Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Knowing a sexual assault victim and general self-efficacy (GSE) were examined as predictors of rape myth acceptance (RMA) among university students. Where knowing a sexual assault victim was associated with greater rejection of rape myths among female students, most notably White females, a null effect occurred on male students, except for Black males whose RMA increased. Higher self-efficacy predicted the overall rejection of rape myths differently among identity intersections, most prominently with victim blaming. Knowing a sexual assault victim moderated GSE and RMA for male students and Latinos. These findings offer practical and critical implications as universities grow in diversity.

Keywords

rape myth acceptance sexual assault efficacy gender differences racial/ethnic differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aosved

A. C.

Long

P. J.

(2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55(7–8), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura

(1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.

Bannon

R. S.

Brosi

M. W.

Foubert

J. D.

(2013). Sorority women’s and fraternity men’s rape myth acceptance and bystander intervention attitudes. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 50(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2013-0005

Banyard

V. L.

Moynihan

M. M.

Plante

E. G.

(2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20159

Banyard

V. L.

Plante

E. G.

Moynihan

M. M.

(2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10078

Bondurant

(2001). University women’s acknowledgment of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 294-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801201007003004

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (Number of rape/sexual assaults 1993–2019) (2020). Generated using the NCVS Victimization Analysis Tool (NVAT) at www.bjs.gov

Burt

M. R.

(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217

10.

Canan

S. N.

Jozkowski

K. N.

Crawford

B. L.

(2018). Sexual assault supportive attitudes: Rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3502-3530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636064

11.

Cantor

Fisher

Chibnall

Harps

Townsend

Thomas

Lee

Kranz

Herbison

Madden

(2020). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Association of American Universities . https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU-Files/Key-Issues/Campus-Safety/Revised%20Aggregate%20report%20%20and%20appendices%201-7_(01-16-2020_FINAL).pdf

12.

Carmody

D. C.

Washington

L. M.

(2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(5), 424-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016005003

13.

Coker

A. L.

Follingstad

D. R.

Bush

H. M.

Fisher

(2016). Are interpersonal violence rates higher among young women in college compared with those never attending college? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(8), 1413-1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514567958

14.

Cowan

(2000). Beliefs about the causes of four types of rape. Sex Roles, 42(9/10), 807-823. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007042215614

15.

Crenshaw

K. W.

(2010). Close encounters of three kinds: On teaching dominance feminism and intersectionality. Tulsa Law Review, 46(1), 151-189.

16.

Dinos

Burrowes

Hammond

Cunliffe

(2015). A systematic review of juries’ assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.07.001

17.

Du Mont

Miller

K.-L.

Myhr

T. L.

(2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9(4), 466-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801202250960

18.

Emmers-Sommer

T. M.

(2017). College student perceptions of hypothetical rape disclosures: Do relational and demographic variables pose a risk on disclosure believability? Sexuality & Culture, 21(3), 664-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9411-4

19.

Foubert

J. D.

Perry

B. C.

(2007). Creating lasting attitude and behavior change in fraternity members and male student athletes the qualitative impact of an empathy-based rape prevention program. Violence Against Women, 13(1), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206295125

20.

Frese

Moya

Megías

J. L.

(2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503260245

21.

Giacopassi

D. J.

Dull

R. T.

(1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15(1–2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287532

22.

Gidycz

C. A.

Orchowski

L. M.

Berkowitz

A. D.

(2011). Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 720-742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211409727

23.

Hahn

C. K.

Hahn

A. M.

Gaster

Quevillon

(2020). Predictors of college students’ likelihood to report hypothetical rape: Rape myth acceptance, perceived barriers to reporting, and self-efficacy. Ethics & Behavior, 30(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1552519

24.

Hayes

R. M.

Abbott

R. L.

Cook

(2016). It’s her fault: Student acceptance of rape myths on two college campuses. Violence Against Women, 22(13), 1540-1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216630147

25.

Heath

N. M.

Lynch

S. M.

Fritch

A. M.

Wong

M. M.

(2013). Rape myth acceptance impacts the reporting of rape to the police: A study of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 19(9), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213501841

26.

Hockett

J. M.

Smith

S. J.

Klausing

C. D.

Saucier

D. A.

(2016). Rape myth consistency and gender differences in perceiving rape victims: A meta-analysis. Violence Against Women, 22(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215607359

27.

Hoffmann

C. P.

Lutz

(2019). Digital divides in political participation: The mediating role of social media self-efficacy and privacy concerns. Policy & Internet, 13(4), 6-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.225

28.

hooks

(1981). Ain’t I A woman/black women and feminism (2nd ed.). Routledge.

29.

Hust

S. J. T.

Rodgers

K. B.

Ebreo

Stefani

(2019). Rape myth acceptance, efficacy, and heterosexual scripts in men’s magazines: Factors associated with intentions to sexually coerce or intervene. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(8), 1703-1733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516653752

30.

Jaffe

A. E.

Cero

DiLillo

(2021). The #MeToo movement and perceptions of sexual assault: College students’ recognition of sexual assault experiences over time. Psychology of Violence, 11(2), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000363

31.

Johnson

B. E.

Kuck

D. L.

Schander

P. R.

(1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36(11), 693-707. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025671021697

32.

Kettrey

H. H.

Marx

R. A.

(2019). The effects of bystander programs on the prevention of sexual assault across the college years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 48(2), 212-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0927-1

33.

Kunst

J. R.

Bailey

Prendergast

Gundersen

(2019). Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the #metoo social media campaign in two countries. Media Psychology, 22(5), 818-843. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1532300

34.

Labhardt

Holdsworth

Brown

Howat

(2017). You see but you do not observe: A review of bystander intervention and sexual assault on university campuses. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.005

35.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

Foubert

J. D.

Brasfield

H. M.

Hill

Shelley-Tremblay

(2011). The men’s program: Does it impact college men’s self-reported bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene? Violence Against Women, 17(6), 743-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211409728

36.

Lee

F. L. F.

(2010). The perceptual bases of collective efficacy and protest participation: The case of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 392-411. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq023

37.

Lefley

H. P.

Scott

C. S.

Liabre

Hicks

(1993). Cultural beliefs about rape and victims’ response in three ethnic groups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63(4), 623-632. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079477

38.

Levy

Mattsson

(2020). The effects of social movements: Evidence from #MeToo . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3496903

39.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x

40.

Lubell

Zahran

Vedlitz

(2007). Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Political Behavior, 29(3), 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2

41.

McMahon

(2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.483715

42.

McMahon

Farmer

G. L.

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71

43.

Miller

Tancredi

D. J.

McCauley

H. L.

Decker

M. R.

Virata

M. C. D.

Anderson

H. A.

Stetkevich

Brown

E. W.

Moideen

Silverman

J. G.

(2012). “Coaching boys into men”: A cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating violence prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(5), 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.018

44.

Mitchum

P. D.,

(2012). Screaming to be heard: Black feminism and the fight for a voice from the 1950s-1970s. Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives, 4(2), 151-170.

45.

Moor

(2007). When recounting the traumatic memories is not enough. Women & Therapy, 30(1–2), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015v30n01_02

46.

Moynihan

M. M.

Banyard

V. L.

Arnold

J. S.

Eckstein

R. P.

Stapleton

J. G.

(2010). Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. Journal of American College Health, 59(3), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.502195

47.

Muller

E. N.

Opp

K.-D.

(1986). Rational choice and rebellious collective action. American Political Science Review, 80(2), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958269

48.

National Collegiate Athletic Association (2020). NCAA demographics database . http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/ncaa-demographics-database

49.

Navarro

J. C.

Tewksbury

(2017). Mythbusters: Examining rape myth acceptance among U.S. University students. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 54(4), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2017.1289094

50.

Oliphant

J. B.

(2017). Sexual harassment allegations reflect “widespread problems,” say women, men. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/07/americans-views-of-sexual-harassment-allegations/

51.

Onwuachi-Willig

(2018). What about #UsToo?: The invisibility of race in the #MeToo movement. Yale Law Journal Forum, 128(1), 105-120.

52.

Orchowski

L. M.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2015). Psychological consequences associated with positive and negative responses to disclosure of sexual assault among college women: A prospective study. Violence Against Women, 21(7), 803-823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215584068

53.

Passy

(2003). Social networks matter. But how? In Diani

McAdam

(Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 21-48). Oxford University Press.

54.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27-68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

55.

Peterson

Z. D.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

(2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51(3/4), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00

56.

Phipps

(2019). “Every woman knows a Weinstein”: Political whiteness and white woundedness in #MeToo and public feminisms around sexual violence. Feminist Formations, 31(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2019.0014

57.

Powers

R. A.

Leili

Hagman

Cohn

(2015). The impact of college education on rape myth acceptance, alcohol expectancies, and bystander attitudes. Deviant Behavior, 36(12), 956-973. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.982747

58.

Rollero

Tartaglia

(2019). The effect of sexism and rape myths on victim blame. Sexuality & Culture, 23(1), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9549-8

59.

Schewe

P. A.

(2002). Guidelines for developing rape prevention and risk reduction interventions. In Schewe

P. A.

(Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 107-136). American Psychological Association.

60.

Schwarzer

Jerusalem

(1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In Weinman

Wright

Johnston

(Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio (pp. 35-37). NFER-Nelson.

61.

Staggenborg

(2015). Social movements (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

62.

Suarez

Gadalla

T. M.

(2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010-2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503

63.

Tambe

(2018). Reckoning with the silences of #MeToo. Feminist Studies, 44(1), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.15767/FEMINISTSTUDIES.44.1.0197

64.

Temkin

Gray

J. M.

Barrett

(2018). Different functions of rape myth use in court: Findings from a trial observation study. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116661627

65.

van Zomeren

Postmes

Spears

(2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

66.

Voller

Polusny

M. A.

Noorbaloochi

Street

Grill

Murdoch

(2015). Self-efficacy, male rape myth acceptance, and devaluation of emotions in sexual trauma sequelae: Findings from a sample of male veterans. Psychological Services, 12(4), 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000046

67.

Vonderhaar

R. L.

Carmody

D. C.

(2014). There are no “innocent victims”: The influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization on rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(10), 1615-1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549196

68.

Weiss

K. G.

(2010). Male sexual victimization: Examining men’s experiences of rape and sexual assault. Men and Masculinities, 12(3), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X08322632

Rape Myth Acceptance and General Self-Efficacy: Gender,Race,and Ethnic Differences of Knowing a Sexual Assault Victim among University Students

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References