The current arricle describes a novel recruitment protocol for collecting data from sexual assault and intimate partner violence survivors referred to research studies by individuals to whom they had previously disclosed. Challenges in both recruiting participants and interpreting data are described. Only 35.8% of cases had usable data for both survivors and disclosure recipients, suggesting that this referral method had limited success in recruiting matched pairs. Suggestions for modifications to improve the protocol for future research are offered. Potential advantages and drawbacks of various methods for recruiting dyads are described in order to facilitate future research on survivors’ disclosure processes, social reactions, and the influence of social reactions on survivor recovery.
AhrensC. E.AldanaE. (2012). The ties that bind: Understanding the impact of sexual assault disclosure on victims’ relationships with friends, family, and partners. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 13(2), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2012.642738
2.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.WalshW. A.CohnE. S.WardS. (2010). Friends of victims: The community impact of unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(2), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334407
3.
CampbellR. M. (2005). What really happened? A validation study of rape victims’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence and Victims, 20(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2005.20.1.55
DavisR. C.BrickmanE. (1996). Supportive and unsupportive aspects of the behavior of others toward victims of sexual and nonsexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(2), 250-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626096011002008
6.
DworkinE. R.AllenN. E. (2017). For the good of the group? Balancing individual and collective risks and benefits in community psychology research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3-4), 391-397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12184
7.
DworkinE. R.BrillC. D.UllmanS. E. (2019). Social reactions to disclosure of interpersonal violence and psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 56(72), 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101750
8.
EdwardsK.WatermanE.UllmanS.RodriguezL.DardisC.DworkinE. A. (2020). A pilot evaluation of an intervention to improve social reactions to sexual and partner violence disclosures. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520934437
9.
EdwardsK. M.DardisC. M. (2020). Disclosure recipients’ social reactions to victims’ disclosures of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(1-2), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516681155
10.
FalconierM.KuhnR. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571
11.
LorenzK.UllmanS. E.KirknerA.MandalaR.VasquezA.SigurvinsdottirR. (2018). Social reactions to sexual assault disclosure: A qualitative study of informal support dyads. Violence Against Women, 24(12), 1497-1520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217732428
12.
PaulL.SassonS. (2013). Post-assault social support: The role of others in helping sexual assault victims recover. In K. Bletzer (Ed.), Assaults: Interventions, preventive strategies, and societal implications (pp. 51-82). Nova Science Publishers.
13.
PaulL. A.WalshK.McCauleyJ. L.RuggieroK. J.ResnickH. S.KilpatrickD. G. (2014). Characteristics and life experiences associated with receiving a rape disclosure within a national telephone household probability sample of women. Journal of Community Psychology, 42(5), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21639
14.
PotterS. J.EdwardsK. M. (2015). Institutional title IX requirements for researchers conducting human subjects research on sexual violence and other forms of interpersonal violence. Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire. www.cola.unh.edu/prevention-innovations-research-center
15.
RodriguezL. M.NeighborsC. (2015). An interdependent look at perceptions of spousal drinking problems and marital outcomes. Alcohol, 49(6), 597-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2015.05.002
16.
SabinaC.HoL. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521322
SylaskaK. M.EdwardsK. M. (2014). Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013496335
19.
UllmanS. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. American Psychological Association Press.
20.
UllmanS. E.LorenzK.KirknerA. (2017). Alcohol’s role in social reactions to sexual assault disclosure: A qualitative study of informal support dyads. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23-24), 5365-5389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517721172
21.
WardA.RossL.ReedE.TurielE.BrownT. (1997). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. Values and Knowledge, 103-135.
