Perceptions of Common Rape: How Rape Myth Acceptance,Victim Gender,and Victim Resistance Affect Victim and Perpetrator Blame Attributions in Party Rape and Date Rape

Abstract

Among rape perception studies, common types of male rape remain understudied. Using a randomized vignette design, I sampled 622 college students from a large Southwestern university to examine how victim gender and victim resistance influence blame attributions in party rape and date rape. Results revealed important interactions between victim gender, victim resistance, and rape type. Among other effects, resistance only affected victim blame in date rapes involving male victims. Results indicated that how respondents perceive victim and perpetrator responsibility, and which factors influence these perceptions, vary across rape type and victim gender. Implications for the rape perception literature are discussed.

Keywords

rape myths male rape blame attributions resistance party rape

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbey

Zawacki

Buck

P. O.

Clinton

A. M.

McAuslan

(2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research still needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(3), 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00011-9

Amir

(1971). Patterns in forcible rape. University of Chicago Press.

Ashmore

R. D.

Del Boca

F. K.

Bilder

S. M.

(1995). Construction and validation of the gender attitude inventory, a structured inventory to assess multiple dimensions of gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 32(11), 753–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560188

Auspurg

Hinz

(2014). Factorial survey experiments (Vol. 175). Sage.

Ayala

E. E.

Kotary

Hetz

(2018). Blame attributions of victims and perpetrators: Effects of victim gender, perpetrator gender, and relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515599160

Bennett

Adamowicz

(2001). The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation. Edward Elger Publishing, Inc.

Bieneck

Krahé

(2011). Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(9), 1785–1797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510372945

Black

K. A.

McCloskey

K. A.

(2013). Predicting date rape perceptions: The effects of gender, gender role attitudes, and victim resistance. Violence Against Women, 19(8), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213499244

Bohner

Jarvis

C. I.

Eyssel

Siebler

(2005). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(6), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.284

10.

Burt

M. R.

(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217

11.

Davies

Gilston

Rogers

(2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438281

12.

Davies

Pollard

Archer

(2001). The influence of victim gender and sexual orientation on judgments of the victim in a depicted stranger rape. Violence and Victims, 16(6), 607–619. ISSN 0886-6708

13.

Davies

Rogers

(2006). Perceptions of male victims in depicted sexual assaults: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(4), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.002

14.

Davies

Rogers

Bates

J. A.

(2008). Blame toward male rape victims in a hypothetical sexual assault as a function of victim sexuality and degree of resistance. Journal of Homosexuality, 55(3), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802345339

15.

Davies

Rogers

Whitelegg

(2009). Effects of victim gender, victim sexual orientation, victim response and respondent gender on judgements of blame in a hypothetical adolescent rape. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(2), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1348/978185408X386030

16.

Dinos

Burrowes

Hammond

Cunliffe

(2015). A systematic review of juries’ assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.07.001

17.

Edwards

K. M.

Turchik

J. A.

Dardis

C. M.

Reynolds

Gidycz

C. A.

(2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65(11-12), 761–773. https://doi.10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2

18.

Estrich

(1987). Real rape. Harvard University Press.

19.

Eyssel

Bohner

(2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1579–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370593

20.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

21.

Fedina

Holmes

J. L.

Backes

B. L.

(2018). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631129

22.

Frohmann

(1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/800530

23.

Gerber

G. L.

Cronin

J. M.

Steigman

H. J.

(2004). Attributions of blame in sexual assault to perpetrators and victims of both genders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2149–2165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02694.x

24.

Gilbert

Sarvet

A. L.

Wall

Walsh

Reardon

Wilson

, Santelli, J., Khan, S., Thompson, M., Hirsch, J. S., & Mellins

C. A.

(2019). Situational contexts and risk factors associated with incapacitated and nonincapacitated sexual assaults among college women. Journal of Women's Health, 28(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7191

25.

Girard

A. L.

Senn

C. Y.

(2008). The role of the new “date rape drugs” in attributions about date rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507307648

26.

Gravelin

C. R.

Biernat

Bucher

C. E.

(2019). Blaming the victim of acquaintance rape: Individual, situational, and sociocultural factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2422), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02422

27.

Gross

A. M.

Winslett

Roberts

Gohm

C. L.

(2006). An examination of sexual violence against college women. Violence Against Women, 12(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205277358

28.

Grubb

Turner

(2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002

29.

Heath

N. M.

Lynch

S. M.

Fritch

A. M.

Wong

M. M.

(2013). Rape myth acceptance impacts the reporting of rape to the police: A study of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 19(9), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213501841

30.

Hensher

D. A.

Rose

J. M.

Greene

W. H.

(2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge University Press.

31.

Hine

Murphy

(2019). The influence of ‘high’ vs. ‘low’ rape myth acceptance on police officers’ judgements of victim and perpetrator responsibility, and rape authenticity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.08.001

32.

Hockett

J. M.

Saucier

D. A.

Badke

(2015). Rape myths, rape scripts, and common rape experiences of college women: Differences in perceptions of women who have been raped. Violence Against Women, 22(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215599844

33.

Idsis

Edoute

(2017). Attribution of blame to rape victims and offenders, and attribution of severity in rape cases: Non-therapists and survivor and offender therapists. International Review of Victimology, 23, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758017711980

34.

Jordan

(2004). Beyond belief? Police, rape and women's credibility. Criminal Justice, 4(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802504042222

35.

Kassing

L. R.

Prieto

L. R.

(2003). The rape myth and blame-based beliefs of counselors-in-training toward male victims of rape. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00272.x

36.

Krahé

Temkin

Bieneck

(2007). Schema-driven information processing in judgements about rape. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1297

37.

Krahé

Temkin

Bieneck

Berger

(2008). Prospective lawyers’ rape stereotypes and schematic decision making about rape cases. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(5), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801932380

38.

Krebs

C. P.

Lindquist

C. H.

Warner

T. D.

Fisher

B. S.

Martin

S. L.

(2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study: Final report. National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.

39.

Little

R. J.

(1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157

40.

Littleton

Grills-Taquechel

Axsom

(2009). Impaired and incapacitated rape victims: Assault characteristics and post-assault experiences. Violence and Victims, 24(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.24.4.439

41.

Lorenz

Ullman

S. E.

(2016). Alcohol and sexual assault victimization: Research findings and future directions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.08.001

42.

McMahon

Farmer

G. L.

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71

43.

Melanson

P. S. K.

(1998). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories. [Doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, 1999]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 5620.

44.

Mitchell

Angelone

D. J.

Kohlberger

Hirschman

(2009). Effects of offender motivation, victim gender, and participant gender on perceptions of rape victims and offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(9), 1564–1578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508323662

45.

Morabito

M. S.

Pattavina

Williams

L. M.

(2019). It all just piles up: Challenges to victim credibility accumulate to influence sexual assault case processing. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(15), 3151–3170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516669164

46.

Osman

S. L.

(2003). Predicting men's rape perceptions based on the belief that “no” really means “yes”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01919.x

47.

Oswald

D. L.

Russell

B. L.

(2006). Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: The role of aggressor gender and tactics. Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552302

48.

Parratt

K. A.

Pina

(2017). From “real rape” to real justice: A systematic review of police officers’ rape myth beliefs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.03.005

49.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

50.

Peterson

R. A.

(1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405

51.

Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (2020a, November). Victims of sexual violence: Statistics. https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence.

52.

Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (2020b, November). The criminal justice system: Statistics. https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system.

53.

Romero-Sánchez

Krahé

Moya

Megías

J. L.

(2018). Alcohol-related victim behavior and rape myth acceptance as predictors of victim blame in sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 24(9), 1052–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217727372

54.

Shafer

Ortiz

R. R.

Thompson

Huemmer

(2018). The role of hypermasculinity, token resistance, rape myth, and assertive sexual consent communication among college men. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(3), S44–S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.015

55.

Shaw

Campbell

Cain

Feeney

(2017). Beyond surveys and scales: How rape myths manifest in sexual assault police records. Psychology of Violence, 7(4), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000072

56.

Sleath

Bull

(2010). Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(6), 969–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509340534

57.

Sleath

Bull

(2017). Police perceptions of rape victims and the impact on case decision making: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.02.003

58.

Spohn

Beichner

Davis-Frenzel

(2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice”. Social Problems, 48(2), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2001.48.2.206

59.

Stewart

M. W.

Dobbin

Gatowski

S. I.

(1996). “Real rapes” and “real victims”: The shared reliance on common cultural definitions of rape. Feminist Legal Studies, 4(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02167608

60.

St. George

Spohn

(2018). Liberating discretion: The effect of rape myth factors on prosecutors’ decisions to charge suspects in penetrative and non-penetrative sex offenses. Justice Quarterly, 35(7), 1280–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1529251

61.

St. George

Verhagan

Spohn

(2022). Detectives’ descriptions of their responses to sexual assault cases and victims: Assessing the overlap between rape myths and focal concerns. Police Quarterly, 25(1), 90–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211037592

62.

Strömwall

L. A.

Alfredsson

Landström

(2013). Rape victim and perpetrator blame and the just world hypothesis: The influence of victim gender and age. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2012.683455

63.

Suarez

Gadalla

T. M.

(2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503

64.

Süssenbach

Eyssel

Bohner

(2013). Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(11), 2250–2272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512475317

65.

Süssenbach

Eyssel

Rees

Bohner

(2017). Looking for blame: Rape myth acceptance and attention to victim and perpetrator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(15), 2323–2344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591975

66.

Turchik

J. A.

Edwards

K. M.

(2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023207

67.

Ullman

S. E.

Karabatsos

Koss

M. P.

(1999). Alcohol and sexual assault in a national sample of college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(6), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014006003

68.

U.S Department of Justice: Federal Bureau of Investigation (2017, February). Crime in the United States, 2014: Rape addendum. Retrieved from: https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/resource-pages/rape-addendum.pdf.

69.

Van der Bruggen

Grubb

(2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008

70.

Venema

R. M.

(2016). Police officer schema of sexual assault reports: Real rape, ambiguous cases, and false reports. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(5), 872–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514556765