Whom Would You Help? The Impact of Perpetrator and Victim Gender on Bystander Behavior During a Sexual Assault

Abstract

We examined the impact of perpetrator and victim gender on bystander helping choices and assault perceptions. Participants (32 females, 37 males) read about two simultaneously occurring sexual assaults, indicated which victim they would help, and gave their perceptions of the assaults. We used a within-participants design that fully manipulated the perpetrator and victim gender for both assaults. Results showed female victims of male perpetrators and male victims of female perpetrators were most and least likely to be chosen for help, respectively. Cognitive networks derived from open-ended responses provided insight into the rationale used by participants to make helping decisions in ways that differed by perpetrator and victim gender.

Keywords

bystander behavior sexual violence gender cognitive networks sentiment analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alegría-Flores

Raker

Pleasants

R. K.

Weaver

M. A.

Weinberger

(2017). Preventing interpersonal violence on college campuses: The effect of one act training on bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(7), 1103–1126.

Allnock

Atkinson

(2019). ‘Snitches get stitches’: School specific barriers to victim disclosure and peer reporting of sexual harm committed by young people in school contexts. Child Abuse & Neglect, 89, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.025

Banyard

V. L.

Rizzo

A. J.

Edwards

K. M.

(2020). Community actionists: Understanding adult bystanders to sexual and domestic violence prevention in communities. Psychology of Violence, 10(5), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000281

Basile

K. C.

Smith

S. G.

Kresnow

Khatiwada

Leemis

R. W.

(2022). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2016/2017 report on sexual violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs/nisvsreportonsexualviolence.pdf

Bates

E. A.

(2020). “No one would ever believe me”: An exploration of the impact of intimate partner violence victimization on men. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(4), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000206

Bennett

Banyard

V. L.

Edwards

K. M.

(2017). The impact of the bystander’s relationship with the victim and the perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(5), 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586373

Bethke

T. M.

DeJoy

D. M.

(1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626093008001003

Burn

S. M.

(2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60(11), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5

10.

Centers for Disease Control. (2023). Presenting sexual violence. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html

11.

Chabot

H. F.

Tracy

T. L.

Manning

C. A.

Poisson

C. A.

(2009). Sex, attribution, and severity influence intervention decisions of informal helpers in domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(10), 1696–1713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509331514

12.

Christie

(1986). The ideal victim. In Anttila

(Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy (pp. 17–30). Palgrave Macmillan.

13.

Coker

A. L.

Bush

H. M.

Fisher

B. S.

Swan

S. C.

Williams

C. M.

Clear

E. R.

DeGue

(2016). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034

14.

Coyne

Gopaul

A. M.

Campbell

Pankász

Garland

Cousans

(2019). Bystander responses to bullying at work: The role of mode, type and relationship to target. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2

15.

Cromer

L. D.

Freyd

J. J.

(2007). What influences believing child sexual abuse disclosures? The roles of depicted memory persistence, participant gender, trauma history, and sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00327.x

16.

Davies

Gilston

Rogers

(2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438281

17.

Dir

A. L.

Hahn

Jaffe

A. E.

Stanton

Gilmore

A. K.

(2021). Depressive symptoms following recent sexual assault: The role of drug and alcohol use, acute stress, and assault characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11-12), 5900–5913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518803605

18.

Dworkin

E. R.

DeCou

C. R.

Fitzpatrick

(2022). Associations between sexual assault and suicidal thoughts and behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(7), 1208–1211. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000570

19.

Edwards

K. M.

Sylaska

K. M.

Barry

J. E.

Moynihan

M. M.

Banyard

V. L.

Cohn

E. S.

Walsh

W. A.

Ward

S. K.

(2015). Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: A comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(4), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605145352

20.

Elbagir

Yang

(2019). Twitter sentiment analysis using natural language toolkit and VADER sentiment. In Ao

Castillo

Douglas

Feng

Korsunsky

A. M.

(Eds.), Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists (pp. 12–16). International Association of Engineers. https://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2019/

21.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

22.

Fischer

Greitemeyer

Pollozek

Frey

(2006). The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.297

23.

Fischer

Krueger

J. I.

Greitemeyer

Vogrincic

Kastenmüller

Frey

Heene

Wicher

Kainbacher

(2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–537.

24.

Follingstad

D. R.

C. R.

Chahal

J. K.

Renzetti

C. M.

(2021). Students’ perceptions of justice: Application of sanctions, guilt, and responsibility in campus sexual assault cases. Journal of Family Violence, 36(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00129-5

25.

Franiuk

Luca

Robinson

(2020). The effects of victim and perpetrator characteristics on ratings of guilt in a sexual assault case. Violence Against Women, 26(6–7), 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219840439

26.

Golding

J. M.

Lynch

K. R.

Malik

S. E.

Foster-Gimbel

(2018). Justice served? Perceptions of plea bargaining involving a sexual assault in child and adult females. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(4), 503–518. https://doi-org.pvamu.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0093854817743538

27.

Graham

LaChance

Wormwood

J. B.

(2023). Bystander intervention in intimate partner violence: An audio vignette study of heterosexual, gay, and lesbian dating partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 3979–4006. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221111412

28.

Hassouneh

Glass

(2008). The influence of gender role stereotyping on women's experiences of female same-sex intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 14(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207313734

29.

Heretick

D. M.

Learn

(2020). Severity of coercive sexual harassment in professor–student interaction and peer bystander responses. Journal of Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5590/JSBHS.2020.14.1.07

30.

Hine

(2019). “It can’t be that bad, I mean, he’s a guy”: Exploring judgements towards domestic violence scenarios varying on perpetrator and victim gender, and abuse type. In Bates

E. A.

Taylor

J. C.

(Eds.), Intimate partner violence: New perspectives in research and practice (pp. 43–57). Taylor & Francis Publishing.

31.

Hoxmeier

J. C.

Flay

B. R.

Acock

A. C.

(2018). Control, norms, and attitudes: Differences between students who do and do not intervene as bystanders to sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(15), 2379–2401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515625503

32.

Hoxmeier

J. C.

O’Connor

McMahon

(2019). ‘She wasn’t resisting’: Students’ barriers to prosocial intervention as bystanders to sexual assault risk situations. Violence Against Women, 25(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218790697

33.

Hurley

Allen

B. P.

(1974). The effect of the number of people present in a nonemergency situation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 92(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1974.9923068

34.

Hust

S. J.

Rodgers

K. B.

Ebreo

Stefani

(2019). Rape myth acceptance, efficacy, and heterosexual scripts in men’s magazines: Factors associated with intentions to sexually coerce or intervene. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(8), 1703–1733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516653752

35.

Hutto

Gilbert

(2014, May). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550

36.

Kassin

S. M.

(2017). The killing of Kitty Genovese: What else does this case tell us? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616679465

37.

Katz

(2015). Effects of group status and victim sex on male bystanders’ responses to a potential party rape. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(5), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1029184

38.

Katz

Colbert

Colangelo

(2015). Effects of group status and victim sex on female bystanders’ responses to a potential party rape. Violence and Victims, 30(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00099

39.

Kazerooni

Taylor

S. H.

Bazarova

N. N.

Whitlock

(2018). Cyberbullying bystander intervention: The number of offenders and retweeting predict likelihood of helping a cyberbullying victim. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(3), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy005

40.

Kettrey

H. H.

Marx

R. A.

(2021). Effects of bystander sexual assault prevention programs on promoting intervention skills and combatting the bystander effect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09417-y

41.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Resnick

H. S.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Conoscenti

M. A.

McCauley

(2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. U. S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf

42.

Latané

Darley

J. M.

(1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026570

43.

Liebst

L. S.

Heinskou

M. B.

Ejbye-Ernst

(2018). On the actual risk of bystander intervention: A statistical study based on naturally occurring violent emergencies. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427817710776

44.

Lippert

Golding

J. M.

Lynch

Haak

(2018). When a corporation rapes: Perceptions of rape in civil court for corporate defendants. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(7), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421185

45.

Loxton

Groves

(2022). Adult male victims of female-perpetrated sexual violence: Australian social media responses, myths and flipped expectations. International Review of Victimology, 28(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580211048552

46.

Lynch

K. R.

Golding

J. M.

Jewell

J. A.

Lippert

Wasarhaley

N. E.

(2019). “She is his girlfriend—I believe this is a different situation”: Gender differences in perceptions of the legality of intimate partner rape. Journal of Family Violence, 34(3), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-0006-0

47.

Mainwaring

Gabbert

Scott

A. J.

(2023). A systematic review exploring variables related to bystander intervention in sexual violence contexts. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221079660

48.

Manning

Levine

Collins

(2007). The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist, 62(6), 555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.6.555

49.

MATLAB (2022). version 9.1.3 (2022b). The MathWorks Inc.

50.

McMahon

Banyard

V. L.

(2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015

51.

McMahon

Burnham

Banyard

V. L.

(2020). Bystander intervention as a prevention strategy for campus sexual violence: Perceptions of historically minoritized college students. Prevention Science, 21(6), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01134-2

52.

McMahon

Peterson

N. A.

Winter

S. C.

Palmer

J. E.

Postmus

J. L.

Koenick

R. A.

(2015). Predicting bystander behavior to prevent sexual assault on college campuses: The role of self-efficacy and intent. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(1-2), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9740-0

53.

Mujal

G. N.

Taylor

M. E.

Fry

J. L.

Gochez-Kerr

T. H.

Weaver

N. L.

(2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587

54.

Newman

Girvan

(2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(026113), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113

55.

Nichols

Mallon

(2006). Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition, 100(3), 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.005

56.

Oesterle

D. W.

Orchowski

L. M.

Moreno

Berkowitz

(2018). A qualitative analysis of bystander intervention among heavy-drinking college men. Violence Against Women, 24(10), 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218781931

57.

Persson

Dhingra

Grogan

(2018). Attributions of victim blame in stranger and acquaintance rape: A quantitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(13-14), 2640–2649. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14351

58.

Planty

(2002). Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993-99 (NCJ 189100). http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/tpivc99.pdf

59.

Pugh

Ningard

Ven

T. V.

Butler

(2016). Victim ambiguity: Bystander intervention and sexual assault in the college drinking scene. Deviant Behavior, 37(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1026777

60.

Reid

Dundes

(2017). Bystander programs: Accommodating or derailing sexism? Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7040065

61.

Reynolds-Tylus

Lukacena

K. M.

Quick

B. L.

(2019 August, September). An application of the theory of normative social behavior to bystander intervention for sexual assault. Journal of American College Health, 67(6), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1499648

62.

Rollè

Giardina

Caldarera

A. M.

Gerino

Brustia

(2018). When intimate partner violence meets same sex couples: A review of same sex intimate partner violence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01506

63.

Rosenstein

J. E.

Carroll

M. H.

(2015). Male rape myths, female rape myths, and intent to intervene as a bystander. Violence and Gender, 2(4), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2015.0027

64.

Rothman

Georgia Salivar

Roddy

M. K.

Hatch

S. G.

Doss

B. D.

(2021). Sexual assault among women in college: Immediate and long-term associations with mental health, psychosocial functioning, and romantic relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19-20), 9600–9622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519870158

65.

Salazar

Vivolo-Kantor

Schipani-McLaughlin

(2019). Theoretical mediators of RealConsent: A web-based sexual violence prevention and bystander education program. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118779126

66.

Salton

Wong

Yang

C. S.

(1975). A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/361219.361220

67.

Schachtman

Gallegos

Kaiser

C. R.

(2023). Gender prototypes hinder bystander intervention in women’s sexual harassment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231203290

68.

Schvaneveldt

R. W.

(1990). Proximities, networks, and schemata. In Schvaneveldt

R. W.

(Ed.), Ablex series in computational sciences. Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 135–148). Ablex Publishing.

69.

Schwark

Bohner

(2019). Sexual violence—“victim” or “survivor”: News images affect explicit and implicit judgments of blame. Violence Against Women, 25(12), 1491–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218820202

70.

Seelau

S. M.

Seelau

E. P.

(2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20(6), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-7798-4

71.

Seelau

E. P.

Seelau

S. M.

Poorman

P. B.

(2003). Gender and role-based perceptions of domestic abuse: Does sexual orientation matter? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.524

72.

Simonson

Subich

L. M.

(1999). Rape perceptions as a function of gender-role traditionality and victim-perpetrator association. Sex Roles, 40(7-8), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018844231555

73.

Smith

S. G.

Zhang

Basile

K. C.

Merrick

M. T.

Wang

Kresnow

Chen

(2018). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief—Updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

74.

Sparck Jones

(1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 28(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026526

75.

Stemple

Meyer

I. H.

(2014). The sexual victimization of men in America: New data challenge old assumptions. American Journal of Public health, 104(6), e19–e26. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301946

76.

Stewart

A. L.

(2014). The men’s project: A sexual assault prevention program targeting college men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(4), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033947

77.

Taylor

Banyard

Grych

Hamby

(2019). Not all behind closed doors: Examining bystander involvement in intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(18), 3915–3935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516673629

78.

Taylor

M. E.

Weaver

N. L.

Weaver

T. L.

Loux

T. M.

Kutz

T. J.

(2023). Evaluation of support over silence for KIDS: A bystander training program to address public child maltreatment. Journal of Family Violence, 38(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00376-8

79.

Waasdorp

T. E.

Bradshaw

C. P.

Dowdy

(2018). Examining variation in adolescent bystanders’ responses to bullying. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 18–33. https://doi-org.pvamu.idm.oclc.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0081.V47-1

80.

Walker

Archer

Davies

(2005). Effects of rape on men: A descriptive analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-1001-0

81.

Weaver

N. L.

Taylor

M. E.

Weaver

T. L.

Kutz

T. J.

(2020). Support over silence for KIDS: A bystander training program to address public child maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 118(3), 105257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105257

82.

Zelin

A. I.

Walker

R. V.

Johnson

D. M.

(2019). Cornered at a bar: How victim clothing, alcohol intake, and relationship with bystander impact intention to help. Violence Against Women, 25(10), 1163–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218809948