Reproductive Coercion Among College Students: An Extension and Test of Routine Activity Theory

Abstract

The current study is guided by routine activity theory to explore the risk of experiencing reproductive coercion among a sample of sexually active college students (N = 1,515). Findings indicate that being in an exclusive relationship was associated with lower odds of reproductive coercion, yet prior victimization, including emotional abuse and sexual violence, was associated with higher odds of reproductive coercion. This study supports other research that finds reproductive coercion does not occur in isolation from other victimization experiences, and multifaceted prevention strategies are needed. Implications relating to autonomous reproductive decision-making are discussed.

Keywords

reproductive coercion routine activity theory college sample sexual violence intimate partner violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

K. A.

Sanders

R. A.

Grace

K. T.

Thorpe

R. J.

Doro

Bowleg

(2021). Having a child meant I had a real life”: Reproductive coercion and childbearing motivations among young black men living in Baltimore. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17-18), NP9197–NP9225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519853400

Alexander

K. A.

Volpe

E. M.

Abboud

Campbell

J. C.

(2016). Reproductive coercion, sexual risk behaviours and mental health symptoms among young low-income behaviourally bisexual women: Implications for nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(23-24), 3533–3544. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13238

Armstrong

E. A.

England

Fogarty

A. C.

(2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802

Azimi

A. M.

Daigle

L. E.

(2021). Mental health and victimization: Does risky lifestyle matter? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1-2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517724255

Basile

K. C.

Smith

S. G.

Liu

Kresnow

M. J.

Fasula

A. M.

Gilbert

Chen

(2018). Rape-related pregnancy and association with reproductive coercion in the US. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(6), 770–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.028

Basile

K. C.

Smith

S. G.

Liu

Miller

Kresnow

M. J.

(2021). Prevalence of intimate partner reproductive coercion in the United States: Racial and ethnic differences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21-22), NP12324–NP12341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519888205

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

Chen

Stevens

M. R.

(2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Blayney

J. A.

Jaffe

A. E.

Carroll

Read

J. P.

(2022). Contextual risk for nonconsensual sexual experiences: An application of routine activity theories among first-year college women who drink alcohol. Psychology of Violence, 12(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000401

Bogle

K. A.

(2007). The shift from dating to hooking up in college: What scholars have missed. Sociology Compass, 1(2), 775–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00031.x

10.

Brodsky

(2017). Rape-adjacent”: Imagining legal responses to nonconsensual condom removal. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 32(2), 183–210.

11.

Cass

A. I.

(2007). Routine activities and sexual assault: An analysis of individual-and school-level factors. Violence and Victims, 22(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667007780842810

12.

Chopin

Beauregard

Arseneault

(2022). Requiem for a dream: A lifestyle and routine activities victimological analysis to explore the sexual victimization of illicit drug users. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 31(9), 1241–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2022.2089866

13.

Clark

L. E.

Allen

R. H.

Goyal

Raker

Gottlieb

A. S.

(2014). Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 210(1), 42.e1–42.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.019

14.

Clodfelter

T. A.

Turner

M. G.

Hartman

J. L.

Kuhns

J. B.

(2010). Sexual harassment victimization during emerging adulthood: A test of routine activities theory and a general theory of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 56(3), 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708324665

15.

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

16.

Cohen

L. E.

Kluegel

J. R.

Land

K. C.

(1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review, 46(5), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094935

17.

Daigle

L. E.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

(2008). The violent and sexual victimization of college women: Is repeat victimization a problem? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(9), 1296–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508314293

18.

De Coster

Estes

S. B.

Mueller

C. W.

(1999). Routine activities and sexual harassment in the workplace. Work and Occupations, 26(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888499026001003

19.

D’Ignazio

Klein

L. F.

(2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press.

20.

Finkelhor

Asdigian

N. L.

(1996). Risk factors for youth victimization: Beyond a lifestyles/routine activities theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.11.1.3

21.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2002). Being pursued: Stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Criminology & Public Policy, 1(2), 257–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00091.x

22.

Fisher

B. S.

Daigle

L. E.

Cullen

F. T.

(2009). Unsafe in the ivory tower: The sexual victimization of college women. Sage Publications.

23.

Fisher

B. S.

Daigle

L. E.

Cullen

F. T.

(2010). What distinguishes single from recurrent sexual victims? The role of lifestyle-routine activities and first-incident characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 102–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902763061

24.

Fisher

B. S.

Sloan

J. J.

Cullen

F. T.

(1998). Crime in the ivory tower: The level and sources of student victimization. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36(3), 671–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01262.x

25.

Foster

D. G.

Gould

Taylor

Weitz

T. A.

(2012). Attitudes and decision making among women seeking abortions at one US clinic. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1363/4411712

26.

Franklin

C. A.

Franklin

T. W.

Nobles

M. R.

Kercher

G. A.

(2012). Assessing the effect of routine activity theory and self-control on property, personal, and sexual assault victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1296–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812453673

27.

Franklin

C. A.

Menaker

T. A.

(2018). Feminist routine activity theory and sexual assault victimization: Estimating risk by perpetrator tactic among sorority women. Victims & Offenders, 13(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1250692

28.

Garcia

J. R.

Reiber

Massey

S. G.

Merriwether

A. M.

(2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027911

29.

Grace

K. T.

Anderson

J. C.

(2018). Reproductive coercion: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016663935

30.

Grace

K. T.

Decker

M. R.

Holliday

C. N.

Talis

Miller

(2022b). Reproductive coercion in college health clinic patients: Risk factors, care seeking and perpetration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(4), 1464–1475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15207

31.

Grace

K. T.

Perrin

N. A.

Clough

Miller

Glass

N. E.

(2022a). Correlates of reproductive coercion among college women in abusive relationships: Baseline data from the college safety study. Journal of American College Health, 70(4), 1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1790570

32.

Hayes

B. E.

(2018). Repeat victimization among intimate partner violence victims: The impact of guardianship. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116651714

33.

Hayes

B. E.

(2022). Development and application of individual and national opportunity to the experience of intimate partner violence among married women in the global south. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(3), 327–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278211049940

34.

Hayes

B E

Maher

C A

(2023). A systematic review of lifestyleroutine activity theory in the context of direct-contact sexual victimization. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231153864

35.

Hayes

B. E.

O’Neal

E. N.

Hernandez

C. N.

(2021). The sexual victimization of college students: A test of routine activity theory. Crime & Delinquency, 67(12), 2043–2068. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112872095434

36.

Hollis-Peel

M. E.

Reynald

D. M.

Van Bavel

Elffers

Welsh

B. C.

(2011). Guardianship for crime prevention: A critical review of the literature. Crime, Law and Social Change, 56(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9309-2

37.

Holt

T. J.

Bossler

A. M.

Malinski

May

D. C.

(2016). Identifying predictors of unwanted online sexual conversations among youth using a low self-control and routine activity framework. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(2), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986215621376

38.

Katz

Poleshuck

E. L.

Beach

Olin

(2017). Reproductive coercion by male sexual partners: Associations with partner violence and college women’s sexual health. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3301–3320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515597441

39.

Katz

Sutherland

M. A.

(2020). College women’s experiences of male partner contraceptive interference: Associations with intimate partner violence and contraceptive outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21-22), 4350–4374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715600

40.

Kazmerski

McCauley

H. L.

Jones

Borrero

Silverman

J. G.

Decker

M. R.

Tancredi

Miller

(2015). Use of reproductive and sexual health services among female family planning clinic clients exposed to partner violence and reproductive coercion. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(7), 1490–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1653-2

41.

Krishnakumar

Verma

(2021). Understanding domestic violence in India during COVID-19: A routine activity approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 16(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-020-09340-1

42.

Martin

P. Y.

(2016). The rape prone culture of academic contexts: Fraternities and athletics. Gender & Society, 30(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215612708

43.

McCauley

H. L.

Dick

R. N.

Tancredi

D. J.

Goldstein

Blackburn

Silverman

J. G.

Monasterio

James

Miller

(2014). Differences by sexual minority status in relationship abuse and sexual and reproductive health among adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 652–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.04.020

44.

Mengo

Black

B. M.

(2016). Violence victimization on a college campus: Impact on GPA and school dropout. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115584750

45.

Miller

Decker

M. R.

McCauley

H. L.

Tancredi

D. J.

Levenson

R. R.

Waldman

Schoenwald

Silverman

J. G.

(2010). Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception, 81(4), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004

46.

Miller

Decker

M. R.

Reed

Raj

Hathaway

J. E.

Silverman

J. G.

(2007). Male partner pregnancy-promoting behaviors and adolescent partner violence: Findings from a qualitative study with adolescent females. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 7(5), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ambp.2007.05.007

47.

Miller

McCauley

H. L.

Tancredi

D. J.

Decker

M. R.

Anderson

Silverman

J. G.

(2014). Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients. Contraception, 89(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.011

48.

Miller

Silverman

J. G.

(2010). Reproductive coercion and partner violence: Implications for clinical assessment of unintended pregnancy. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 5(5), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1586/eog.10.44

49.

Mustaine

E. E.

Tewksbury

(2002). Sexual assault of college women: A feminist interpretation of a routine activities analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 27(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680202700106

50.

Park

Nordstrom

S. K.

Weber

K. M.

Irwin

(2016). Reproductive coercion: Uncloaking an imbalance of social power. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 214(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.045

51.

Paterno

M. T.

Draughon Moret

J. E.

Paskausky

Campbell

J. C.

(2021). Exploring reproductive coercion in relationship contexts among young adult, primarily African American women at three women’s health clinics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3-4), NP2248–2271NP. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518756116

52.

Paz

I. G.

(2021, October 8). California makes ‘stealthing,’ or removing condom without consent, illegal. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/08/us/stealthing-illegal-california.html

53.

PettyJohn

M. E.

Reid

T. A.

Miller

Bogen

K. W.

McCauley

H. L.

(2021). Reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and pregnancy risk among adolescent women with a history of foster care involvement. Children and Youth Services Review, 120(2021), 105731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105731

54.

Pinchevsky

G. M.

Magnuson

A. B.

Augustyn

M. B.

Rennison

C. M.

(2020). Sexual victimization and sexual harassment among college students: A comparative analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 35(6), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00082-y

55.

Reyns

B. W.

Scherer

(2019). Disability type and risk of sexual and stalking victimization in a national sample: A lifestyle–routine activity approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(4), 628–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818809148

56.

Rosenbaum

J. E.

DiClemente

R. J.

(2020). Reproductive coercion sometimes works: Evaluating whether young African-American women who experience reproductive coercion or birth control sabotage are more likely to become pregnant. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 20(4), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-020-00213-9

57.

Rosenfeld

E. A.

Miller

Zhao

Sileanu

F. E.

Mor

M. K.

Borrero

(2018). Male partner reproductive coercion among women veterans. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 218(2), 239e1–239e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.015

58.

Rothman

Exner

Baughman

A. L.

(2011). Systematic review of 75 studies that examine the prevalence of sexual assault victimization among gay or bisexual men and lesbian or bisexual women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 12(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838010390707

59.

Schwartz

M. D.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

Tait

Alvi

(2001). Male peer support and a feminist routing activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 623–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100095041

60.

Schwartz

M. D.

Pitts

V. L.

(1995). Exploring a feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829500092551

61.

Silverman

J. G.

Challa

Boyce

S. C.

Averbach

Raj

(2020). Associations of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence with overt and covert family planning use among married adolescent girls in Niger. EClinicalMedicine, 22, Article 100359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100359

62.

Snyder

J. A.

(2015). The link between ADHD and the risk of sexual victimization among college women: Expanding the lifestyles/routine activities framework. Violence Against Women, 21(11), 1364–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215593647

63.

Spector-Brigady

Mello

M. M.

(2022). Protecting the privacy of reproductive health information after the fall of Roe v Wade. JAMA Health Forum, 3(6), Article e222656. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2656

64.

Stark

Hester

(2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191

65.

Sutherland

M. A.

Fantasia

H. C.

Fontenot

(2015). Reproductive coercion and partner violence among college women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 44(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12550

66.

Sutton

T. E.

Simons

L. G.

Tyler

K. A.

(2021). Hooking-up and sexual victimization on campus: Examining moderators of risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15-16), NP8146–NP8175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519842178

67.

Swan

L. E.

Mennicke

Kim

(2021). Reproductive coercion and interpersonal violence victimization experiences among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23-24), 11281–11303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519898424

68.

Sween

Reyns

B. W.

(2017). An empirical test of target congruence theory on intimate partner violence. Deviant Behavior, 38(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1191914

69.

Sweeney

B. N.

(2011). The allure of the freshman girl: Peers, partying, and the sexual assault of first-year college women. Journal of College and Character, 12(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1790

70.

Tarzia

Hegarty

(2021). A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: Centring intent, fear and control. Reproductive Health, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6

71.

Tarzia

Srinivasan

Marino

Hegearty

(2020). Exploring the gray areas between “stealthing” and reproductive coercion and abuse. Women & Health, 60(10), 1174–1184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2020.1804517

72.

Tillyer

M. S.

Wilcox

Gialopsos

B. M.

(2010). Adolescent school-based sexual victimization: Exploring the role of opportunity in a gender-specific multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.010

73.

University of Kentucky. (n.d.). C.A.T.S—Campus attitudes toward safety, 2016. Center for Research on Violence against Women, University of Kentucky. https://www.uky.edu/CATSseesafety/

74.

Upadhyay

U. D.

Dworkin

S. L.

Weitz

T. A.

Foster

D. G.

(2014). Development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale. Studies in Family Planning, 45(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00374.x

75.

van der Heijden

G. J.

Donders

A. R. T.

Stijnen

Moons

K. G.

(2006). Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: A clinical example. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(10), 1102–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.015

76.

Willie

T. C.

Alexander

K. A.

Caplon

Kershaw

T. S.

Safon

C. B.

Galvao

R. W.

Kaplan

Caldwell

Calabrese

S. K.

(2021). Birth control sabotage as a correlate of women’s sexual health risk: An exploratory study. Women’s Health Issues, 31(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2020.10.003