Using original surveys to investigate how online gender-based harassment marginalizes or empowers female college students, we found increased exposure to misogyny polarizes digital participation. Women aware of gender inequality in Korea encountering online hate speech were more inclined to engage in online movements, unlike women who did not recognize such inequality. This highlights distinct opportunities in relation to digital activism, showing online hate speech can sometimes be a catalyst for online political participation. This study expands current research on digital protest, highlighting the political ramifications of empowering women in the critical context of their unequal democratic rights outside the West.
BarkerK.JuraszO. (2019). Online misogyny: A challenge for digital feminism?Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 95–114. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26760834
BellE.MeriläinenS.TaylorS.TienariJ. (2019). Time’s up! Feminist theory and activism meets organization studies. Human Relations, 72(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790067
4.
ChoJ. S.ChoY. (2019). A study on online hate speech and offline hate speech relationship. Korean Association of Criminal Psychology, 15(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.25277/KCPR.2019.15.2.23
5.
EjrnæsA. (2017). Deprivation and non-institutional political participation: Analysing the relationship between deprivation, institutional trust and political activism in Europe. European Politics and Society, 18(4), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1256029
6.
GoverA. R.HarperS. B.LangtonL. (2020). Anti-Asian hate crime during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring the reproduction of inequality. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09545-1
7.
HegerK.HoffmannC. P. (2021). Feminism! What is it good for? The role of feminism and political self-efficacy in women’s online political participation. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865909
8.
HegerK.HoffmannC. P. (2023). Feminist women’s online political participation: Empowerment through feminist political attitudes or feminist identity?Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2119320
9.
HenryN.PowellA. (2015). Embodied harms: Gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 21(6), 758–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576581
JeongE.LeeJ. (2018). We take the red pill, we confront the DickTrix: Online feminist activism and the augmentation of gendered realities in South Korea. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447354
12.
JoJ. (2012). Unpacking women-friendly political engagement in everyday life style politics. Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 168–200. https://doi.org/10.17787/jsgiss.2012.20.2.168
13.
KimJ. (2017). #Iamafeminist as the “mother tag”: Feminist identification and activism against misogyny on Twitter in South Korea. Feminist Media Studies, 17(5), 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1283343
14.
KimJ.-Y. (2005). ‘Bowling together’ isn’t a cure-all: The relationship between social capital and political trust in South Korea. International Political Science Review, 26(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105050381
15.
KimK.-H.ChoY.-H.BaeJ.-A. (2020). Exploratory study on countering internet hate speech: Focusing on case study of exposure to internet hate speech and experts’ in-depth interview. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(2), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.02.499
KimY. (2021). Mirroring misogyny in hell chosun: Megalia, WOMAD, and Korea’s feminism in the age of digital populism. European Journal of Korean Studies, 20(2), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.33526/EJKS.20212002.101
18.
KooJ. H. (2020). South Korean cyberfeminism and trolling: The limitation of online feminist community WOMAD as counterpublic. Feminist Media Studies, 20(6), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1622585
McLeanJ. (2020). Changing digital geographies: Technologies, environments and people. Palgrave MacMillan.
21.
MendesK.RingroseJ.KellerJ. (2018). #Metoo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818765318
22.
MendesK.RingroseJ.KellerJ. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford Academic.
23.
MinY. (2019). The gender gap in political participation: Exploring the mobilizing effects of digital media. The Journal of Asian Women, 58(2), 39–75. https://doi.org/10.14431/jaw.2019.08.58.2.39
24.
NadimM.FladmoeA. (2019). Silencing women? Gender and online harassment. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865518
25.
NewtonK.StolleD.ZmerliS. (2018). Social and political trust. In UslanerE. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 961–976). Oxford University Press.
RenyT. T.BarretoM. A. (2022). Xenophobia in the time of pandemic: Othering, anti-Asian attitudes, and COVID-19. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2020.1769693
29.
SobierajS. (2020). Credible threat. Attacks against women online and the future of democracy. Oxford University Press.
30.
TesslerH.ChoiM.KaoG. (2020). The anxiety of being Asian American: Hate crimes and negative biases during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09541-5
