Technology-Facilitated Abuse in the Context of Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study of Women Survivors in Taiwan

Abstract

We explore the emerging issue of how communications technologies can be used by male perpetrators to facilitate intimate partner violence against their female partners. We analyzed interview narratives from 18 women survivors of intimate partner violence in Taiwan, informed by Stark's theory of coercive control. Our findings indicated that the male perpetrators of intimate partner violence against the survivors utilized communications technologies to further harm, control, and intimidate their victims. We found that the perpetrators harassed, stalked/monitored, and isolated the survivors and distributed defamatory messages about the survivors to other people using telephones, e-mail, social media, the Internet, broadcast media, and recording devices.

Keywords

technology-facilitated abuse intimate partner violence women survivors Taiwan stalking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

T. S.

Abbas

Ather

(2014). Associations of controlling behavior, physical and sexual violence with health symptoms. J Women’s Health Care, 3(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000202

Barnett

O. W.

(2000). Why battered women do not leave, part 1: External inhibiting factors within society. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1(4), 343–372. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26636286

Belknap

Chu

Deprince

(2012). The roles of phones and computers in threatening and abusing women victims of male intimate partner abuse. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 19(2), 373–406. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djglp/vol19/iss2/4

Boethius

Åkerström

Hydén

(2022). The double-edged sword—Abused women’s experiences of digital technology. European Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2040437. Published online first.

Brown

Hegarty

(2018). Digital dating abuse measures: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 44–59. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1359178917300368?token=AD8B01E81F32C3BE07C547C0142EBF3862452002C8D786B1BE30F365B80DE9071E9D61F1FE4A3992006A8CFC28299909&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20230310073040 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.003

Bryant

Bricknell

(2017). Homicide in Australia 2012–13 and 2013–14: National Homicide Monitoring Program report. Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/sr002.pdf

Chan

K. L.

Tiwari

Fong

D. Y. T.

Leung

W. C.

Brownridge

D. A.

P. C.

(2009). Correlates of in-law conflict and intimate partner violence against Chinese pregnant women in Hong Kong. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508315780

Cuomo

Dolci

(2021). New tools, old abuse: Technology-enabled coercive control (TECC). Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 126, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.08.002

Dimond

Fiesler

Bruckman

(2011). Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers, 23, 413–421. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0953543811000397

10.

Dokkedahl

Kok

R. N.

Murphy

Kristensen

T. R.

Bech-Hansen

Elklit

(2019). The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 198. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-019-1118-1

11.

Dragiewicz

Burgess

Matamoros Fernandez

Salter

Suzor

Woodlock

Harris

(2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: Domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609–625. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341?needAccess=true&role=button

12.

Dragiewicz

Harris

Woodlock

Salter

(2021). Digital media and domestic violence in Australia: Essential contexts. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 21(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16153782923978

13.

Fereday

Muir-Cochrane

(2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/160940690600500107

14.

Fiolet

Brown

Wellington

Bentley

Hegarty

(2021). Exploring the impact of technology-facilitated abuse and its relationship with domestic violence: A qualitative study on experts’ perceptions. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8, 1–8. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/23333936211028176

15.

Flynn

Powell

Hindes

(2021). Technology-facilitated abuse: A survey of support services stakeholders (Research report, 02/2021). ANROWS. https://20ian81kynqg38bl3l3eh8bf-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/4AP.4-Flynn_et_al-TFa_Stakeholder_Survey.pdf

16.

George

Harris

(2014). Landscapes of violence: Women surviving family violence in rural and regional Victoria. Deakin University.

17.

Global Gender (2022). Exhibition on gender-based violence prevention . http://www.globalgender.org/en-global/status_page/index/5

18.

Hand

Chung

Peters

(2009, January). The use of information and communication technologies to coerce and control in domestic violence and following separation (Stakeholder Paper 6). Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, Newsletter (pp. 1–16).

19.

Harris

Woodlock

(2021). Digital coercive control and spatiality: Rural, regional, and remote women’s experience. In Bailey

Flynn

Henry

(Eds.), The Emerald International handbook of technology-facilitated violence and abuse (Emerald studies in digital crime, technology and social harms) (pp. 387–406). Emerald Publishing Limited.

20.

Harris

B. A.

Woodlock

(2019). Digital coercive control: Insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 530–550. http://doi.org./10.1093/bjc/azy052

21.

Henry

Flynn

Powell

(2020). Technology-facilitated domestic and sexual violence: A review. Violence Against Women, 26, 1828–1854. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077801219875821

22.

Iida

(2022). How do traditional gender roles influence women’s lives in Taiwan? An investigation of highly educated women’s willingness to create families. East Asia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-022-09392-3

23.

Kelly

J. B.

Johnson

M. P.

(2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x

24.

Lindgren

M. S.

Renck

(2008). Intimate partner violence and the leaving process: Interviews with abused women. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 3(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620801945805

25.

Mechanic

M. B.

Weaver

T. L.

Resick

P. A.

(2000). Intimate partner violence and stalking behavior: Exploration of patterns and correlates in a sample of acutely battered women. Violence and Victims, 15(1), 55–72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2977930/pdf/nihms247622.pdf

26.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

27.

Mistry Health and Welfare. (2022). Types of domestic violence victimization by gender . https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/cp-1303-59327-105.html

28.

Pan

Lin

Liu

Lin

(2021). A report on intimate partner violence among women in Taiwan: Statistical results. Ministry of Health and Welfare. https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/cp-1147-64194-105.html

29.

Picard

(2007). Tech abuse in teen relationship study. Liz Claiborne.

30.

Pichon

Treves-Kagan

Stern

Kyegombe

Stöckl

Buller

A. M.

(2020). A mixed-methods systematic review: Infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5682–5717. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682

31.

Raj

Livramento

K. N.

Santana

M. C.

Gupta

Silverman

J. G.

(2006). Victims of intimate partner violence more likely to report abuse from in-laws. Violence Against Women, 12(10), 936–949. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206292935

32.

Reed

L. A.

Tolman

R. M.

Ward

L. M.

(2016). Snooping and sexting: Digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women, 22, 1556–1576. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216630143

33.

Ringrose

Gill

Livingstone

Harvey

(2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’: A report prepared for the NSPCC. National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/44216/1/__Libfile_repository_Content_Livingstone%2C%20S_A%20qualitative%20study%20of%20children%2C%20young%20people%20and%20%27sexting%27%20%28LSE%20RO%29.pdf

34.

Scott

A. J.

Lloyd

Gavin

(2010). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in the United Kingdom and Australia. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1185–1194. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0093854810378812

35.

Showalter

McCloskey

R. J.

(2020). A qualitative study of intimate partner violence and employment instability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), 12730–12755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520903140

36.

Southworth

Dawson

Fraser

Tucker

(2005). A high-tech twist on abuse: Technology, intimate partner stalking, and advocacy. Violence Against Women Online Resources. https://www.acesdv.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/NNEDV_HighTechTwist_PaperAndApxA_English08.pdf

37.

Stark

(2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.

38.

Stark

(2012). Re-presenting battered women: Coercive control and the defense of liberty . https://www.stopvaw.org/uploads/evan_stark_article_final_100812.pdf

39.

Sugiura

Nurse

(2022). How tech is driving new forms of domestic abuse. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-tech-is-driving-new-forms-of-domestic-abuse-176187

40.

Tjaden

P. G.

Thoennes

(1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Research in brief. NCJ Number: 169592. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles/169592.pdf

41.

Vocus. (2020). Inside stories of Deng Huei-Ru. The Storm Media. https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/3169668?page=1

42.

Wang

Chen

(2003). Taiwan area marital violence [unpublished report]. Ministry of the Interior.

43.

Weitzman

(2001). Not to people like us: Hidden abuse in upscale marriages. Basic Books.

44.

Woodlock

(2013). Technology-facilitated stalking: Findings and recommendations from the SmartSafe project. Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria. http://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4106.9764

45.

Woodlock

(2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216646

46.

Woodlock

Salter

Dragiewicz

Harris

(2022). Living in the darkness: Technology-facilitated coercive control, disenfranchised grief, and institutional betrayal. Violence Against Women, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221114920

47.

World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimate, 2018 . https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256

48.

T. F.

Yeh

K. H.

Cross

S. E.

Larson

L. M.

Wang

Y. C.

Tsai

Y. L.

(2010). Conflict with mothers-in-law and Taiwanese women’s marital satisfaction: The moderating role of husband support. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(4), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009353

49.

Yardley

(2021). Technology-facilitated domestic abuse in political economy: A new theoretical framework. Violence Against Women, 27(10), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220947172

50.

Yoshihama

(2005). A web in the patriarchal clan system: Tactics of intimate partners in the Japanese sociocultural context. Violence Against Women, 11(10), 1236–1262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205280179