The present study used mixed methods to advance understanding of positive life changes and perceived growth following intimate partner abuse (IPA), focusing on coercive controlling violence. Women completed open-ended interview questions about positive changes and growth following divorce. Seven domains of positive changes and twelve domains of perceived growth were coded. Quantitative IPA measures assessed prior exposure to direct assault and dominance/isolation abuse. Positive changes in self-improvement, relationships, and internal self were common, as was growth in self-concept and independence. Improved financial situation was an unanticipated positive change. No statistically significant associations between IPA measures and overall counts of positive changes or growth were observed. Methodological considerations for studies of IPA-related growth are discussed.
AndersonD. K.SaundersD. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838002250769
2.
AnsaraD. L.HindinM. J. (2010). Formal and informal help-seeking associated with women's and men's experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 70(7), 1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.009
3.
BakaityteA.KaniusonyteG.Truskauskaite-KunevicieneI.ZukauskieneR. (2022). Longitudinal investigation of posttraumatic growth in female survivors of intimate partner violence: The role of event centrality and identity exploration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), NP1058–NP1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520920864
4.
BakaityteA.KaniusonyteG.ZukauskieneR. (2022). Posttraumatic growth, centrality of event, trauma symptoms and resilience: Profiles of women survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP20168–NP20189. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211050110
5.
BoalsA. (2023). Illusory posttraumatic growth is common, but genuine posttraumatic growth is rare: A critical review and suggestions for a path forward. Clinical Psychology Review, 103, 102301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102301
6.
BoalsA.JayawickremeE.ParkC. L. (2022). Advantages of distinguishing perceived and veridical growth: Recommendations for future research on both constructs. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(5), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2109200
7.
CobbA. R.TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G.CannA. (2006). Correlates of posttraumatic growth in survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(6), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20171
8.
CoxeS.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175
9.
D'AmoreC.MartinS. L.WoodK.BrooksC. (2021). Themes of healing and posttraumatic growth in women survivors’ narratives of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), NP2697–NP2724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518767909
10.
DekelS.Ein-DorT.SolomonZ. (2012). Posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic distress: A longitudinal study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021865
11.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2011). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–19). Sage.
12.
EldertonA.BerryA.ChanC. (2017). A systematic review of posttraumatic growth in survivors of interpersonal violence in adulthood. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015611672
13.
FlaschP.MurrayC. E.CroweA. (2017). Overcoming abuse: A phenomenological investigation of the journey to recovery from past intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(22), 3373–3401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515599161
14.
FrazierP.ConlonA.GlaserT. (2001). Positive and negative life changes following sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(6), 1048–1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.1048
15.
GoldbergX.EspeltC.Porta-CasterasD.PalaoD.NadalR.ArmarioA. (2021). Non-communicable diseases among women survivors of intimate partner violence: Critical review from a chronic stress framework. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 128, 720–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.045
16.
GoodfriendW.Lassiter SimcokP. (2022). Entrapment, escape, and elevation from relationship violence. Cambridge University Press.
17.
HardestyJ. L.CrossmanK. A.HaselschwerdtM. L.RaffaelliM.OgolskyB. G.JohnsonM. P. (2015). Toward a standard approach to operationalizing coercive control and classifying violence types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12201
18.
JohnsonB.TurnerL. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 297–319). Sage.
19.
JohnsonS. F.BoalsA. (2015). Refining our ability to measure posttraumatic growth. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 7(5), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000013
20.
KunstM. J. J.WinkelF. W.BogaertsS. (2010). Posttraumatic growth moderates the association between violent revictimisation and persisting PTSD symptoms in victims of interpersonal violence. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 29(5), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.5.527
21.
LeemisR. W.FriarN.KhatiwadaS.ChenM. S.KresnowM.SmithS. G.CaslinS.BasileK. C. (2022). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2016/2017 report on intimate partner violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs/nisvsreportonipv_2022.pdf
22.
Machinga-AsaoluR. O. (2024). Post-traumatic growth promoting and inhibiting factors among intimate partner violence survivors: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15248380241291075. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241291075
23.
NewtonT. L.Fernandez-BotranR.MillerJ. J.LorenzD. J.BurnsV. E.FlemingK. N. (2011). Markers of inflammation in midlife women with intimate partner violence histories. Journal of Women's Health, 20(12), 1871–1880. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2011.2788
24.
OkeM. (2008). The value of narrative in understanding Mongolian and Australian women's journeys of survival recovery and remaking of self, through and beyond domestic violence. Women's Studies International Forum, 31(6), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2008.09.006
25.
Ouellet-MorinI.FisherH. L.York-SmithM.Fincham-CampbellS.MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL. (2015). Intimate partner violence and new-onset depression: A longitudinal study of women's childhood and adult histories of abuse. Depression & Anxiety, 32(5), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22347
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. American Psychological Association.
28.
PostmusJ. L.HogeG. L.BreckenridgeJ.Sharp-JeffsN.ChungD. (2020). Economic abuse as an invisible form of domestic violence: A multicountry review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018764160
29.
Russell BernardH.RyanG. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage.
30.
SmithM. E. (2003). Recovery from intimate partner violence: A difficult journey. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 24(5), 543–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840305290
31.
SongL. Y. (2012). Service utilization, perceived changes of self, and life satisfaction among women who experienced intimate partner abuse: The mediation effect of empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1112–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511424495
32.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
33.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019521396017003001
34.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In TashakkoriC. T. A. (Ed.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Sage.
35.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2011). Mixed methods research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 285–299). Sage.
36.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490090305
37.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
38.
TiwariA.ChanK. L.CheungD. S.FongD. Y.YanE. C.TangD. H. (2015). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence on mental health outcomes among abused Chinese women: A mixed-method study. BMC Public Health, 15, 314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1649-x
39.
TolmanR. M. (1999). The validation of the psychological maltreatment of women inventory. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.25
40.
UlloaE. C.HammettJ. F.GuzmanM. L.HokodaA. (2015). Psychological growth in relation to intimate partner violence: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.007
41.
WangA. W.ChangC. S.ChenS. T.ChenD. R.FanF.CarverC. S.HsuW. Y. (2017). Buffering and direct effect of posttraumatic growth in predicting distress following cancer. Health Psychology, 36(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000490
42.
WeststrateN. M.JayawickremeE.WrzusC. (2021). Advancing a three-tier personality framework for posttraumatic growth. European Journal of Personality, 36(4), 704–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211062327
