This paper examines the reception of the concept of obstetric violence within the Spanish legal system. It analyzes the judicial arguments used to deny its existence, and identifies four circumstances that sustain this form of gender-based violence: medical authoritarianism, epistemic injustice, disregard of informed consent, and the prioritization of the protection of the fetus. It then critically assesses the approach towards obstetric violence in a 2023 legal reform. It concludes that despite the rejection of the concept, the alternative one that was included has an open character and recognizes that it is structural and a form of gender-based violence.
AbramsJ. R. (2013). Distorted and diminished tort claims for women. Cardozo Law Review, 34(5), 1955–1998. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/2030
2.
ArissR. (1996). The recycled Fetus: Semiosis and new reproductive technologies. In KevelsonR. (Ed.), Law and the conflict of ideologies: Ninth round table on law and semiotics (pp. 25–34). Peter Lang.
3.
Bea PérezE. (2022). Nacer en casa. Una reflexión sobre bioética y derechos humanos. Cuadernos de Bioética, 33(107), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.114
4.
CastroR.Le DoaréH. (2022). Violence obstétricale et autoritarisme de l’habitus médical au mexique. Cahiers Du Genre, 71(2), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.3917/cdge.071.0025
5.
ChadwickR. (2021). Breaking the frame: Obstetric violence and epistemic rupture. Agenda: A Journal About Women and Gender, 35(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2021.1958554
6.
ClesseC.Lighezzolo-AlnotJ.De LavergneS.HamlinS.SchefflerM. (2018). Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care for Women International, 39(6), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2018.1445253
7.
Cohen ShabotS. (2020). Amigas, sisters: We’re being gaslighted’ obstetric violence and epistemic injustice. In PicklesC.HerringJ. (Eds.), Childbirth, vulnerability and law. Exploring issues of violence and control (pp. 14–29). Routledge.
Costa-RamónA. M.Rodríguez-GonzálezA.Serra-BurrielM.Campillo-ArteroC. (2018). It’s about time: Cesarean sections and neonatal health. Journal of Health Economics, 59(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.03.004
10.
Cuñarro-LópezY.Pintado-RecarteP.Cueto-HernándezI.Hernández-MartínC.Payá-MartínezM. P.Muñóz-ChápuliM. D.Cano-ValderramaÓBravoC.BujanJ.Álvarez-MonM.OrtegaM. A.De León-LuisJ. A. (2021). The profile of the obstetric patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection according to country of origin of the publication: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(2), 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020360
11.
DebrabandereM. L.FarabaughD. C.GiordanoC. (2020). A review on mode of delivery during COVID-19 between December 2019 and April 2020. American Journal of Perinatology, 38(4), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721658
12.
Díaz GarcíaL. I.FernándezM. Y. (2018). Situación legislativa de la violencia obstétrica en américa latina: El caso de Venezuela, Argentina, méxico y Chile. Revista de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 51, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-68512018005000301
FerrajoliL. (2002). La cuestión del embrión entre derecho y moral. Jueces Para La Democracia, 44, 3–12.
15.
FríasS. M.CastroR. (2024). Mistreatment, abuse, and gender-based violence during childbirth: A longitudinal analysis of obstetric violence in méxico (2011–2021). Violence Against Women, 31(14), 3496–3522. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241289426
16.
FrickerM. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
17.
GoldsteinJ. T.EdenA. R.TaylorM. K.DotsonA.BarretoT. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on perinatal care: Perceptions of family physicians in the United States. Birth (Berkeley, Calif ), 49(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12637
HerringJ. (2020). Identifying the wrong in obstetric violence: Lessons from domestic abuse. In PicklesC.HerringJ. (Eds.), Childbirth, vulnerability and law. Exploring issues of violence and control (pp. 67–87). Routledge.
20.
Human Rights Council. (2016). Report of the Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice, with regard to health and safety (A/HRC/32/44). United Nations.
JohnsenD. E. (1986). The creation of fetal rights: Conflicts with women’s constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. The Yale Law Journal, 95(3), 599–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/796491
LévesqueS.Ferron-ParayreA. (2021). To use or not to use the term ‘obstetric violence’: Commentary on the article by swartz and lappeman. Violence Against Women, 27(8), 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801221996456
26.
Martínez-GalianoJ. M.Martinez-VazquezS.Rodríguez-AlmagroJ.Hernández-MartinezA. (2021). The magnitude of the problem of obstetric violence and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study. Women and Birth, 34(5), e526–e536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.002
27.
Massó GuijarroE.Triviño-CaballeroR. (2022). So close, so far: Sexual and reproductive rights in the COVID-19 era. In SchweigerG. (Ed.), The global and social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (pp. 177–198). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97982-9_11
28.
MayopoulosG. A.Ein-DorT.LiK. G.ChanS. J.DekelS. (2021). COVID-19 positivity associated with traumatic stress response to childbirth and no visitors and infant separation in the hospital. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 13535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92985-4
29.
Mena-TudelaD.Iglesias-CasásS.González-ChordáV. M.Cervera-GaschÁAndreu-PejóL.Valero-ChilleronM. J. (2020). Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part I): Women’s Perception and Interterritorial Differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217726
30.
Mena-TudelaD.Iglesias-CasásS.González-ChordáV. M.Cervera-GaschÁAndreu-PejóL.Valero-ChilleronM. J. (2021). Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part II): Interventionism and Medicalization during Birth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010199
31.
MijatovicD. (2023). Report following her visit to Spain from 21 to 25 November 2022 (CommHR(2023)9). Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe.
32.
Ministerio de Sanidad. (2020). Manejo de la mujer embarazada y el recién nacido con COVID-19. Gobierno de España.
33.
Ministerio de Sanidad. (2021). Sistema de Información y Registro de Atención Especializada (SIAE-RAE).
Paris AnguloS.Gracia SuárezA. (2021). Parir en tiempos de COVID-19. Aumento de la violencia obstétrica durante la pandemia. Gaceta Internacional de Ciencias Forenses, 39(April-June), 36–44.
37.
PicklesC. (2020). Leaving women behind. The application of evidence-based guidelines, law, and obstetric violence by omission. In PicklesC.HerringJ. (Eds.), Childbirth, vulnerability and law. Exploring issues of violence and control (pp. 140–160). Routledge.
38.
PicklesC. (2023). ‘Obstetric violence,’ ‘mistreatment,’ and ‘disrespect and abuse’: Reflections on the politics of naming violations during facility-based childbirth. Hypatia, 38(3), 628–649. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2023.73
39.
PicklesC. (2024). Everything is obstetric violence now’: Identifying the violence in ‘obstetric violence’ to strengthen socio-legal reform efforts. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 44(3), 616–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqae016
40.
PitchT. (2003). Un derecho para dos: La construcción jurídica de género, sexo y sexualidad. Trotta.
RichardsonA. (2022). The Case for Affirmative Consent in Childbirth. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law and Justice, 37, 1–54. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z388C9R50Z
45.
Rodríguez-AlmagroJ.Hernández-MartínezA.Rodríguez-AlmagroD.Quirós-GarcíaJ. M.Martínez-GalianoJ. M.Gómez-SalgadoJ. (2019). Women’s Perceptions of Living a Traumatic Childbirth Experience and Factors Related to a Birth Experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091654
46.
Secretaría de Estado para la Unión Europea. (2023). Report of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe Following her Visit to Spain from 21 to 25 November 2022. Comments by Spain. Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, Unión Europea y Cooperación.
47.
ŠimonovićD. (2019). A human rights-based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence (A/74/137). United Nations Special Rapporteur on violence against women.
Societat Catalana d’Obstetrícia i Ginecologia, and Consell de Col·legis de Metges de Catalunya. (2021). Comunicado conjunto de la Sociedad Catalana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (SCOG) y el Consejo de Colegios de Médicos de Cataluña (CCMC) sobre la ‘violencia obstétrica.’ [Press reléase]. https://www.comb.cat/upload/Documents/9/3/9316.PDF
WilliamsC.JerezC.KleinK.CorreaM.BelizánJ.CormickG. (2018). Obstetric violence: A Latin American legal response to mistreatment during childbirth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125(10), 1208–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15270
52.
WilliamsC. R.MeierB. M. (2019). Ending the abuse: The human rights implications of obstetric violence and the promise of rights-based policy to realise respectful maternity care. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 27(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1691899
World Health Organization. (2015). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth.
55.
World Health Organization. (2020). Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected, interim guidance.
