Reframing Institutional Responsibility for Gender-Based Violence Against Women: Feminist Legal Theory,International Law and Due Diligence

Abstract

Feminist legal theory exposes how laws and institutions have historically reproduced patriarchal power and gender-based violence. Within international law, the principle of due diligence has become a key framework for redefining state responsibility, requiring not only the punishment of individual perpetrators but also the prevention and redress of structural forms of harm. Through a feminist and intersectional lens, due diligence moves beyond formal compliance to demand institutional accountability grounded in situated knowledge. This perspective envisions justice as a transformative process that compels states to confront the cultural and epistemic hierarchies sustaining violence and to reconstruct legal practices toward genuine gender-sensitive governance.

Keywords

institutional violence gender-based violence due diligence feminist legal theory intersectionality situated knowledge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

(2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2753906700003235

Angelet

(2024, July 30). Due diligence in international law: From environmental and economic law to migrant protection. Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.59704/a031c298c59a57fb

Antonsdóttir

H. F.

(2020). Injustice disrupted: Experiences of just spaces by victim-survivors of sexual violence. Social & Legal Studies, 29(5), 718–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919896065

Arendt

(1970). On violence. Harcourt, Brace & World.

Assis

M. P.

(2017). Violence against women as a translocal category in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Revista Direito e Práxis, 8(2), 144–1507. https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2017.28032

Balajorshari

S. M.

Mahmoudi

(2022). Combating domestic violence against women according to the judicial precedent of the European Court of Human Rights. International Studies Journal, 19(2), 55–57. https://doi.org/10.22034/isj.2022.357174.1893

Basaglia

(1975). Crimini di pace. Einaudi.

Boiano

Condello

(2019). Femminismo giuridico. Mondadori.

Bourke-Martignoni

(2009). The history and development of the due diligence standard in international law and its role in the protection of women against violence. In Due diligence and its application to protect women from violence (pp. 3–40). Brill/Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004162938.i-300.18

10.

Bumiller

(2020). In an abusive state: How neoliberalism appropriated the feminist movement against sexual violence. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389071

11.

Butler

(1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

12.

Butler

(2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.

13.

Butler

(2025). Who’s afraid of gender? Penguin Books.

14.

Campbell

(2016). Gender justice beyond the tribunals: From criminal accountability to transformative justice. American Journal of International Law, 110(3), 375–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398772300009077

15.

Capecchi

Gius

(2023). Gender-based violence representation in the Italian media: Reviewing changes in public narrations from femicide to revenge pornography. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(1), 81–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2023-1-4. https://ijse.padovauniversitypress.it/2023/1/4

16.

Carbado

D. W.

Crenshaw

K. W.

Mays

V. M.

Tomlinson

(2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000349

17.

Carmichael

Hamilton

C. V.

(1967). Black power: The politics of liberation. Vintage.

18.

Charlesworth

Chinkin

Wright

(1991). Feminist approaches to international law. American Journal of International Law, 85(4), 613–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203269

19.

Christie

(1986). The ideal victim. In Fattah

E. A.

(Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system (pp. 17–30). Macmillan.

20.

Courtis

Malfatti

(2021). Feminist perspectives on international human rights law. Edward Elgar.

21.

Cover

(1986). Violence and the word. Yale Law Journal, 95, 1601–1629. https://doi.org/10.2307/796468

22.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. In Feminist legal theory (pp. 57–80). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5

23.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

24.

Davis

(2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.

25.

De Vido

(2017). The ECtHR Talpis v. Italy judgment challenging the Osman test through the Council of Europe Istanbul Convention. Ricerche giuridiche, 6(2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429289736-3

26.

De Vido

(2020). Violence against women’s health in international law. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526124982

27.

De Vido

(2022). Toward a gender-sensitive due diligence test in domestic violence cases. Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale, 3(2), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.12829/106189

28.

De Vido

(2024). La Convenzione di Istanbul quale strumento interpretativo del diritto derivato dell’UE in situazioni di violenza contro le donne: la sentenza C-621/21 della CGUE. SIDI Blog.

29.

De Vido

Frulli

(2023). Preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence: A commentary on the Istanbul Convention. Edward Elgar.

30.

De Vido

Valerio

(2025). The Istanbul Convention in Italy: Legislative activism failing to protect women victims of violence. In Burek

Sękowska-Kozłowska

Zimmermann

(Eds.), The Istanbul Convention in action: Case studies from selected states parties (pp. 57–77). Edward Elgar Publishing.

31.

Engle Merry

(2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00037.x

32.

Fanon

(1961). Les damnés de la terre. François Maspero.

33.

Farquhar

(2021). Structural violence in the queer community: A comparative analysis of international human rights protections for LBTIQ+ people. Inquiries Journal, 13(12).

34.

Fineman

M. A.

(1995). The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315021744

35.

Fineman

M. A.

(2005). Feminist legal theory. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 13(1), 13–20. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2132233

36.

Firestone

(1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. Morrow.

37.

Foucault

(1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Gallimard.

38.

Foucault

(1976). Histoire de la sexualité. Vol. 1: La volonté de savoir. Gallimard.

39.

Fraser

(1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge.

40.

Fredman

(2022). Discrimination law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854081.001.0001

41.

Galtung

(1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301

42.

Galtung

(1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005

43.

Grans

(2018). The concept of due diligence and the positive obligation to prevent honour-related violence: Beyond deterrence. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(5), 733–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1454907

44.

GREVIO. (2020). Report on the implementation of the Istanbul Convention in Italy. Criminal Justice Network. https://www.criminaljusticenetwork.eu/it/post/il-rapporto-del-grevio-sullapplicazione-in-italia-della-convenzione-di-istanbul-il-lavoro-ancora-da-fare

45.

Grosser

Tyler

(2022). Sexual harassment, sexual violence and CSR: Radical feminist theory and a human rights perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(1), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04724-w

46.

Hanish

(1970). The personal is political. Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation.

47.

Haraway

(1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

48.

Harrington

A. R.

(2012). Institutionalizing human rights in Latin America: The role of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights system. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1980796

49.

hooks

(1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End Press.

50.

Kapur

(2002). The tragedy of victimization rhetoric: Resurrecting the native subject in international/postcolonial feminist legal politics. Harvard Human Rights Law Journal, 15, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843146193-9. https://ssrn.com/abstract=779824

51.

Lanovoy

(2024). Due diligence in international law: A useful renaissance or “all things to all people”? European Journal of International Law, 35(4), 1029–1057. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae067

52.

Limantė

(2023). Gender-based violence in international instruments and case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391937

53.

Londoño

(2009). Developing human rights principles in cases of gender-based violence: Opuz v. Turkey in the European court of human rights. Human Rights Law Review, 9(4), 657–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp022

54.

Longobardo

(2020). The relevance of the concept of due diligence for international humanitarian law. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 37(1), 44–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869900.003.0011

55.

MacKinnon

C. A.

(1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Harvard University Press.

56.

MacKinnon

C. A.

(1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.

57.

Marchetti

Palumbo

(2021). Vulnerabilities between legal concepts and social realities. In Marchetti

Palumbo

(Eds.), Vulnerability in the asylum and protection system in Italy (pp. 82–104). Zenodo.

58.

Marchetti

(2013). Intersectionality. In Botti

(Ed.), The ethics of cultural diversity (pp. 133–148). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

59.

McDonald

(2019). The role of due diligence in international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(4), 1041–1054. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000344

60.

McQuigg

R. J. A.

(2017). The Istanbul Convention, domestic violence and human rights. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652436

61.

Melossi

Pavarini

(1977). Carcere e fabbrica: Alle origini del sistema penitenziario. Il Mulino.

62.

Meron

(2018). The humanization of international law. Martinus Nijhoff.

63.

Mills

L. G.

(2018). Insult to injury: Rethinking our responses to intimate abuse. Princeton University Press.

64.

Mkhize

S. P.

Maharaj

(2020). Structural violence on the margins of society: LGBT student access to health services. Agenda (Durban, South Africa), 34(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2019.1707000

65.

Office for National Statistics (2023). Crime in England and Wales: Year ending 2023. https://www.ons.gov.uk.

66.

Ollino

(2022). Due diligence obligations in international law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009053082

67.

Osservatorio sulla violenza contro le donne. (2024, 27 novembr). Le osservazioni dell’Associazione D.i.Re – Donne in rete contro la violenza sulla questione di legittimità costituzionale dell’art. 605 c.p. Sistema Penale. https://www.sistemapenale.it/it/scheda/osservatorio-sulla-violenza-contro-le-donne-n-5-2024-le-osservazioni-dellassociazione-dire-donne-in-rete-contro-la-violenza-sulla-questione-di-legittimita-costituzionale-dellart-605-cp

68.

Otto

(2006). Lost in translation: Re-scripting the sexed subjects of international human rights law. In Orford

(Ed.), International law and its others (pp. 318–356). Cambridge University Press.

69.

Otto

(2019). Queering international law: Possibilities, alliances, complicities, risks. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266787

70.

Pateman

(1988). The sexual contract. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963645

71.

Peroni

(2020). Violence against women, structural vulnerability, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Lessons for Europe?. Human Rights Law Review, 20(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509902392.ch-004

72.

Pisillo-Mazzeschi

(1992). The due diligence rule and the nature of the international responsibility of states. German Yearbook of International Law, 35, 9–51. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315242439-12

73.

Pitch

(1993). Introduction to The sexed law. Democrazia e Diritto, 3, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.3280/ded2010-001005

74.

Quinney

(1970). The social reality of crime. Little, Brown & Company.

75.

Rinaldi

(2018). Maschilità, devianze, crimine. Meltemi.

76.

Rudman

(2020). The due diligence standard: Opportunities and challenges for protecting women’s rights in international law. International Journal of Human Rights, 24(6), 780–798. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894784.005

77.

Segato

(2022). The critique of coloniality: Eight essays. Routledge.

78.

Segato

R. L.

(2003). Territory, sovereignty, and crimes of the second state: The perspective of indigenous women. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 12(1), 57–89. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392644-005

79.

Segato

R. L.

(2016). La guerra contra las mujeres. Traficantes de Sueños.

80.

Smart

(1989). Feminism and the power of law. Routledge.

81.

Smart

(1992). The woman of legal discourse. Social & Legal Studies, 1(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399200100103

82.

Therrien-Tomas

K. M.

(2021). The powers of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights towards the implementation of gender justice laws at the national level in South America. Bridges: An Undergraduate Journal of Contemporary Connections, 5(1), https://scholars.wlu.ca/bridges_contemporary_connections/vol5/iss1/6

83.

UniSAFE (2022). Gender-based violence and institutional responses: Results from the UniSAFEsurvey. https://unisafe-gbv.eu

84.

Valcore

Fradella

H. F.

Guadalupe-Díaz

, et al. (2021). Building an intersectional and trans-inclusive criminology: Responding to the emergence of “gender critical” perspectives in feminist criminology. Critical Criminology, 29(4), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-021-09590-0

85.

Victim Support Europe (2024). Victims of crime in Europe: Annual report 2024. https://victimsupport.eu.

86.

Wagner

C. Z.

Stafford

N. K.

(2022). Developing standards for gender-responsive human rights due diligence. In Lewis

Wagner

C. Z.

(Eds.), A guide to human rights due diligence for lawyers. Saint Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2022-01. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4017835

87.

Weber

(1922). Economy and society. University of California Press.

88.

World Health Organization (2024). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2024. https://www.who.int