This study examines the association between married couples’ domestic violence awareness (DVA) and emotional intelligence (EI) within a dyadic framework. Grounded in a gender-oriented and relational perspective, the study conceptualizes EI as both an individual capacity and an interpersonal resource. Using the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model, results show that higher EI is associated with greater DVA for both women and men (actor effects). Additionally, women's EI positively predicts their partners’ DVA (partner effect), whereas no reciprocal effect was observed. Findings highlight the importance of considering dyadic processes in understanding violence awareness within marital relationships.
AtamanH.BozkurtA.AkdenizCÖ (2022). Kadınların aile içinde yaşanan şiddete ilişkin farkındalık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 31(5), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.17942/sted.1149434
2.
AydinŞParlakA. G. (2022). Domestic violence awareness of students of vocational school of healthcare services and affecting factors: Descriptive cross-sectional research. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences, 14(2), 570-580. https://doi.org/10.5336/nurses.2021-84294
3.
BaşerD. A.BayarF.AvciG. I.AksoyH.Fidancıİ. (2025). Evaluating medical faculty students’ awareness and professional attitudes towards domestic violence. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 15(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1509181
DengX.ChenS.LiX.TanC.LiW.ZhongC.MeiR.YeM. (2023). Gender differences in empathy, emotional intelligence and problem-solving ability among nursing students: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 120, 105649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105649
6.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage.
7.
Estevez-CasellasC.Gómez-MedinaM. D.SitgesE. (2021). Relationship between emotional intelligence and violence exerted, received, and perceived in teen dating relationships. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052284
8.
FloodM.PeaseB. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
9.
GonzalezR.GriffinD. (2012). Dyadic data analysis. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA Handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 3. Data analysis and research publication (pp. 439–450). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13621-022
10.
GraciaE.GarcíaF.LilaM. (2009). Public responses to intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600002018
11.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
12.
JaffeA. E.SimonetD. V.TettR. P.SwopesR. M.DavisJ. L. (2015). Multidimensional trait emotional intelligence and aggressive tendencies in male offenders of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9729-3
13.
JohnsonM. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press.
14.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. *Psychological Bulletin, 118*(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
MayerJ. D.CarusoD. R.SaloveyP. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639667
17.
NeilsonE. C.GulatiN. K.StappenbeckC. A.GeorgeW. H.DavisK. C. (2023). Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence perpetration in undergraduate samples: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 24(2), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211036063
18.
ÖzyürekA.KurnazF. B. (2019). Domestic violence awareness scale: Reliability and validity. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2019.126
19.
PekaarK. A.BakkerA. B.van der LindenD.BornM. P. (2018). Self-and other-focused emotional intelligence: Development and validation of the Rotterdam Emotional Intelligence Scale (REIS). Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.045
Salguero-AlcañizM. P.Merchán-ClavellinoA.Alameda-BailénJ. R. (2023). Youth dating violence, behavioral sensitivity, and emotional intelligence: A mediation analysis. Healthcare, 11(17), 2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172445
22.
Schröder–AbéM.SchützA. (2011). Walking in each other's shoes: Perspective taking mediates effects of emotional intelligence on relationship quality. European Journal of Personality, 25(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.81
23.
StanzianiM.NewmanA. K.CoxJ.CoffeyC. A. (2020). Role call: Sex, gender roles, and intimate partner violence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(3), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1652746
24.
ŠtiglicG.CilarL.NovakŽVrbnjakD.StenhouseR.SnowdenA.PajnkiharM. (2018). Emotional intelligence among nursing students: Findings from a cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 66, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.028
25.
TanrıöğenA.TurkerY. (2019). Adaptation of Rotterdam emotional intelligence scale to Turkish. Pamukkale Unıversitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Pamukkale Unıversıty, 47, 348–369. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.514377
26.
TettR. P.FoxK. E.WangA. (2005). Development and validation of a self-report measure of emotional intelligence as a multidimensional trait domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(7), 859–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204272860
27.
TsirigotisK.ŁuczakJ. (2016). Emotional intelligence of women who experience domestic violence. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 87(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9368-0
