This brief commentary is a response to the helpful responses to our article on the problem of the concept of gentle violence in obstetric care. We find ourselves in substantial agreement with our interlocutors. We suggest that naming individual actions on the part of health care personnel as violent may not be necessary for changing the behavior of these personnel and may in fact impede change. We suggest further that requiring health care personnel to accept our definitions of violence may in itself be an oppressive or epistemically violent act, probably less likely to lead to desired change than other approaches. We emphasize the need for more dialogue on victimology and the discursive complexities of trying to intervene in situations of structural violence.
AbrahamsN.MathewsS.LombardC.MartinL. J.JewkesR. (2017). Sexual homicides in South Africa: A national cross-sectional epidemiological study of adult women and children. PLoS ONE, 12(10), Article e0186432.
2.
BeharR. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Beacon Press.
BenjaminJ. (2017). Beyond doer and done to: Recognition theory, intersubjectivity and the third. Taylor & Francis.
5.
BrodieN. (2020). Femicide in South Africa. NB Publishers.
6.
BurnettC. (2021). Commentary on the article “How gentle must violence against women be in order to not be violent? Rethinking the word violence in obstetric settings,” reframed within a critical discourse orientation. Violence Against Women.
7.
Byrne-DavisL. M. T.BullE. R.BurtonA.DharniN.GillisonF.MaltinskyW.MasonC.SharmaN.ArmitageC. J.JohnstonM.ByrneG. J.HartJ. K. (2017). How behavioural science can contribute to health partnerships: The case of The Change Exchange. Globalization and Health, 13(1), 1–8.
8.
ChadwickR. J. (2016). Obstetric violence in South Africa. SAMJ: South African Medical Journal, 106(5), 423–424. https://doi.org/10.4314/sacq.v5i1.1
9.
ChatterjeeP. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press.
10.
ChaudhryV. (2015). Neoliberal disorientations: Changing landscapes of disability and governance in India. Disability & Society, 30(8), 1158–1173.
11.
FoucaultM. (2019). The history of sexuality: 1: The will to knowledge. Penguin.
HollwayW.JeffersonT. (2012). Doing qualitative research differently: A psychosocial approach. Sage.
14.
KiddI. J.CarelH. (2017). Epistemic injustice and illness. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(2), 172–190.
15.
KittayE. F. (2019). Learning from my daughter: The value and care of disabled minds. Oxford University Press.
16.
LappemanM. (in press). I want to run away: Reflections of a participant-observer. In SinasonV.SachsA. (Eds.), Out of hours: Boundary attunement with extreme trauma. Routledge.
17.
LappemanM.SwartzL. (2019). Care and the politics of shame: Medical practitioners and stillbirths in a South African district hospital. Psychodynamic Practice, 25, 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2019.1670093
18.
LévesqueS.Ferron-ParayreA. (2021). To use or not to use the term “obstetric violence”: Commentary on the article by Lappeman and Swartz. Violence Against Women.
19.
MbembeA. (2001). On the postcolony. University of California Press.
20.
MbembeA. (2019). Necropolitics. Duke University Press.
21.
PearsonE.Byrne-DavisL.BullE.HartJ. (2020). Behavior change techniques in health professional training: Developing a coding tool. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(1), 96–102.
22.
Ryan-FloodR.GillR. (2013). Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. Routledge.
23.
SalterC. L.OlaniyanA.MendezD. D.ChangJ. C. (2021). Naming silence and inadequate obstetric care as obstetric violence is a necessary step for change. Violence Against Women.
24.
SenG.ReddyB.IyerA. (2018). Beyond measurement: The drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care. Reproductive Health Matters, 26(53), 6–18.
25.
ShapiroJ. (2018). “Violence” in medicine: Necessary and unnecessary, intentional and unintentional. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 13(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-018-0059-y
26.
SundelM.SundelS. S. (2017). Behavior change in the human services: Behavioral and cognitive principles and applications. Sage.
27.
SwartzL. (in press). Culture, concealment and the murderous politics of exclusion of persons with intellectual disabilities in South Africa. In KatsuiH.MesiäislehtoV. (Eds.), Disability and development: Embodied inequalities. Helsinki University Press.
28.
SwartzL. (2007). The virtues of feeling culturally incompetent. Monash Bioethics Review, 26(4), 36–46.
29.
SwartzL. (2018). Building capacity or enforcing normalcy? Engaging with disability scholarship in Africa. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1416801
30.
SwartzL.HuntX.WatermeyerB.CarewM.BraathenS. H.RohlederP. (2018). Symbolic violence and the invisibility of disability. African Safety Promotion: A Journal of Injury and Violence Prevention, 16(2), 21–30.
31.
SwartzL.Marchetti-MercerM. (2018). Disabling Africa: The power of depiction and the benefits of discomfort. Disability & Society, 33(3), 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2017.1400240
32.
van der HeijdenI.AbrahamsN.HarriesJ. (2019). Additional layers of violence: The intersections of gender and disability in the violence experiences of women with physical disabilities in South Africa. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(4), 826–847.
