Despite one in three women experiencing abuse by an intimate partner in their lifetime, intimate partner violence (IPV) is under-reported. Globally, IPV routine enquiry is used as part of healthcare response to addressing IPV. This paper presents the views of pregnant women (n = 40) and providers (n = 30) of IPV routine enquiry as part of antenatal care policy in Ireland. Respondents supported IPV routine enquiry as part of usual antenatal care, and while immediate disclosure was recognized as important, it was not a primary expectation. Routine enquiry was seen as a woman’s right and a providers’ duty to provide holistic, empowered, women centered and safe care and where provision of information and education on IPV is as fundamental as the disclosure of abuse.
Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ARROWS) (2020). Identifying and responding to domestic violence in antenatal care. Research to Policy and Practice.
6.
BairdK.SaitoA.EustaceJ.CreedyD. K. (2018). Longitudinal evaluation of a training program to promote routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence by midwives. Women and Birth, 31(5), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.004
7.
BaxterP.JackS. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
8.
Bradbury-JonesC.ClarkeM.TaylorJ. (2017). Abused women’s experiences of a primary care identification and referral intervention: A case study analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(12), 3189–3199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13250
9.
Bradbury-JonesC.TaylorJ.KrollT.DuncanF. (2014). Domestic abuse awareness and recognition among primary healthcare professionals and abused women: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(21-22), 3057–3068. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12534
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. 1981.
BurnettC.CrowderJ.BacchusL. J.SchminkeyD.BullockL.SharpsP.CampbellJ. (2021). “It doesn’t freak US out the way it used to”: An evaluation of the domestic violence enhanced home visitation program to inform practice and policy screening for IPV. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), np7488–np7515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519827161
13.
ChangJ. C.DadoD.SchusslerS.HawkerL.HollandC. L.BurkeJ. G.ClussP. A. (2012). In person versus computer screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 88(3), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.021
14.
ChavesK.EastwoodJ.OgboF. A.HendryA.JalaludinB.KhanlariS.PageP. (2019). Intimate partner violence identified through routine antenatal screening and maternal and perinatal health outcomes. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19, 357. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2527-9
15.
ClarkeC. J.RennerL. M.LogeaisM. E. (2017). Intimate partner violence screening and referral practices in an outpatient care setting. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517724253
16.
DempseyL.DowlingM.LarkinP.MurphyK. (2016). Sensitive interviewing in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 39, 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21743
17.
DichterM. E.SorrentinoA. E.HaywoodT. N.BellamyS. L.MedvedevaE.RobertsC. B.IversonK. M. (2018). Women's healthcare utilization following routine screening for past-year intimate partner violence in the veterans health administration. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(6), 936–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4321-1
18.
EustaceJ.BairdK.SaitoA. S.CreedyD. K. (2016). Midwives’ experiences of routine enquiry for intimate partner violence in pregnancy. Women and Birth, 29(6), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.004
19.
FederG.RamsayJ.DunneD.RoseM.ArseneC.NormanR. (2009). How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technology Assessment, 13:iii-iv, xi-xiii(1-113), 137–347. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56882/
20.
García-MorenoC.HegartyK.Lucas d’OliveiraA. F.Koziol-McLainJ.ColombiniM.FederG. (2015). The health-systems response to violence against women: Violence against women and girls 2. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61837-7
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
23.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In LincolnN. K. D. Y. S. (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
24.
GuptaJ.FalbK. L.PontaO.XuanZ.CamposP. A.GomezA. A.ValadesJ.CariñoJ.OlavarrietaC. D. (2017). A nurse-delivered, clinic-based intervention to address intimate partner violence among low-income women in Mexico City: Findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 15(128), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0880-y
HenriksenL.Garnweidner-HolmeL. M.ThorsteinsenK. K.LukasseM. (2017). It is a difficult topic’—A qualitative study of midwiveś experiences with routine antenatal enquiry for intimate partner violence. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1352-2
27.
HeronR. L.EismaM. C. (2021). Barriers and facilitators of disclosing domestic violence to the healthcare service: A systematic review of qualitative research. Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(3), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13282
28.
HookerL.SamaraweeraN. Y.AgiusP. A.TaftA. (2016). Intimate partner violence and the experience of early motherhood: A cross-sectional analysis of factors associated with a poor experience of motherhood. Midwifery, 34(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.12.011
29.
HookerL.WardB.VerrinderG. (2012). Domestic violence screening in maternal and child health nursing practice: A scoping review. Contemporary Nurse, 42(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2012.42.2.198
JamesL.BrodyD.HamiltonZ. (2013). Risk factors for domestic violence during pregnancy: A meta-analytic review. Violence and Victims, 28(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00034
33.
JamesL.MillerE. (2015). Beyond screening: A patient-centered approach to intimate partner violence. Futures Without Violence online webinar 4th April 2015. Blue Shield of California Blue. https://s3.amazonaws.com/fwvcorp/wp-content/uploads/20160406142635/BeyondScreening April42016.pdf.
34.
KingN.BrooksJ. (2017). Template analysis for business and management students. Sage.
35.
KirwanC. (2019). Influencing factors in the implementation and management of routine enquiry for intimate partner violence (IPV) in antenatal care setting in Ireland: A case study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Galway.
36.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
37.
LoGiudiceJ. A. (2015). Prenatal screening for intimate partner violence: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Applied Nursing Research, 28(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.04.004
38.
McQuiggR. J. A. (2016). Domestic violence as a human rights issue: Rumor v. Italy. European Journal of International Law, 26(4), 1009–1025. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv057
39.
MillerC. J.AdjognonO. L.BradyJ. E.DichterM. E.IversonK. M. (2021). Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review. Implementation Research and Practice, 2, 26334895211039894. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895211039894
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (2012). Statistics. Retrieved February 10, 2020, fromhttps://ncadv.org/statistics
44.
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. (2014). Domestic violence and abuse: How health services, social care and the organisations they work with can respond effectively (PH50) (Public Health Guidance NICE guideline, Issue. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph50
45.
NeumanW. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
46.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
O'ConnorT. (2018). Implementing a universal education approach to intimate partner violence in a patient centered medical home. DNP Final Report. https://doi.org/10.6083/DNUZQG
49.
O’DohertyL.HegartyK.RamsayJ.DavidsonL. L.FederG.TaftA. (2015). Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(7), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub3
50.
OnM.AyreJ.WebsterK.MoonL. (2016). Examination of the health outcomes of intimate partner violence against women: State of knowledge paper (ANROWS Landscapes series, 03/2016). Sidney, NSW: ANROWS.
51.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). Society at a glance 2019: OECD social indicators. OEDC Publishinghttps://doi.org/10.1787/soc_glance-2019-en
52.
PalinkasL. A.HorwitzS. M.GreenC. A.WisdomJ. P.DuanN.HoagwoodK. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
53.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Williams & Wilkins.
54.
PortnoyG. A.ColonR.GrossG. M.AdamsL. J.BastianL. A.IversonK. M. (2020). Patient and provider barriers, facilitators, and implementation preferences of intimate partner violence perpetration screening. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 746. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05595-7
55.
PotterL. C.MorrisR.HegartyK.Garcı´a-MorenoC.FederG. (2021). Categories and health impacts of intimate partner violence in the world health organization multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. International Journal of Epidemiology, 50(2), 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa220
Román-GálvezR. M.Martín-PeláezS. M.-G.Martínez-GalianoJ. M.KhanK. S.Bueno-CavanillasA. (2021). Prevalence of intimate partner violence in pregnancy: An Umbrella review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020707
59.
Saletti-CuestaL.AizenbergL.Ricci-CabelloI. (2018). Opinions and experiences of primary healthcare providers regarding violence against women: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Journal of Family Violence, 33(6), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9971-6
60.
SalmonD.BairdK. M.WhiteP. (2015). Women's views and experiences of antenatal enquiry for domestic abuse during pregnancy. Health Expectations, 18(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12060
61.
SillerH.König-BachmannM.PerkhoferS.HochleitnerM. (2020). Midwives perceiving and dealing with violence against women: Is it mostly about midwives actively protecting women? A modified grounded theory study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3-4), 1902–1932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520927497
62.
SmithS. G.ZhangX.BasileK. C.MerrickM. T.WangJ.KresnowM.ChenJ. (2018). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief—Updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
63.
SpangaroJ.Koziol-McLainK.ZwiA.RutherfordA.FrailM. A.RuaneJ. (2016). Deciding to tell: Qualitative configurational analysis of decisions to disclose experience of intimate partner violence in antenatal care. Social Science & Medicine, 154(April), 45–53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953616300879?via%3Dihub
64.
TaftA.HookerL.HumphreysC.HegartyK.WalterR.AdamsC.AgiusP.SmallR. (2015). Maternal and child health nurse screening and care for mothers experiencing domestic violence (MOVE): A cluster randomised trial. BMC Medicine, 13(150). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0375-7
65.
TaftA.O'DohertyL.HegartyK.RamsayJ.DavidsonL.FederG. (2013). Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD007007. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub2
66.
TaillieuT. L.BrownridgeD. A.TylerK. A.ChanK. L.TiwariA.SantosS. C. (2016). Pregnancy and intimate partner violence in Canada: A comparison of victims who were and were not abused during pregnancy. Journal of Family Violence, 31(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9789-4
67.
TarziaL.BohrenM. A.CameronJ., et al. (2020). Women’s experiences and expectations after disclosure of intimate partner abuse to a healthcare provider: A qualitative meta-synthesis. BMJ Open, 10(11), e041339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041339
68.
TodahlJ.NekkantiA.SchnablerS. (2020). Universal screening and education: A client-centered protocol for normalizing intimate partner violence conversation in clinical practice. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 19(4), 322–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2020.1835595
69.
United Nations (2015). The World’s women trends and statistics.
70.
WalterB.IndreboeH.LukasseM.HenriksenL.Garnweidner-HolmeL. (2021). Pregnant women's attitudes toward and experiences with a tablet intervention to promote safety behaviors in a randomized controlled trial: Qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(7), e28680. https://doi.org/10.2196/28680
