This large mixed methods study adopted a citizenship lens to examine the impact of intimate partner violence (IPV) on women's social participation. The study found that social participation in all categories contracted dramatically during IPV and, in most cases, never regained pre-violence levels. The study also found that following initial social withdrawal, many women went on to reengage in new ways, including through political activism on gendered violence, revealing how failures on the part of the state and community to adequately respond to IPV can lead to new forms of participatory citizenship.
ABS. (2016). Cultural diversity in Australia—Reflecting Australia: Stories from the census.Cat. No. 2071.0. Commonwealth of Australia.
3.
BakerC. K.NiolonP. H.OliphantH. (2009). A descriptive analysis of transitional housing programs for survivors of intimate partner violence in the United States. Violence Against Women, 15(4), 460–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208330933
CloughA.DraughonJ. E.Njie-CarrV.RollinsC.GlassN. (2014). ‘Having housing made everything else possible’: Affordable, safe and stable housing for women survivors of violence. Qualitative Social Work, 13(5), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013503003
6.
ConnellR. (1995). Masculinities. Allen and Unwin.
7.
CrenshawK. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
FranzwayS.MouldingN. T.WendtS.ZuffereyC.ChungD. (2019). The sexual politics of gendered violence and women’s citizenship. Policy Press.
11.
Garcia-Del MoralP.DersnahM. A. (2014). A feminist challenge to the gendered politics of the public/private divide: On due diligence, domestic violence, and citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 18(6-7), 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2014.944772
12.
HughesM. M.BrushL. D. (2015). The price of protection: A trajectory analysis of civil remedies for abuse and women’s earnings. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414561117
13.
KellyL. (2003). The wrong debate: Reflections on why force is not the key issue with respect to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation. Feminist Review, 73, 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400086
14.
KellyL.SharpN.KleinR. (2014). Finding the costs of freedom. How women and children rebuild their lives after domestic violence. Solace Women’s Aid and Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.
15.
LanierC.MaumeM. O. (2009). Intimate partner violence and social isolation across the rural/urban divide. Violence Against Women, 15(11), 1311–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209346711
16.
LaranceL. Y.PorterM. L. (2004). Observations from practice support group membership as a process of social capital formation among female survivors of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(6), 676–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504263875
17.
LaursenB.HartupW. W. (2002). The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 95, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.35
18.
LevasseurM.RichardL.GauvinL., et al. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science &Medicine, 71(12), 2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041
19.
LumbyB.FarrellyT. (2009). Family violence, help seeking and the close knit Aboriginal community: Lessons for mainstream service provision. Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, 19, 1–24.
20.
LundgrenE. (1998). The hand that strikes and comforts: Gender construction and the tension between body and symbol. In R. Emerson Dobash & R. P. Dobash, (Eds.) Rethinking violence against women. SAGE Publications.
21.
MarshallT. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge University Press.
22.
McNayL. (2004). Situated intersubjectivity. In MarshallB.WitzA. (Eds.), Engendering the social: Feminist encounters with sociological theory (pp. 171–186). Open University Press.
23.
MillettK. (1969). Sexual politics. Avon Books.
24.
MouldingN. T.BuchananF.WendtS. (2015). Untangling self-blame and mother-blame in women’s and children’s perspectives on maternal protectiveness in domestic violence: Implications for practice. Child Abuse Review, 4(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2389
25.
MouldingN. T.FranzwayS.WendtS.ZuffereyC.ChungD. (2021). Re-thinking women’s mental health after intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 27(8), 1064–1090. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780122092193
26.
MurrayC.CroweA.AkersW. (2016). How can we end the stigma surrounding domestic and sexual violence? A modified Delphi study with national advocacy leaders. Journal of Family Violence, 31(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9768-9
27.
NobleJ.VerityF. (2006). Imagine if. A handbook for activists. Wakefield Press.
NussbaumM. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Belknap of Harvard University Press.
31.
Okin S. M. (1991). Gender, the public and the private. In: D. Held (ed.), Political theory today. Stanford University Press.
32.
PlummerK. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to a critical humanism. Sage Publications.
33.
ProbynE. (2005). Blush: faces of shame. University of Minnesota Press.
34.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
35.
Scheffer LindgrenM.RenckB. (2008). It is still so deep-seated, the fear’: psychological stress reactions as consequences of intimate partner violence. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 15(3), 219–228.
36.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
