This study analyzed the experiences of 20 survivors of violence by partners with penal protection orders (POs) issued against them to explore the extent to which, how, and when POs (dis)empower. The results show that the extent to which POs result in survivors’ enhanced sense of safety and ability to move on with their lives is dependent on specific circumstances and the PO impact on their sense of self-efficacy, including whether they obtain PO-related knowledge, report violations, refrain from contact with the ex-partner, and expect and received support from the criminal justice system and others. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
AndersonD. K.SaundersD. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838002250769
2.
BeebleM. L.BybeeD.SullivanC. M. (2007). Abusive men’s use of children to control their partners and ex-partners. European Psychologist, 12(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.1.54
3.
BuchbinderE. (2021). The meaning of the protection order for abused women in Israel. Journal of Social Service Research, 47(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2019.1711294
4.
CattaneoL. B.ChoS.BotuckS. (2011). Describing intimate partner stalking over time: An effort to inform victim-centered service provision. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(17), 3428–3454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511403745
5.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035137
6.
CattaneoL. B.GrossmannJ.ChapmanA. R. (2016). The goals of IPV survivors receiving orders of protection: An application of the empowerment process model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(17), 2889–2911. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515581905
7.
ClevenI. W. M. (2021). Ruled by fear or safety-related empowerment: The experience and meaning of penal protection orders in intimate partner violence in The Netherlands. Erasmus Law Review, 14(3), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000202
8.
ClevenI. W. M.FischerT.StruijkS. (2020). In het belang van het slachtoffer. De bijdrage van strafrechtelijke contact-, locatie-en gebiedsverboden aan de veiligheidsbeleving van slachtoffers van geweldsdelicten en stalking. Tijdschrift Voor Criminologie, 62(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.5553/TvC/0165182X2020062001002
9.
CordierR.ChungD.Wilkes-GillanS.SpeyerR. (2021). The effectiveness of protection orders in reducing recidivism in domestic violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(4), 804–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019882361
10.
CubellsJ.CalsamigliaA. (2018). Do we see victims’ agency? Criminal justice and gender violence in Spain. Critical Criminology, 26, 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9379-2
11.
DowlingC.MorganA.HulmeS.ManningM.WongG. (2018). Protection orders for domestic violence: A systematic review. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, (551), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti116237
12.
DurfeeA. (2021). The use of structural intersectionality as a method to analyze how the domestic violence civil protective order process replicates inequality. Violence Against Women, 27(5), 639–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220958495
13.
EversJ. (2016). Kwalitatieve analyse: kunst en kunde. Boom uitgevers.
14.
FischerT.ClevenI.StruijkS.RoggeveenW. (2019). Handhaving en veiligheid bij strafrechtelijke contact-, locatie-en gebiedsverboden ter bescherming van slachtoffers. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Documentatie Centrum/Erasmus University Rotterdam.
15.
FischerK.RoseM. (1995). When ‘enough is enough’: Battered women’s decision-making around court orders of protection. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128795041004003
16.
Fleury-SteinerR. E.Fleury-SteinerB. D.MillerS. L. (2011). More than a piece of paper? Protection orders as a resource for battered women. Sociology Compass, 5(7), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00383.x
17.
FritscheO. M. (2014). The role of enticement in a violation of a protection order. Washington & Lee Law Review, 71(2), 1473–1518. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/role-enticement-violation-protection-order/docview/1534524512/se-2?accountid=13598
18.
GoodmanL. A.CattaneoL. B.ThomasK.WoulfeJ.ChongS. K.SmythK. F. (2015). Advancing domestic violence program evaluation: Development and validation of the measure of victim empowerment related to safety (MOVERS). Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 355. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038318
19.
GoodmanL.DuttonM. A.WeinfurtK.CookS. (2003). The intimate partner violence strategies index: Development and application. Violence Against Women, 9(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801202239004
HefnerM. K.MillerS. L.Fleury-SteinerR. E. (2022). Legal consciousness and intimate partner violence survivors’ perceptions of protection order violations. Journal of Family Violence, 37(8), 1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00336-8
22.
JohnsonJ. M.LunaY.SteinJ. (2003). Victim protection orders and the stake in conformity thesis. Journal of Family Violence, 18(6), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026245531244
23.
KeilitzS. L.HannafordP. L.EfkemanH. S. (1997). Civil protection orders: The benefits and limitations for victims of domestic violence: Executive summary. Department of Justice.
24.
KellyL.AdlerJ. R.HorvathM. A.LovettJ.CoulsonM.KernohanD.GrayM. (2013). Evaluation of the pilot of domestic violence protection orders. Home Office.
25.
LoganT. K.WalkerR. T. (2010). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper?Violence and Victims, 25(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.332
26.
LoganT. K.WalkerR.HoytW.FaragherT. (2009). The Kentucky Civil Protective Order Study: A Rural and Urban Multiple Perspective Study of Protective Order Violation Consequences, Responses, & Costs. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228350.pdf
27.
LoganT. K.WalkerR.ShannonL.ColeJ. (2008). Factors associated with separation and ongoing violence among women with civil protective orders. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9164-9
28.
McFarlaneJ.SymesL.MaddouxJ.GilroyH.KociA. (2014). Is length of shelter stay and receipt of a protection order associated with less violence and better functioning for abused women? Outcome data four months after receiving services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(15), 2748–2774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514526060
29.
MillerS. L.SmolterN. L. (2011). ‘Paper abuse’: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211407290
30.
NeilsonL. C. (2015). Enhancing civil protection in domestic violence cases: Cross Canada checkup. Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research University of New Brunswick.
31.
NicholsA. J. (2013). Survivor-defined practices to mitigate revictimization of battered women in the protective order process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1403–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468243
32.
Rijksoverheid. (2018). Geweld hoort nergens thuis: aanpak Huiselijk Geweld en kindermishandeling. Ministry of Justice and Safety, Ministry of Health, Wellbeing and Sport and Association of Dutch Municipalities (VNG).
33.
SmallM. L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’ on science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586
34.
SullivanC. M.GoodmanL. A. (2019). Advocacy with survivors of intimate partner violence: What it is, what it isn’t, and why it’s critically important. Violence Against Women, 25(16), 2007–2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875826
35.
SullivanT. P.WeissN. H.WoernerJ.WyattJ.CareyC. (2021). Criminal orders of protection for domestic violence: Associated revictimization, mental health, and well-being among victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21–22), 10198–10219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519883865
36.
Van der AaS.LensK. M. E.Klerx-van MierloF.BosmaA. K.van den BoschM. (2013). Aard, omvang en handhaving van beschermingsbevelen in Nederland: Deel 2: Aard en omvang. INTERVICT.
37.
Van der AaS.NiemiJ.SosaL.FerreiraA.BaldryA. (2015). Mapping the legislation and assessing the impact of protection orders in the European member states. Wolf Legal Publishers.
38.
Van RooijF. B.Ten HaafJ.VerhoeffA. P. (2013). Temporary restraining orders in The Netherlands: A qualitative examination of perpetrator and victim views. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9520-2
39.
WilcoxK. (2010). Recent innovations in Australian protection order law: A comparative discussion. Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse.
