The terminology used to describe sexually violent offenses vary, and how these labels are interpreted by the public remains unclear. This study explores the terms for the primary—legally most severe—offense of sexual violence in legal statutes across the United States and investigates how different terms evoke different perceptions about crime severity. Results indicate that nine different terms are used to identify the primary offense of sexual violence in state statutes, with significant differences in perceived severity for these terms. The findings have implications for the public's (mis)understanding of sexual violence and the treatment of survivors and perpetrators.
AddingtonL. A.RennisonC. M. (2008). Rape co-occurrence: Do additional crimes affect victim reporting and police clearance of rape?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-008-9043-9
2.
ArmstrongE.Gleckman-KrutM.JohnsonL. (2018). Silence, power, and inequality: An intersectional approach to sexual violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041410
3.
AshworthA. (1981). The elasticity of mens rea. In TapperC. F. H. (Ed.), Crime, proof and punishment: Essays in memory of Sir Rupert Cross. Butterworth.
4.
BasileK. C.SmithS. G.KresnowM.KhatiwadaS.LeemisR. W. (2022). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Sexual Violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
5.
BienenL. (1980). Rape III – national development in rape reform legislation. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 6(3), 170–213.
6.
BondurantB. (2001). University women’s acknowledgement of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801201007003004
7.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Fawcett Columbine.
BurtM. R. (1998). Rape myths. In OdemM. E.Clay-WarnerJ. (Eds.), Confronting rape and sexual assault (pp. 129–144). Scholarly Resources.
10.
CarsonK. W.BabadS.BrownE. J.BrumbaughC. C.CastilloB. K.NikulinaV. (2020). Why women are not talking about it: Reasons for nondisclosure of sexual victimization and associated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. Violence Against Women, 26(3-4), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219832913
ChenJ.WaltersM. L.GilbertL. K.PatelN. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000252
13.
ClearE. R.CokerA. L.BushH. M.BrancatoC. J.DavidovD. (2020). Lessons learned in creating a college consortium. Journal of Family Violence, 35(6), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8
14.
CleereC.LynnS. J. (2013). Acknowledged versus unacknowledged sexual assault among college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(12), 2593–2611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513479033
15.
DondeS. D.RagsdaleS. K. A.KossM. P.ZuckerA. N. (2018). If it wasn’t rape, was it sexual assault? Comparing rape and sexual assault acknowledgment in college women who have experienced rape. Violence Against Women, 24(14), 1718–1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217743339
16.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2003). Acknowledging sexual violence as rape: Results from a national-level study. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 535–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820300095611
17.
HarnedM. S. (2004). Does it matter what you call it? The relationship between labeling unwanted sexual experiences and distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 1090–1099. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1090
18.
HarrisA. J.SociaK. M. (2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse, 28(7), 660–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214564391
19.
HarrisonJ. L.O’TooleS. K.AmmenS.AhlmeyerS.HarrellS. N.HernandezJ. L. (2020). Sexual offender treatment effectiveness within cognitive-behavioral programs: A meta-analytic investigation of general, sexual, and violent recidivism. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1485526
20.
HirschL. (2022). The role of coping self-efficacy, coping strategies, and resiliency following sexual assault.
21.
JenningsJ. L.DemingA. (2013). Effectively utilizing the “behavioral” in cognitive-behavioral group therapy of sex offenders. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100968
22.
KahnA. S.JacksonJ.KullyC.BadgerK.HalvorsenJ. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00103
23.
KhanS. R.HirschJ. S.WamboldtA.MellinsC. A. (2018). I didn’t want to be ‘that girl’”: The social risks of labeling, telling, and reporting sexual assault. Sociological Science, 5(19), 432–460. https://doi.org/10.15195/v5.a19
KilimnikC. D.BoydR. L.StantonA. M.MestonC. M. (2018). Identification of nonconsensual sexual experiences and sexual self-schemas of women: Implications for sexual functioning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(6), 1633–1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1229-0
26.
KilimnikC. D.MestonC. M. (2019). Sexual violence identification and women’s sexual well-being. Current Sexual Health Reports, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00186-y
27.
LaymanM. J.GidyczC. A.LynnS. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.1.124
28.
LeMaireK. K.OswaldD. L.RussellB. L. (2016). Labeling sexual violence experiences: The role of sexism, rape myth acceptance, and tolerance for sexual harassment. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00148
29.
LittletonH.HendersonC. E. (2009). If she is not a victim, does that mean she was not traumatized? Evaluation of predictors of PTSD symptomology among college rape victims. Violence Against Women, 15(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329386
30.
LittletonH. L.RhatiganD. L.AxsomD. (2007). Unacknowledged rape: How much do we know about the hidden rape victim?Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 14(4), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v14n04_04
31.
LorenzK.JacobsenC. (2021). Sexual violence survivors’ experiences with the police and willingness to report future victimization. Women & Criminal Justice, 34(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1985045
MacyR. J. (2007). A coping theory framework toward preventing sexual revictimization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.09.002
34.
MuehlenhardC. L.KimesL. A. (1999). The social construction of violence: The case of sexual and domestic violence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_6
35.
MuehlenhardC. L.PowchI. G.PhelpsJ. L.GiustiL. M. (1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01155.x
36.
Murphy-OikonenJ.McQueenK.MillerA.ChambersL.HiebertA. (2022). Unfounded sexual assault: Women’s experiences of not being believed by the police. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(11-12), NP8916–NP8940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520978190
37.
OrchowskiL. M.UntiedA. S.GidyczC. A. (2013). Factors associated with college women’s labeling of sexual victimization. Violence and Victims, 28(6), 940–958. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00049
38.
PaternosterR.IovanniL. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6(3), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828900090261
39.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
40.
PetersonZ. D.MuehlenhardC. L. (2011). A match-and-motivation model of how women label their nonconsensual sexual experiences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(4), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311410210
41.
SacksM.AckermanA. R.ShlosbergA. (2018). Rape myths in the media: A content analysis of local newspaper reporting in the United States. Deviant Behavior, 39(9), 1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1410608
42.
SassonS.PaulL. A. (2014). Labeling acts of sexual violence: What roles do assault characteristics, attitudes, and life experiences play?Behavior and Social Issues, 23(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v23i0.5215
43.
ScuttJ. (1978). Reform and the law of rape: Common law and continental directions. The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 11(1), 1–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23905594
44.
SearlesP.BergerR. J. (1987). The current status of rape reform legislation: An examination of state statutes. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 10(1), 25–43.
45.
SpencerD.DodgeA.RicciardelliR.BallucciD. (2018). I think it’s re-victimizing victims almost every time”: Police perceptions of criminal justice responses to sexual violence. Critical Criminology, 26(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9390-2
46.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 18(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012124400
47.
TadrosV. (2005). The distinctiveness of domestic abuse: A freedom-based account. In DuffR. A.GreenS. P. (Eds.), Defining crimes (pp. 119–142). Oxford University Press.
48.
TaylorS. E.WoodJ. V.LichtmanR. R. (1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00139.x
49.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. NIJ Research Report, NCJ 210346.Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
50.
TracyC. E.FromsonT. L.LongJ. G.WhitmanC. (2012). Rape and sexual assault in the legal system. Presented to the National Research Council of the National Academies Panel on Measuring Rape and Sexual Assault in the Bureau of Justice Statistics Household Surveys Committee on National Statistics.
51.
TylerT. (2012). Legitimacy and compliance: The virtues of self-regulation. In Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice (pp. 17–37). Routledge.
52.
WaplesM. (2020). Rape and the law: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Cognella.
53.
WeissK. G. (2011). Neutralizing sexual victimization: A typology of victims’ non-reporting accounts. Theoretical criminology, 15(4), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480610391527
54.
WilkinsonC. (2008). Unwanted sex versus rape: How the language used to describe sexual assault impacts perceptions of perpetrator guilt, victim blame and reporting. Proquest Dissertations Publishing.
WillisG. M. (2018). Why call someone by what we don’t want them to be? The ethics of labeling in forensic/correctional psychology. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(7), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421640
57.
WilsonL. C.MillerK. E. (2016). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of unacknowledged rape. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015576391
58.
WilsonL. C.TruexH. R.Murphy-NeilsonM. C.KunaniecK. P.PamlanyeJ. T.ReedR. A. (2021). How female disclosure recipients react to women survivors: The impact of rape acknowledgment and rejection of rape myths. Sex Roles, 84(5), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01169-3
59.
YappE. J.QuayleE. (2018). A systematic review of the association between rape myth acceptance and male-on-female sexual violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.002
60.
YoungS. L.MaguireK. C. (2003). Talking about sexual violence. Women and Language, 26(2), 40–52.
