The prosecution of domestic violence remains a complex process within criminal policy in Belgium. Evidence is often reliant on medical certificates or injury reports, necessary for victims who want to file official complaints. However, medical evidencing is a contentious issue. Based on qualitative research among public prosecutors, victims, and general practitioners in Belgium, this study analyses the challenges these groups face through an ethics of care lens. Despite their crucial importance in legal procedures, the use of certificates is surrounded by contradictions. The issues point to an unequal distribution of responsibilities, which masks institutional and political responsibilities and enhances the responsibilization of victims.
BishopC. (2016). Domestic violence: The limitations of a legal response. In HilderS.BettinsonV. (Eds.), Domestic violence (pp. 59–79). Springer.
2.
BraunV.ClarkeV.HayfieldN.TerryG. (2019). Thematic analysis. In LiamputtongP. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social science (pp. 843–860). Springer Nature.
3.
BurtonM. (2008). Legal responses to domestic violence. Routledge-Cavendish.
4.
CetinaK. K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801807X163571
5.
ComackE.PeterT. (2005). How the criminal justice system responds to sexual assault survivors: The slippage between responsibilization and blaming the victim. Canadian Journal of Women & Law, 17(2), 283–309.
6.
Council of Europe (2011). Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence.https://rm.coe.int/168008482e.
7.
CoyM.KellyL. (2019). The responsibilisation of women who experience domestic violence: A case study from England and Wales. In Hagemann-WhiteC.KellyL.MeysenT. (Eds.), Interventions against child abuse and violence against women (pp. 151–162). Verlag Barbara Budrich.
8.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
9.
De DekenL.PasL.HillemansK.CornelisE. (2010). De huisarts in contact met partnergeweld. Een evidence-based onderbouwd werkmodel [The general practitioner in contact with partner violence. An evidence-based model for practice]. Huisarts Nu, 39(9), 339–345.
DziewaA.GlowaczF. (2021). Getting out from intimate partner violence: Dynamics and processes. A qualitative analysis of female and male victims’ narratives. Journal of Family Violence, 37(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00245-2
12.
FassinD. (2011). The trace: Violence, truth, and the politics of the body. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 78(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2011.0018
13.
FinnM. A. (2013). Evidence-based and victim-centered prosecutorial policies: Examination of deterrent and therapeutic jurisprudence effects on domestic violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(3), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12046
14.
GangoliG.BatesL.HesterM. (2020). What does justice mean to black and minority ethnic (BME) victims/survivors of gender-based violence?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(15), 3119–3135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1650010
15.
GoddardT. (2012). Post-welfarist risk managers? Risk, crime prevention and the responsibilization of community-based organizations. Theoretical Criminology, 16(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480611433432
16.
GrantI. (2014). Intimate partner criminal harassment through a lens of responsibilization. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 52(2), 551–591.
17.
Hagemann-WhiteC. (2019). Foundations in ethical theory to guide intervention against gender-based and intergenerational violence. In Hagemann-WhiteC.KellyL.MeysenT. (Eds.), Interventions against child abuse and violence against women (pp. 49–74). Verlag Barbara Budrich.
18.
HearnJ. (2013). The sociological significance of domestic violence: Tensions, paradoxes and implications. Current Sociology, 61(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112456503
19.
HeldV. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.
20.
HeldV. (2015). Care and justice, still. In EngsterD.HamingtonM. (Eds.), Care ethics and political theory (pp. 19–36). Oxford University Press.
21.
HolmesD.MurrayS. J.PerronA.RailG. (2006). Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences: Truth, power and fascism. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 4(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2006.00041.x
IsaacN. E.EnosV. P. (2001). Documenting domestic violence: How health care providers can help victims. Retrieved on 27 January 2021. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/188564.pdf
25.
KellyL.WestmarlandN. (2016). Naming and defining ‘domestic violence’: Lessons from research with violent men. Feminist Review, 112(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.52
26.
KhazaeiF. (2021). The truth told by the body: Swiss medicolegal responses to intimate partner violence from a gender perspective. Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies, 24(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2021.2.007.KHAZ
27.
KnezevicZ. (2021). Speaking bodies–silenced voices: Child protection and the knowledge culture of ‘evidencing’. Global Studies of Childhood, 11(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610620951977
28.
MeyerS. (2016). Still blaming the victim of intimate partner violence? Women’s narratives of victim desistance and redemption when seeking support. Theoretical Criminology, 20(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615585399
29.
MiriA. (2020). Bridging colonial feminist discourses and migrant women’s lived realities: Mediators’ narratives on the tensions and ambiguities within marriage migration policy in Belgium. Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies, 23(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2020.1.003.MIRI
30.
Openbaar Ministerie. (2015). Omzendbrief COL4/2006 (herzien op 12.10.2015) - Gemeenschappelijke omzendbrief van de Minister van justitie en het College van procureurs-generaal betreffende het strafrechtelijk beleid inzake partnergeweld [Circular COL4/2006 (revised on 12.10.2015) – Joint circular of the minister of justice and the board of attorneys-general on the criminal policy with concern to partner violence].
RobinsonA.JohnsonH.FisherB.JaquierV. (2015). Pie in the sky? The use of criminal justice policies and practices for intimate partner violence. In Critical Issues on Violence Against Women: International Perspectives and Promising Strategies (pp. 66–76). Routledge.
33.
RobinsonA.PinchevskyG. M.GuthrieJ. A. (2016). Under the radar: Policing non-violent domestic abuse in the US and UK. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 40(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2015.1114001
SevenhuijsenS. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality, and politics. Psychology Press.
36.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204271476
37.
StankoE. A. (1997). Safety talk: Conceptualizing women's risk assessment as a technology of the soul. Theoretical Criminology, 1(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480697001004004
38.
StarkE. (2009). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
39.
TamD. M.TuttyL. M.ZhuangZ. H.PazE. (2016). Racial minority women and criminal justice responses to domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9794-7
40.
TrontoJ. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
41.
TrontoJ. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. NYU Press.
42.
VannesteC. (2016). Het strafrechtelijk beleid op het vlak van partnergeweld: Een evaluatie van de rechtspraktijk en de gevolgen ervan inzake recidive. Eindrapport [The criminal policy with concern to intimate partner violence: An evaluation of legal practice and its impact on recidivism. Final report]. Retrieved on 17 November 2017, https://nicc.fgov.be/upload/files/ODcriminologie/nl-rapport_cvanneste_vicmai2016.pdf
43.
van NistelrooijI.VisseM. (2019). Me? The invisible call of responsibility and its promise for care ethics: A phenomenological view. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 22(2), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9873-7
44.
VergaertE.WithaeckxS.CoeneG. (2021). Betrokken vertwijfeling: Een intersectionele analyse van partnergeweld in de huisartsenpraktijk [Involved concern: An intersectional analysis of IPV in the general practice]. Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies, 24(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2021.2.008.WITH
45.
VergaertE.WithaeckxS.CoeneG. (2022). “Watchful waiting”: Everyday ethical caring practices of general practitioners in cases of intimate partner violence. International Journal of Care and Caring, early view, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221X16478612581252
46.
WalkerM. U. (2006). Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press.
47.
WalkerM. U. (2007). Moral understandings: A feminist study in ethics. Oxford University Press.
48.
WalklateS.Fitz-GibbonK.McCullochJ. (2018). Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through the reform of legal categories. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728561
49.
WeiserD. A. (2017). Confronting myths about sexual assault: A feminist analysis of the false report literature. Family Relations, 66(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12235
50.
WesteraN. J.PowellM. B. (2017). Prosecutors’ perceptions of how to improve the quality of evidence in domestic violence cases. Policing and Society, 27(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1039002
51.
WilkersonA. L. (2019). “Her body Her own worst enemy”: The medicalization of violence against women. In TeaysW. (Ed.), Analyzing violence against women (pp. 131–147). Springer.
52.
WolfM. E.LyU.HobartM. A.KernicM. A. (2003). Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022893231951
