How Helpful Is Bystander Intervention? Perspectives of Dating and Sexual Violence Survivors

Abstract

While bystander intervention education has demonstrated promise as a strategy to reduce dating and sexual violence (DSV) on campus, little is known about whether survivors on whose behalf the interventions take place find these helpful. This paper uses qualitative, in-depth interviews with 33 DSV survivors to explore their perspectives on bystander intervention. Results indicate that while some interventions were identified as helpful, especially those that provided support to the survivor, many were not helpful enough or even harmful. Further work is needed to understand the consequences of bystander action.

Keywords

Bystander intervention dating and sexual violence college campuses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banyard, V., Jefferson, G. C., Segura, A., Forman, S. G., Haviland, M., Mcmahon, S., DeSilva, A. R., Frye, V., & Sarkar, S. (2021). Feasibility and acceptability of engaging significant adults in youth sexual and relationship violence prevention work. Violence Against Women, 10778012211034201.

Banyard

Moschella

Grych

Jouriles

. (2019). What happened next? New measures of consequences of bystander actions to prevent interpersonal violence. Psychology of Violence, 9(6), 664–674. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000229

Banyard

V. L

. (2011). Who will help prevent sexual assault: Creating an ecological model for bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023739

Banyard

V. L.

(2015). Bystander prevention of sexual and relationship violence: Action coils to engage communities. Springer International Publishing.

Berkowitz

(2009). Response ability: Transforming values into action. Beck.

Braun

Clarke

. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Campbell

Adams

Wasco

Ahrens

Sefl

. (2010). “What has it been like for you to talk with me today?”: The impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209353576

Casey

Storer

H. L.

Herrenkohl

T. I

. (2018). Mapping a continuum of adolescent helping and bystander behavior within the context of dating violence and bullying. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 88(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000245

Coker

A. L.

Fisher

B. S.

Bush

H. M.

Swan

S. C.

Williams

C. M.

Clear

E. R.

DeGue

. (2015). Evaluation of the green dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21(12), 1507–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214545284

10.

Dovidio

Piliavin

J. A.

Schroeder

Penner

(2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

11.

Dworkin

Brill

Ullman

. (2019). Social reactions to disclosure of interpersonal violence and psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, Article 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101750

12.

Edwards

K. M.

Dardis

C. M.

Sylaska

K. M.

Gidycz

C. A

. (2015). Informal social reactions to college women’s disclosure of intimate partner violence: Associations with psychological and relational variables. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514532524

13.

Hamby

Weber

M. C.

Grych

Banyard

V. L

. (2016). What difference do bystanders make? The association of victim outcomes with bystander involvement in a community sample. Psychology of Violence, 6(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039073

14.

Harris

J. C.

Linder

(2017). Intersections of identity and sexual violence on campus: Centering minoritized students’ experiences. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

15.

Hirsch

J. S.

Khan

(2020). Sexual citizens: A landmark study of sex, power, and assault on campus. Norton.

16.

Hoxmeier

J. C.

McMahon

. (2021). Victim/survivor perception of bystander helpfulness in dating abuse situations. Journal of College Student Development, 62(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0050

17.

Hoxmeier

J. C.

O’Connor

McMahon

. (2020). Men’s perspectives on risk identification, taking responsibility, and prosocial intervention: Primary prevention or harm reduction? Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000212

18.

Jones

L. M.

Mitchell

K. J.

Turner

H. A

. (2015). Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: A national survey of adolescents. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 44(12), 2308–2320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0342-9

19.

Jouriles

E. N.

Krauss

N. L.

Banyard

V. L.

McDonald

. (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906

20.

Katz

Moore

. (2013). Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 28(6), 1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00113

21.

Krauss

Jouriles

Yule

Grych

J. H.

Sargent

Banyard

V. L

. (2021). Adverse consequences to assisting victims of campus violence: Initial investigations among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3–4), NP1607–NP1624.

22.

Macy

Johns

Rizo

Martin

Giattina

. (2011). Domestic violence and sexual assault service goal priorities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(16), 3361–3382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510393003

23.

McMahon

Banyard

V. L

. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for preventing violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 13 (1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015

24.

McMahon

Burnham

Banyard

V. L

. (2020). Bystander intervention as a prevention strategy for campus sexual violence: Perceptions of historically minoritized college students. Prevention Science, 21(6), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01134-2

25.

McMahon

Hoffman

McMahon

S. M.

Zucker

Koenick

R. A

. (2013). What would you do? Sexual violence bystander intervention strategies for college students. Journal of College and Character, 14(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcc-2013-0019

26.

McMahon

Steiner

Snyder

Banyard

. (2019). Comprehensive prevention of campus sexual violence: Expanding who is invited to the table. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019883275

27.

Moschella

E. A.

Banyard

V. L

. (2021). Action and reaction: The impact of consequences of intervening in situations of interpersonal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), NP3820–NP3843. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518782983

28.

Moschella

E. A.

Bennett

Banyard

V. L

. (2016). Beyond the situational model: Bystander action consequences to intervening in situations involving sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(20), 3211–3231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516635319

29.

Patton

M. Q.

(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.

30.

Sabina

L. Y

. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521322

31.

Taylor

Banyard

Grych

Hamby

. (2019). Not all behind closed doors: Examining bystander involvement in intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(18), 3915–3935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516673629

32.

Witte

Casper

Hackman

Mulla

. (2017). Bystander interventions for sexual assault and dating violence on college campuses: Are we putting bystanders in harm’s way? Journal of American College Health, 65(3), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2016.1264407