chomsky, C. (1988). Manufacturing consent. New York: Pantheon.
15.
Jennings, P. (Anchor). (1992, June 24). World news tonight. New York and Washington, DC: American Broadcasting Corporation.
16.
Kasinsky, R. (1994). Patrolling the facts: Media, cops, and crime. In G. Barak (Ed.), Media, process, and the social construction of crime (pp. 203-234). New York: Garland.
17.
Kelso challenges judge's finding. (1994, February 12). The New York Times, p. A1.
18.
Lancaster, J. (1991a, October 30). Navy “gauntlet” probed; Sex harassment alleged at fliers' convention. Washington Post, p. A1.
19.
Lancaster, J. (1991b, November 6). Admiral punished in abuse probe; Inaction on complaint by female aide cited. Washington Post, p. A1.
20.
Lancaster, J. (1992, June 24). A gauntlet of terror, frustration; Navy pilot recounts Tailhook incident. Washington Post, p. A1.
21.
McMichael, W. (1997). The mother of all hooks. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
22.
The Navy cuts ties. (1991, October 31). The New York Times, p. 20.
23.
1992 women of the year. (1992, December). Glamour, p. 112.
24.
Noble, K. (1994a, October 29). Hotel is told to pay $1.7 million to women molested by aviators. The New York Times, p. A1.
25.
Noble, K. (1994b, October 4). Tailhook whistle-blower recalls attack. The New York Times, p. A12.
26.
Office of the Inspector General. (1993). The Tailhook report. New York: St. Martin's.
27.
Pentagon given photos of abuse, newspaper says. (1992, June 29). The New York Times, p. A19.
28.
Quindlen, A. (1992, June 24). With extreme prejudice. The New York Times, p. A21.
29.
Right charge, wrong man. (1993, October 23). Washington Post, p. 22.
30.
Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism. Boston: South End.
31.
Salholz, E., & Waller, D. (1992, July 6). Tailhook: Scandal time. Newsweek, p. 40.
32.
Santini, M. (1992, November). “You did the right thing.” Paula Coughlin, who filed sexual harassment charges against the U.S. Navy. Ladies Home Journal, p. 50.
33.
Schmitt, E. (1992a, June 14). Wall of silence impedes inquiry into a rowdy Navy convention. The New York Times, p. A1.
34.
Schmitt, E. (1992b, June 27). Navy chief quits amid questions over role in sex-assault inquiry. The New York Times, p. A1.
35.
Schmitt, E. (1992c, September 25). Senior Navy officers suppressed sex investigation. The New York Times, p. A1.
36.
Schmitt, E. (1993, August 21). Military falters on prosecution in sex scandal. The New York Times, p. A1.
37.
Schmitt, E. (1994, April 18). Senate women want admiral to lose rank. The New York Times, p. A1.
38.
Sloyan, P. J. (1993, April 24). Atmosphere of debauchery: Pentagon hits Navy brass for Tailhook wrongdoings. The New York Times, p. A1.
39.
Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts and femininity. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
40.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
41.
Vistica, G. (1991, October 29). Women reportedly abused by Navy pilots at seminar. The San Diego Union Tribune, p. A7.
42.
Vistica, G. (1992, April 28). Navy brass accused of ignoring molestation reports. The San Diego Union Tribune, p. A1.
43.
Vistica, G. (1993a, February 23). Congresswomen seek release of Tailhook report. The San Diego Union Tribune, p. A1.
44.
Vistica, G. (1993b, February 24). Release of Tailhook report demanded, 15 congresswomen send letter to defense secretary. The San Diego Union Tribune, p. A1.
45.
Vistica, G. (1995). Fall from glory. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
Waller, D. (1994, February 28). Tailhook's “lightning rod.”Newsweek, p. 31.
47.
Webb, J. (1992, October 6). Witch hunt in the Navy. The New York Times, p. 23.
48.
Whistle-blower quits Navy. (1994, February 11). The New York Times, p. 24.
49.
Woman wins $5 million for Tailhook. (1994, November 1). The New York Times, p. A1.
50.
Zimmerman, J. (1995). Tailspin: Women at war in the wake of Tailhook. New York: Doubleday.
