This study aimed to adapt the Victim Gaslighting Questionnaire (VGQ) into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability among women in Türkiye. This methodological epidemiological study collected data between February 1 and May 1, 2024, from 568 women aged 18 years and older. Data were analyzed using SPSS and LISREL. The findings, supported by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), revealed a two-factor structure consisting of Peer Disagreement and Loss of Self-Trust, which was further confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Analyses indicated good model fit (χ²/df = 2.87, RMSEA = 0.058, CFI = 0.96). The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .91) and satisfactory subscale reliabilities. Findings suggest the Turkish VGQ is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing gaslighting.
AkdenizB.CihanH. (2024). Gaslighting and interpersonal relationships: Systematic review. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 16(1), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1281632
2.
AlparR. (2012). Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik güvenirlik (2. baskı). Detay Yayıncılık (in Turkish).
BhattiM. M.ShujaK. H.AqeelM.BokhariZ.GulzarS. N.FatimaT.SamaM. (2023). Psychometric development and validation of victim gaslighting questionnaire (VGQ): Across female sample from Pakistan. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 16(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-12-2020-0119
5.
ChristensenM.Evans-MurrayA. (2021). Gaslighting in nursing academia: A new or established covert form of bullying?Nursing Forum, 56(3), 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12588
6.
ÇoklukÖŞekercioğluG.BüyüköztürkŞ (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları (3. baskı). Pegem Akademi. (in Turkish).
7.
DicksonP.IrelandJ. L.BirchP. (2023). Gaslighting and its application to interpersonal violence. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 9(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-07-2022-0029
8.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to Omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
9.
FakunmojuS. B.BammekeF. O. (2017). Gender-based violence beliefs and stereotypes: Cross-cultural comparison across three. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(9), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2017.79.738.753
10.
HegelJ.CummingsJ.ToewsK.KnowlesL.Willcott-BenoitW.PalermoA.DeleurmeK. (2022). Women survivors of adolescent dating violence describe the maintenance of their abusive relationships: First person stories via YouTube. Violence Against Women, 29(5), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221099986
11.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
12.
İlhanM.ÇetinB. (2014). LISREL Ve AMOS Programları Kullanılarak Gerçekleştirilen Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (YEM) Analizlerine İlişkin Sonuçların Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 5(2), 26–42. in Turkish. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.31126.
13.
JohnsonV. E.NadalK. L.SissokoD. R. G.KingR. (2021). It’s not in your head”: Gaslighting, ‘splaining, victim blaming, and other harmful reactions to microaggressions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211011963
14.
KaragözY. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nitel-nicel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği (1. Baskı), Nobel. (in Turkish).
15.
KhanK.TariqN. S.MajeedS. (2024). Psychological impact of medical gaslighting on women: A systematic review. Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology, 5(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v5i1.249
16.
KleinW. B.WoodS.BartzJ. (2023). You think I’m insane: An integrative review and novel theoretical framework for studying the phenomenon of gaslighting. PsyArXiv.
MurphyC. M.HooverS. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 39–53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10397625/ https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.39
19.
RussellD.SpenceN.ChaseJ.SchwartzT.TumminelloC.BouldinE. (2022). Support amid uncertainty: Long COVID illness experiences and the role of online communities. Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100177
20.
Scotts-BahleJ. (2020). Exploring Male Students’ Lived Experiences of Intimate Partner Abuse from a Female Partner and Help-seeking [Thesis]. Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington.
21.
Seçerİ. (2015). SPSS ve Lisrel ile pratik veri analizi (2. Baskı). Anı. (in Turkish).
22.
ŞimşekÖ. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş temel ilkeler ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ekinoks(in Turkish).
23.
SternR. (2007). The gaslight effect: How to Spot And Survive The Hidden Manipulation Others Use To Control Your Life (2nd ed.). Harmony.
24.
SternR. (2018). The gaslight effect: How to spot and survive the hidden manipulation others use to control your life (3rd ed.). Harmony.
25.
Tager-ShafrirT.SzepsenwolO.DvirM.ZamirO. (2024). The gaslighting relationship exposure inventory: Reliability and validity in two cultures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(10), 3123–3146. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241266942
26.
Toplu DemirtaşE.Hatipoğlu SümerZ.MurphyC. M. (2018). Turkish version of the multidimensional measure of emotional abuse (MMEA-TR): Preliminary psychometrics in college students. Violence and Victims, 33(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.v33.i2.087
