Endorsing problematic sexual violence-related attitudes including rape myth acceptance (RMA), hostile sexism, and disapproval of sexual consent is associated with negative outcomes, including the perpetration of sexual violence. This study examined social connections as a protective factor for sexual violence-related attitudes among a sample of 770 participants. Results indicate that in the full sample, connections to a workplace were protective for RMA and hostile sexism while family connections were protective for disapproval of sexual consent, RMA, and hostile sexism. Patterns of other social connections differed in separate models for men and women. Unexpected findings indicating that connections to a religious social group are a risk, not a protective, factor are discussed.
AbramsD.VikiG. T.MasserB.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12518974
2.
BarnettM. D.SligarK. B.WangC. D. C. (2018). Religious affiliation, religiosity, gender, and rape myth acceptance: Feminist theory and rape culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(8), 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516665110
BasileK. C.RostadW. L.LeemisR. W.EspelageD. L.DavisJ. P. (2018). Protective factors for sexual violence: Understanding how trajectories relate to perpetration in high school. Prevention Science, 19(8), 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0940-3
5.
BogenK. W.MullaM. M. M.OrchowskiL. M. (2022). Gender-equitable attitudes, rape myth acceptance, and perceived peer acceptance of violence among high school students: An examination of gender and athletic involvement. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7–8), NP5009–NP5025. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520958649.
6.
BossonJ. K.ParrottD. J.SwanS. C.KuchynkaS. L.SchrammA. T. (2015). A dangerous boomerang: Injunctive norms, hostile sexist attitudes, and male-to-female sexual aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41(6), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21597
7.
BrownA.LeiteA. C. (2023). The effects of social and organizational connectedness on employee well-being and remote working experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12934
8.
CaseyE. A.BeadnellB.LindhorstT. P. (2009). Predictors of sexually coercive behavior in a nationally representative sample of adolescent males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(7), 1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508322198
9.
CulybaA. J.MillerE.AlbertS. M.AbebeK. Z. (2019). Co-occurrence of violence-related risk and protective behaviors and adult support among male youth in urban neighborhoods. JAMA Network Open, 2(9), e1911375–e1911375. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11375
10.
EnszS.JankowskiP. J. (2020). Religiousness and rape myth acceptance: Risk and protective effects. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7–8), 1671–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517698281
11.
EspelageD. L.RulisonK. L.IngramK. M.ValidoA.Schmeelk-ConeK.WymanP. A. (2022). Social networks of adolescent sexual violence perpetrators: Peer friendship and trusted adult characteristics. Prevention Science, 23(1), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01296-7
12.
FerragutM.BlancaM. J.Ortiz-TalloM. (2013). Psychological values as protective factors against sexist attitudes in preadolescents. Psicothema, 25(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.85
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
15.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
16.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
17.
HagenT.ThompsonM. P.WilliamsJ. (2018). Religiosity reduces sexual aggression and coercion in a longitudinal cohort of college men: Mediating roles of peer norms, promiscuity, and pornography. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 57(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12496
18.
HirschJ. S.KhanS. R.WamboldtA.MellinsC. A. (2019). Social dimensions of sexual consent among cisgender heterosexual college students: Insights from ethnographic research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.011
19.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2021). The major health implications of social connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421999630
20.
HumphreysT. P.BrousseauM. M. (2010). The sexual consent scale-revised: Development, reliability, and preliminary validity. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903151358
21.
Jacques-TiuraA. J.AbbeyA.WegnerR.PierceJ.PegramS. E.WoernerJ. (2015). Friends matter: Protective and harmful aspects of male friendships associated with past-year sexual aggression in a community sample of young men. American Journal of Public Health, 105(5), 1001–1007. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302472
22.
JavidiH.MaheuxA. J.WidmanL.KamkeK.Choukas-BradleyS.PetersonZ. D. (2020). Understanding adolescents’ attitudes toward affirmative consent. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(9), 1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1711009
KaczkowskiW.BrennanC. L.SwartoutK. M. (2017). In good company: Social network diversity may protect men against perpetrating sexual violence. Psychology of Violence, 7(2), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040295
25.
KingreeJ. B.ThompsonM.RuetzE. (2017). Heavy episodic drinking and sexual aggression among male college students: The protective influence of church attendance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(4), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586372
26.
KjellgrenC.PriebeG.SvedinC. G.MossigeS.LångströmN. (2011). Female youth who sexually coerce: Prevalence, risk, and protective factors in two national high school surveys. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(12), 3354–3362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01495.x
27.
LeahyK. E.ChopikW. J. (2020). The effect of social network size and composition on the link between discrimination and health among sexual minorities. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(9), 1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264320908982
28.
MainwaringC.GabbertF.ScottA. J. (2023). A systematic review exploring variables related to bystander intervention in sexual violence contexts. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221079660
29.
McGirrS.Pynnonen HopkinsD.FluegemanS.StechschulteA. (2019). Data sharing policy for the Michigan sexual violence prevention survey. Center for Healthy Communities, MPHI.
30.
McMahonS.FarmerL. G. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
31.
MennickeA.KennedyS. C.GromerJ.Klem-O’ConnorM. (2018). Evaluation of a social norms sexual violence prevention marketing campaign targeted toward college men: Attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors over 5 years. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), NP3999–NP4021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518780411
32.
MuehlenhardC. L.HumphreysT. P.JozkowskiK. N.PetersonZ. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
33.
NagelB.MatsuoH.McIntyreK. P.MorrisonN. (2005). Attitudes toward victims of rape: Effects of gender, race, religion, and social class. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(6), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505276072
O’ConnorJ.Ben KhallouqB.McMahonS.ToohyK.SmithL. (2024). Protective factors for men’s endorsement of rape myths. Victims & Offenders, 1–21.
36.
O'ConnorJ.McMahonS.CusanoJ.SeabrookR. C.GraceyL. (2021). Predictors of campus sexual violence perpetration: A systematic review of research, sampling, and study design. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101607
37.
O’ConnorJ.SmithL.WoernerJ.KhanA. (2024). Protective factors for sexual violence perpetration among high school and college students: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(2), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231171189.
38.
OrchowskiL. M. (2019). “Trouble in paradigm” and the social norms approach to violence prevention. Violence Against Women, 25(14), 1672–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219872561
39.
PrinaF.Schatz-StevensJ. N. (2020). Sexism and rape myth acceptance: The impact of culture, education, and religiosity. Psychological Reports, 123(3), 929–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119826896
40.
Reynolds-TylusT.LukacenaK. M.QuickB. L. (2019). An application of the theory of normative social behavior to bystander intervention for sexual assault. Journal of American College Health, 67(6), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1499648
41.
Riegle-CrumbC.CallahanR. M. (2009). Exploring the academic benefits of friendship ties for Latino boys and girls*. Social Science Quarterly, 90(3), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00634.x
42.
RodriguesP.HébertM.PhilibertM. (2023). Neighborhood social support and social participation as predictors of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(13–14), 8400–8421. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231155130
43.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
44.
ScarboroughW. J.SinR.RismanB. (2019). Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender & Society, 33(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218809604
45.
Schipani-McLaughlinA. M.LeoneR. M.SalazarL. F.SwahnM. H.KhaderS. (2023). Knowledge of sexual consent as a protective factor against sexual violence perpetration among first-year college men: A moderation analysis. Health Education Research, 38(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyac037
46.
SeabrookR. C.WardL. M.GiaccardiS. (2018). Why is fraternity membership associated with sexual assault? Exploring the roles of conformity to masculine norms, pressure to uphold masculinity, and objectification of women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000076
SteeleB.MartinM.YakubovichA.HumphreysD. K.NyeE. (2022). Risk and protective factors for men's sexual violence against women at higher education institutions: A systematic and meta-analytic review of the longitudinal evidence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(3), 716–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020970900
50.
StoddardS. A.McMorrisB. J.SievingR. E. (2011). Do social connections and hope matter in predicting early adolescent violence?American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9387-9
51.
StollL. C.LilleyT. G.PinterK. (2017). Gender-blind sexism and rape myth acceptance. Violence Against Women, 23(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216636239
52.
SwartoutK. M. (2013). The company they keep: How peer networks influence male sexual aggression. Psychology of Violence, 3(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029997
53.
TaylorS. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). Oxford University Press.
54.
TharpA. T.DeGueS.ValleL. A.BrookmeyerK. A.MassettiG. M.MatjaskoJ. L. (2012). A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012470031
55.
UmbersonD.ChenM. D.HouseJ. S.HopkinsK.SlatenE. (1996). The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: Are men and women really so different?American Sociological Review, 61(5), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096456
56.
ValidoA.Rivas-KoehlM.EspelageD. L.RobinsonL. E.KuehlT.MintzS.WymanP. A. (2021). Protective factors of homophobic name-calling and sexual violence perpetration and victimization among LGB, trans, and heterosexual high school students. School Mental Health, 13(3), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09453-7
57.
WalshK.SarvetA. L.WallM.GilbertL.SantelliJ.KhanS.ThompsonM. P.ReardonL.HirschJ. S.MellinsC. A. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of sexual assault perpetration and ambiguous consent in a representative sample of college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), NP7005–NP7026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518823293
58.
WarrenP.SwanS.AllenC. T. (2015). Comprehension of sexual consent as a key factor in the perpetration of sexual aggression among college men. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(8), 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1070232
59.
WatermanE. A.BanyardV. L.EdwardsK. M.MauerV. A. (2022). Youth perceptions of prevention norms and peer violence perpetration and victimization: A prospective analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 48(4), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22024
60.
YangK.GirgusJ. S. (2019). Are women more likely than men are to care excessively about maintaining positive social relationships? A meta-analytic review of the gender difference in sociotropy. Sex Roles, 81(3–4), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0980-y
61.
YappE. J.QuayleE. (2018). A systematic review of the association between rape myth acceptance and male-on-female sexual violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.002
62.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J.PalmerN. A.ReisnerS. L. (2015). Online social support as a buffer against online and offline peer and sexual victimization among US LGBT and non-LGBT youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 39, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
