National survey research suggests that males and females are equally likely to perpetrate domestic violence, but surveys have not examined the interpersonal context or motivation for domestic violence. The questioning of identified partner assaulters suggests that females use violence for self-defense and escape, whereas males use violence to exercise control, punish, or demand attention. The perception of perpetrator violence, however, appears also to be a function of the gender of the individual appraising the violence. Six male and 6 female adult nonperpetrators sorted into categories the stated motivations for domestic violence of 215 male and 66 female court-referred perpetrators. Factor analysis revealed (a) motivations common to all: control, anger expression, and coercive communication; (b) motivations specific to gender of perpetrator: retaliation, self-defense, escape, and punishment; and (c) motivations specific to gender of perpetrator and sorter: alcohol use and response to verbal abuse.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldenderfer, M. S. , & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Russell Sage.
2.
Barnett, O. W. (1995, July). Gender differences in forms, outcomes and attributions for interpartner aggression. Paper presented at the Fourth International Family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH.
3.
Barnett, O. W. , Keyson, M., & Thelen, R. E. (1992, August). Women's violence as a response to male abuse. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
4.
Cantos, A. L. , Neidig, P. L., & O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Injuries of women and men in a treatment program for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 113-124.
5.
Cascardi, M. , & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 265-293.
6.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1984). The nature and antecedents of violent events. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 269-288.
7.
Giles-Sims, J. (1983). Wife battering: A systems theory approach. New York: Guilford.
8.
Hamberger, L. K. , & Lohr, J. M. (1989). Proximal causes of spouse abuse: A theoretical analysis for cognitive-behavioral interventions. In P. L. Caesar & L. K. Hamberger (Eds.), Treating men who batter: Theory, practice and programs (pp. 53-76). New York: Springer.
9.
Hamberger, L. K. , Lohr, J. M., & Bonge, D. B. (1994). The intended function of domestic violence is different for arrested male and female perpetrators. Family Violence and Sexual Assault Bulletin, 10, 40-44.
10.
Hamberger, L. K. , & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling women arrested for domestic violence: Implications for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 125-138.
11.
Jacobson, N. (1995, July). Are batterers like the rest of us? It depends. Paper presented at the Fourth International Family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH.
12.
Jacobson, N. S. , Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Babcock, J., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 982-988.
13.
Kim, J. , & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-014). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
King, L. K., Berrio, M. M., & Hupp, P. A. (1993). Predictors of attitudes about relatively mild male-female aggression. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
15.
Koss, M. P. , Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. , Neidig, P., & Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159-176.
17.
McCabe, A. , & Lipscomb, T. (1986, August). Sex differences in the interpretation of verbal aggression. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
18.
Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Praeger.
19.
Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or selfdefense?Violence and Victims, 1, 47-60.
20.
Saunders, D. G. (1988, March/April). Other “truths” about domestic violence: A reply to McNeely and Robinson-Simpson. Social Work, pp. 179-183.
21.
Saunders, D. G. (1989). Cognitive and behavioral interventions with men who batter: Applications and outcome. In P. L. Caesar & L. K. Hamberger (Eds.), Treating men who batter: Theory, practice and programs (pp. 77-100). New York: Springer.
22.
Stets, J. E. , & Straus, M. A. (1989). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 151-165). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
23.
Straus, M. A. , & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47, 465-479.
24.
Straus, M. A. , Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor.
25.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (3rd ed.) (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-049). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
