The Potential Effectiveness of an Online Gender-Based Violence Prevention Program for European Students—The Role of Gender Essentialism,Ambivalent Sexism,and Perceived Responsiveness of the University
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2026
The Potential Effectiveness of an Online Gender-Based Violence Prevention Program for European Students—The Role of Gender Essentialism,Ambivalent Sexism,and Perceived Responsiveness of the University
This study evaluates the potential effectiveness of an online course concerning gender-based violence prevention, which combines the bystander intervention approach and the myths-based approach. The sample consists of 67 students who participated in three measurements—before the course, immediately after the course, and 3 months later. Gender-based violence myth acceptance decreased, and bystander efficacy increased after the course. The effects were the strongest among people with high ambivalent sexism and gender essentialism. The results suggest that the course was effective; however, a replication on a bigger and more diverse sample is needed.
AbbeyA.Jacques-TiuraA. J.LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20399
2.
Alegría-FloresK.RakerK.PleasantsR. K.WeaverM. A.WeinbergerM. (2017). Preventing interpersonal violence on college campuses: The effect of one act training on bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(7), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515587666
3.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
4.
AmarA. F.TuccinardiN.HeisleinJ.SimpsonS. (2015). Friends helping friends: A nonrandomized control trial of a peer-based response to dating violence. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2015.01.004
5.
AngeloneD. J.CantorN.MarcantonioT.JoppaM. (2020). Does sexism mediate the gender and rape myth acceptance relationship?Violence Against Women, 27(6–7), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220913632
6.
AzimiA. M.FlemingJ. C.HayesB. E. (2021). Victimization prevention and awareness on college campuses: Interconnection between Title IX and #MeToo. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09586-6
7.
BanyardV. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83
8.
BarnR.PowersR. A. (2021). Rape myth acceptance in contemporary times: A comparative study of university students in India and the United Kingdom. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), 3514–3535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518775750
9.
BendixenM.KennairL. E. O. (2017). When less is more: Psychometric properties of Norwegian short-forms of the Ambivalent Sexism Scales (ASI and AMI) and the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRMA) Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(6), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12392
10.
BossonJ. K.ParrottD. J.SwanS. C.KuchynkaS. L.SchrammA. T. (2015). A dangerous boomerang: Injunctive norms, hostile sexist attitudes, and male-to-female sexual aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41(6), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21597
11.
BrehmJ. W.ColeA. H. (1966). Effect of a favor which reduces freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(4), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023034
12.
BroussardK. A.WarnerR. H. (2019). Gender nonconformity is perceived differently for cisgender and transgender targets. Sex Roles, 80(7–8), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0947-z
13.
CaresA. C.BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.WilliamsL. M.PotterS. J.StapletonJ. G. (2015). Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: Translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus. Violence Against Women, 21(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214564681
14.
CarlsonM. (2008). I’d rather go along and be considered a man: Masculinity and bystander intervention. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1601.3
15.
ChapleauK. M.OswaldD. L.RussellB. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2
16.
ChingB. H.-H.XuJ. T. (2018). The effects of gender neuroessentialism on transprejudice: An experimental study. Sex Roles, 78(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0786-3
17.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.ClearE. R.BrancatoC. J.McCauleyH. L. (2020). Bystander program effectiveness to reduce violence and violence acceptance within sexual minority male and female high school students using a cluster RCT. Prevention Science, 21(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01073-7
18.
CollingsS. J. (1997). Development, reliability, and validity of the Child Sexual Abuse Myth Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(5), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626097012005004
19.
CoulterR. W. S.MairC.MillerE.BlosnichJ. R.MatthewsD. D.McCauleyH. L. (2017). Prevalence of past-year sexual assault victimization among undergraduate students: Exploring differences by and intersections of gender identity, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity. Prevention Science, 18(6), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0762-8
20.
Council of Europe’s Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence [Istanbul Convention]. (2011). Article 3d. https://rm.coe.int/168008482e
21.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
22.
Elias-LambertN.BlackB. M. (2016). Bystander sexual violence prevention program: Outcomes for high- and low-risk university men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3211–3235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584346
FakunmojuS. B. (2022). “She lied”: Relationship between gender stereotypes and beliefs and perception of rape across four countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(2), 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02119-0
26.
FakunmojuS. B.Abrefa-GyanT.MaphosaN.GuturaP. (2021). Rape myth acceptance: Gender and cross-national comparisons across the United States, South Africa, Ghana, and Nigeria. Sexuality & Culture, 25(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09755-z
27.
FentonR. A.MottH. L. (2017). The bystander approach to violence prevention: Considerations for implementation in Europe. Psychology of Violence, 7(3), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000104
28.
FentonR. A.MottH. L. (2018). Evaluation of the intervention initiative: A bystander intervention program to prevent violence against women in universities. Violence and Victims, 33(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00074
GergerH.KleyH.BohnerG.SieblerF. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 33(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
31.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
32.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
33.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.AdetounB.OsagieJ. E.AkandeA.AlaoA.AnnetjeB.WillemsenT. M.ChipetaK.DardenneB.DijksterhuisA.WigboldusD.EckesT.Six-MaternaI.,ExpósitoF., …LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
34.
GulP.SchusterI. (2020). Judgments of marital rape as a function of honor culture, masculine reputation threat, and observer gender: A cross-cultural comparison between Turkey, Germany, and the UK. Aggressive Behavior, 46(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21893
35.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164363
HillS.MarshallT. C. (2018). Beliefs about sexual assault in India and Britain are explained by attitudes toward women and hostile sexism. Sex Roles, 79(7), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0880-6
38.
HineB. A.MurphyA. D.ChurchyardJ. S. (2021). Development and validation of the Male Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (MRMAS). Heliyon, 7(6), e07421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07421
39.
JewkesR.SikweyiyaY.MorrellR.DunkleK. (2011). Gender inequitable masculinity and sexual entitlement in rape perpetration South Africa: Findings of a cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 6(12), e29590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029590
40.
JourilesE. N.KleinsasserA.RosenfieldD.McDonaldR. (2016). Measuring bystander behavior to prevent sexual violence: Moving beyond self reports. Psychology of Violence, 6, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038230
41.
JourilesE. N.KraussA.VuN. L.BanyardV. L.McDonaldR. (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906
42.
JourilesE. N.McDonaldR.RosenfieldD.LevyN.SargentK.CaiozzoC.GrychJ. H. (2016). TakeCARE, a video bystander program to help prevent sexual violence on college campuses: Results of two randomized, controlled trials. Psychology of Violence, 6(3), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000016
43.
JourilesE.Sargent FrancoK.SalisK.CaiozzoC.RosenfieldD.CascardiM.GrychJ.O’LearyK. D.McDonaldR. (2017). TakeCARE, a video to promote bystander behavior on college campuses: Replication and extension. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5652–5675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517718189
44.
JozkowskiK. N.WillisM.HurdL. E.HamL. S.BridgesA. J.Wiersma-MosleyJ. D. (2021). The interaction of rape myth acceptance and alcohol intoxication on bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), NP10066–NP10076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519863720
KellerJ. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686
48.
KonopkaK.PrusikM.SzulawskiM. (2020). Two sexes, two genders only: Measuring attitudes toward transgender individuals in Poland. Sex Roles, 82(9), 600–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01071-7
49.
KossM. P.DineroT. E. (1988). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb50856.x
KrumpalI. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
52.
KuntzJ. C.SearleF. (2023). Does bystander intervention training work? When employee intentions and organisational barriers collide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 2934–2956. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221104530
53.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help?Appleton Century Crofts.
54.
LeoneR. M.OylerK. N.ParrottD. J. (2021). Empathy is not enough: The inhibiting effects of rape myth acceptance on the relation between empathy and bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), 11532–11552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519900328
55.
LonswayK.CortinaL.MagleyV. (2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58, 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9367-1
56.
ŁyśA.Bargiel-MatusiewiczK.KrasuskiT.StudzińskaA. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Polish updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Current Psychology, 42(1), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01249-3
57.
ŁyśA.StudzińskaA.Bargiel-MatusiewiczK. (2021). Beliefs on sexual violence in the context of system justification theory: The role of hostile sexism and beliefs in biological origins of gender differences. Social Justice Research, 34, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00373-0
58.
ŁyśA. E.StudzińskaA.Bargiel-MatusiewiczK.NyúlB.Folkierska-ŻukowskaM. (2022). Myths concerning sexual violence toward women in Poland, Hungary, and Norway in the context of system justification theory: The role of beliefs in the biological origins of gender differences and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16647–NP16669. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211023487
59.
MalamuthN. M.LinzD.HeaveyC. L.BarnesG.AckerM. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.353
60.
MartiniM.De PiccoliN. (2020). Predicting bystander intention to intervene: The role of gender-specific system justification and rape myth acceptance for men and women. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326
61.
MartiniM.PiccoliN. (2021). Evaluation of USVreact: A staff training program to prevent sexual violence at universities. Health Education & Behavior, 48(4), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120939487
62.
McKeonB.McEwanT.LuebbersS. (2014). “It’s not really stalking if you know the person”: Measuring community attitudes that normalize, justify and minimise stalking. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.945637
63.
McMahonS. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.483715
64.
McMahonS.FarmerG. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
65.
McMahonS.PalmerJ. E.BanyardV.MurphyM.GidyczC. A. (2017). Measuring bystander behavior in the context of sexual violence prevention: Lessons learned and new directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(16), 2396–2418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591979
66.
MegíasJ. L.Toro-GarcíaV.Carretero-DiosH. (2018). The Acceptance of Myths About Intimate Partner Violence Against Women (AMIVAW) Scale: Development and validation in Spanish and English. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317742638
67.
MontoyaA. K. (2019). Moderation analysis in two-instance repeated measures designs: Probing methods and multiple moderator models. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1088-6
68.
MoriL.BernatJ. A.GlennP. A.SelleL. L.ZarateM. G. (1995). Attitudes toward rape: Gender and ethnic differences across Asian and Caucasian college students. Sex Roles, 32(7), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544182
69.
MortonT. A.PostmesT.HaslamS. A.HornseyM. J. (2009). Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012966
70.
MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.CaresA. C.PotterS. J.WilliamsL. M.StapletonJ. G. (2015). Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: What program effects remain 1 year later?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(1), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514532719
71.
MujalG. N.TaylorM. E.FryJ. L.Gochez-KerrT. H.WeaverN. L. (2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587
72.
NagamatsuM.OoshigeN.SonodaN.NiinaM.HaraK. (2021). Development of a program to prevent sexual violence among teens in Japan: Education using DVD video teaching materials and web-based learning. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 26(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-021-00964-y
73.
OesterleD. W.OrchowskiL. M.BerkowitzA. D. (2023). Rape myth acceptance and sexual aggression among college men: Examining perceived peer approval as a moderating risk factor. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 32(10), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2023.2177572
74.
PacilliM. G.PagliaroS.TaurinoA.SpaccatiniF.GiovannelliI.MassaroG.CaporaleF. (2017). Impact of gender essentialism on heterosexuals’ negative attitudes toward same-sex parenting. Psicologia Sociale, 12(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1482/87888
75.
PerssonS.DhingraK.GroganS. (2018). Attributions of victim blame in stranger and acquaintance rape: A quantitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(13–14), 2640–2649. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14351
76.
PotterS. J.MoynihanM. M.StapletonJ. G. (2011). Using social self-identification in social marketing materials aimed at reducing violence against women on campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(5), 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510365870
77.
PowersR. A.LeiliJ. (2018). Bar training for active bystanders: Evaluation of a community-based bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 24(13), 1614–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217741219
RebeizM. J.HarbC. (2010). Perceptions of rape and attitudes toward women in a sample of Lebanese students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(4), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334410
80.
Sakallı-UğurluN.YalçınZ. S.GlickP. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57(11–12), 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2
81.
SalazarL. F.Vivolo-KantorA.HardinJ.BerkowitzA. (2014). A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(9), e203. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3426
82.
ScheweP. A. (2008). Interventions to prevent sexual violence. In Handbook of injury and violence prevention (pp. 223–240). Springer.
83.
SennC. Y.EliasziwM.BarataP. C.ThurstonW. E.Newby-ClarkI. R.RadtkeH. L.HobdenK. L. (2014). Sexual violence in the lives of first-year university women in Canada: No improvements in the 21st century. BMC Women’s Health, 14(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-014-0135-4
84.
SkewesL.FineC.HaslamN. (2018). Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash. PLoS One, 13(7), e0200921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200921
SteinmetzS. E.GrayM. J.RaymondE. M. (2019). Reducing rape-related attitudes utilizing a cognitive dissonance paradigm. Violence Against Women, 25(14), 1739–1758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218824999
87.
StephensT.KamimuraA.YamawakiN.BhattacharyaH.MoW.BirkholzR.MakomenawA.OlsonL. M. (2016). Rape myth acceptance among college students in the United States, Japan, and India. Sage Open, 6(4), 2158244016675015. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016675015
88.
StoreyJ. E.PinaA.WilliamsC. S. (2023). The impact of stalking and its predictors: Characterizing the needs of stalking victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(21–22), 11569–11594. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231185303
89.
StudzińskaA.WojciszkeB. (2014). Przekonania o genezie różnic płci a legitymizacja nierówności kobiet i mężczyzn [Beliefs in origins of sex differences and legitimization of inequality of men and women]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychological Bulletin], 9(31), 396–408.
90.
SüssenbachP.EuteneuerF. (2022). Rape myth acceptance and psychopathy as interacting predictors of rape proclivity. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 30(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2151657
91.
SwiggerN.MeyerM. (2019). Gender essentialism and responses to candidates’ messages. Political Psychology, 40(4), 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12556
92.
TrottierD.BenbouricheM.BonnevilleV. (2021). A meta-analysis on the association between rape myth acceptance and sexual coercion perpetration. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(3), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1704677
WardC. (1995). Attitudes toward rape. Feminist and social psychological perspectives. Sage.
96.
WiltonL. S.BellA. N.CarpinellaC. M.YoungD. M.MeyersC.ClaphamR. (2019). Lay theories of gender influence support for women and transgender people’s legal rights. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(7), 883–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618803608
97.
YamawakiN.TschanzB. T. (2005). Rape perception differences between Japanese and American college students: On the mediating influence of gender role traditionality. Sex Roles, 52(5–6), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2680-7
98.
YoungB.-R.DesmaraisS. L.BaldwinJ. A.ChandlerR. (2017). Sexual coercion practices among undergraduate male recreational athletes, intercollegiate athletes, and non-athletes. Violence Against Women, 23(7), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216651339
99.
YountK.MinhT.TrangQ.CheongY.BergenfeldI.SalesJ. (2020). Preventing sexual violence in college men: A randomized-controlled trial of GlobalConsent. BMC Public Health, 20, 1331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09454-2
