Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Morality and the Social Perception of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV): Women's Attributions of Prototypicality to,and Social Distancing Toward,the Victim
The present research examines laypeople's social perception of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). We explored how women's moral judgments of a female IPV victim impact psychological and social distancing. Across two experiments, participants read a scenario where the victim admitted or denied infidelity. When she admitted betrayal, participants judged her as less moral, leading to psychologically distance themselves from the victim by judging her as less prototypical of the women as a group and to keep her at a distance. Findings highlight the role of moral evaluations in shaping IPV perceptions, offering insights for educational campaigns addressing victim blaming.
BaldryA. C.PagliaroS. (2014). Helping victims of intimate partner violence: The influence of group norms among lay people and the police. Psychology of Violence, 4(3), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034844
2.
BaldryA. C.PagliaroS.PorcaroC. (2013). The rule of law in a time of masculine honor: Afghan police attitudes on intimate partner violence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(3), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212462492
3.
BaldryA. C.WinkelF. W. (1998). Perceptions of the credibility and evidential value of victim and suspect statements in interviews. Psychology and Criminal Justice: International Review of Theory and Practice, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804799.74
4.
BaldryA. C.WinkelF. W. (2008). Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach. Nova Science.
5.
BanyardV. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83
6.
BanyardV. L. (2015). Toward the next generation of bystander prevention of sexual and relationship violence: Action coils to engage communities. Springer Briefs in Criminology.
7.
BanyardV. L.MoschellaE.JourilesE.GrychJ. (2021). Exploring action coils for bystander intervention: Modeling bystander consequences. Journal of American College Health, 69(3), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1665052
8.
BellS. T.KuriloffP. J.LottesI. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students’ social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(19), 1719–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01571.x
9.
BrambillaM.HewstoneM.ColucciF. P. (2013). Enhancing moral virtues: Increased perceived outgroup morality as a mediator of intergroup contact effects. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212471737
10.
BrambillaM.LeachC. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
11.
BrambillaM.RusconiP.SacchiS.CherubiniP. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. Sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x
12.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.MenegattiM.MoscatelliS. (2016). Honesty and dishonesty don’t move together: Trait content information influences behavioral synchrony. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0229-9
13.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.PagliaroS.EllemersN. (2013b). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
14.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.RusconiP.CherubiniP.YzerbytV. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
15.
BryantS. A.SpencerG. A. (2003). University students’ attitudes about attributing blame in domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18(6), 369–376. https:// https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026205817132
16.
DexterH. R.PenrodS.LinzD.SaundersD. (1997). Attributing responsibility to female victims after exposure to sexually violent films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(24), 2149–2171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01645.x
17.
EllemersN.PagliaroS.BarretoM. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 160–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2013.841490
18.
EllemersN.PagliaroS.van NunspeetF. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge international handbook of the psychology of morality. Routledge.
19.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF031 93146
20.
FloodM.PeaseB. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
21.
GiannellaV. A.PagliaroS.BarretoM. (2022). Leader’s morality, prototypicality, and followers’ reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(4), 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101596
22.
GramazioS.CadinuM.PagliaroS.PacilliM. G. (2021). Sexualization of sexual harassment victims reduces bystanders’ help: The mediating role of attribution of immorality and blame. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, 6073–6097. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626051881632
23.
GrubbA.HarrowerJ. (2008). Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(5), 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.06.006
24.
HartS. D. (2008). Preventing violence: The role of risk assessment and management. In BaldryA. C.WinkelF. W. (Eds.), Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach (pp. 7–18). Nova Science.
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (pp. 34–40). Guilford Press.
26.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
27.
IachiniT.PagliaroS.RuggieroG. (2015). Near or far? It depends on my impression: Moral information and spatial behavior in virtual interactions. Acta Psychologica, 161, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.003
28.
JauriqueA. (2019). The role of prototypicality threat in men’s evaluations of transgender women. Dissertation.
29.
KentG. (2003). Blaming the victim, globally. Un Chronicle, 40(3), 59–60.
30.
KuskoffE.ParsellC. (2024). Bystander intervention in intimate partner violence: A scoping review of experiences and outcomes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(3), 1799–1813. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231195886
31.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?Appleton Century Crofts.
32.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. Competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
33.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Springer US.
34.
LiuY. K.BradfordB.RisteaA. (2025). A systematic review exploring cultural variables related to bystander intentions, interventions and attitudes in the context of domestic and intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-025-01001-0
35.
NisbettR. E.CohenD. (1996). Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Westview.
36.
PacilliM. G.PagliaroS.LoughnanS.GramazioS.SpaccatiniF.BaldryA. C. (2017). Sexualization reduces helping intentions towards female victims of intimate partner violence through mediation of moral patiency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(29), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12169
37.
PacilliM. G.SpaccatiniF.BalloneC.GentileE.GiovannelliI. (2022). Moral virtue, victim blaming and helping intentions towards a rape victim. The role of victim’s personality from (past) media narrative to present social perception. Psicologia Sociale, 17(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1482/104808
38.
PagliaroS.BrambillaM.SacchiS.D'AngeloM.EllemersN. (2013). Initial impressions determine behaviours: Morality predicts the willingness to help newcomers. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1508-y
39.
PagliaroS.CavazzaN.PaoliniD.TeresiM.JohnsonJ. D.PacilliM. G. (2022). Adding insult to injury: The effects of intimate partner violence spillover on the victim’s reputation. Violence Against Women, 28(6-7), 1523–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626051876061
40.
PagliaroS.EllemersN.BarretoM.Di CesareC. (2016). The impact of perceived pervasiveness of moral evaluations of the self on motivation to restore a moral reputation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00586
41.
PagliaroS.PacilliM. G.AlparoneF. R.RadognaC.Mucchi-FainaA. (2012). Ambivalence toward the ingroup underlies individual identity management strategies. Current Research in Social Psychology, 20, 21–30.
42.
PagliaroS.PacilliM. G.BaldryA. C. (2020). Bystanders’ reactions to intimate partner violence: An experimental approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1776031
43.
PagliaroS.PacilliM. G.GiannellaV. A.GiovannelliI.SpaccatiniF.BaldryA. C. (2021a). Legitimizing intimate partner violence: Moral evaluations, attribution of responsibility, and (reduced) helping. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760611
44.
PagliaroS.PaoliniD.PacilliM. G. (2021b). Intimate partner violence and same-sex couples: Examining the antecedents of the helping intentions of bystanders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, P11593–P11617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519888530
45.
ParkS.KimS.-H. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of bystander intervention programs for intimate partner violence and sexual assault. Psychology of Violence, 13(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000456
46.
PenoneG.SpaccatiniF. (2019). Attribution of blame to gender violence victims: A literature review of antecedents, consequences and measures of victim blame. Psicologia Sociale, 2, 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1482/94264
47.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one's prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1476
48.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
49.
ShaverK. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028777
50.
StewartC.MooreT.CroneT.Craft DeFreitasS.RhatiganD. (2012). Who gets blamed for intimate partner violence? The relative contributions of perpetrator sex category, victim confrontation, and observer attitudes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(18), 3739–3754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512447571
51.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks Cole.
VandelloJ. A.CohenD. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.84.5.997
54.
VonderhaarR. L.CarmodyD. C. (2015). There are no “innocent victims” the influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization on rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(10), 1615–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549196
55.
WitteT. H.SchroederD. A.LohrJ. M. (2006). Blame for intimate partner violence: An attributional analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(6), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.6.647
56.
World Health Organization. (2021). Violence Against Women Prevalence Estimates, 2018. World Health Organization.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
