The Mediating Role of Moral Absolutism Between the “Binding Moral Foundations” and Sexist Attitudes: A Path That May Lead to Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

The binding foundations (loyalty, authority, and purity) constitute adaptive mechanisms for preserving groups’ interests. However, they have also been related to intergroup prejudice and violence. We show that the known relationship between the binding foundations and sexist attitudes is mediated by moral absolutism, a variable that reflects the degree to which people believe that their own definition of morality is objectively correct. Two different samples are used: a conventional one (Study 1, N = 321), and a forensic one at the beginning (T1) and at the end (T2) of court-mandated psychological therapy (Study 2, N = 354; N = 327).

Keywords

intimate partner violence moral absolutism binding foundations ambivalent sexism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Viki

G. T.

Masser

B. Y.

Bohner

(2003). Perception of a stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025346

Baldner

Pierro

(2019). The trials of women leaders in the workforce: How a need for cognitive closure can influence acceptance of harmful gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 80(9–10), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0953-1

Baumeister

R. F.

(1996). Evil: Inside human cruelty and violence. Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Beauchamp

T. L.

(2001). Philosophical ethics: An Introduction to moral philosophy (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Begany

J. J.

Milburn

M. A.

(2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126.

Brandt

M. J.

Reyna

(2011). The chain of being: A hierarchy of morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(5), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611414587

Christopher

A. N.

Mull

M. S.

(2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230.

Durán

Moya

Megías

J. L.

(2014). Benevolent sexist ideology attributed to an abusive partner decreases women’s active coping responses to acts of sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(8), 1380–1401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513507134

Durán

Rodríguez-Domínguez

(2020). Social perception of situations of sexual cyberviolence: The role of sexist attitudes and the victim’s transgression of gender roles. International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 148–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2019.1682295

10.

Ellemers

Pagliaro

Barreto

(2013). Morality and behavioral regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 160–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2013.841490

11.

Federico

Golec

Dial

J. L.

(2005). The relationship between need for closure and support for military action against Iraq: Moderating effects of national attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 621–632.

12.

Forbes

G. B.

Adams-Curtis

L. E.

White

K. B.

(2004). First-and second-generation measures of sexism, rape myths, and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and association with college students’ experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 10(3), 236–261.

13.

Garaigordobil

Aliri

(2013). Ambivalent sexism inventory: Standardization and normative data in a sample of the Basque Country. Behavioral Psychology, 21(1), 173–186. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259948462

14.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

15.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x

16.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109

17.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414832

18.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2012). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 70–88). Cambridge University Press.

19.

Golec de Zavala

Cislak

A. Y.

Wesolowska

(2010). Political conservatism, need for cognitive closure, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology, 31(1), 521–542.

20.

Gondolf

E. W.

(2011). The weak evidence for batterer program alternatives. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.011

21.

Graham

Haidt

(2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). American Psychological Association.

22.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141

23.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

24.

Haidt

(2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychologica Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

25.

Haidt

(2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. New York Science Journal, 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651

26.

Haidt

(2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x

27.

Haidt

Algoe

(2004). Moral amplification and the emotions that attach us to saints and demons. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 322–335). Guilford Press.

28.

Haidt

Graham

(2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z

29.

Haidt

Graham

Joseph

(2009). Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573

30.

Haidt

Joseph

(2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers S. Laurence S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind volume 3: Foundations and the future (pp. 367–391). Oxford University Press.

31.

Haidt

Kesebir

. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske

Gilbert G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Wiley.

32.

Haidt

Rosenberg

Hom

(2003). Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02071.x

33.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Press.

34.

Heath

(2014). Enlightenment 2.0: Restoring sanity to our politics, our economy, and our lives. HarperCollins.

35.

Herrero

Rodríguez

F. J.

Torres

(2016). Acceptability of partner violence in 51 societies: The role of sexism and attitudes toward violence in social relationships. Violence Against Women, 23(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216642870

36.

Hirschberger

Pyszczynski

(2012). Killing with a clean conscience: Existential angst and the paradox of morality. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 331–347). American Psychological Association.

37.

Juarros-Basterretxea

Overall

N. C.

Herrero

Rodríguez-Díaz

F. J.

(2019). Considering the effect of sexism on psychological intimate partner violence: A study with imprisoned men. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2019a1

38.

Kivikangas

J. M.

Lönnqvist

J.-E.

Ravaja

(2017). Relationship of moral foundations to political liberalism-conservatism and left-right orientation in a Finnish representative sample. Social Psychology, 48(4), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000297

39.

Koleva

S. P.

Graham

Iyer

Ditto

P. H.

Haidt

(2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808

40.

Kugler

Jost

J. T.

Noorbaloochi

(2014). Another Look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5

41.

Lauriola

Foschi

Marchegiani

(2015). Integrating values and cognitive style in a model of right-wing radicalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 75(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.028

42.

Leone

Giacomantonio

Lauriola

(2019). Moral foundations, worldviews, moral absolutism and belief in conspiracy theories. International Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12459

43.

Masser

Viki

G. T.

Power

(2006). Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles, 54(7-8), 565–574.

44.

McGregor

(2006). Offensive defensiveness: Toward an integrative neuroscience of compensatory zeal after mortality salience, personal uncertainty, and other poignant self-threats. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055375.1944-00001-00110.1037/h0055375

45.

McGregor

Zanna

M. P.

Holmes

J. G.

Spencer

S. J.

(2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.472

46.

Mullen

Skitka

L. J.

(2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629

47.

Peterson

Smith

J. A.

Tannenbaum

Shaw

M. P.

(2009). On the “exporting” of morality: Its relation to political conservatism and epistemic motivation. Social Justice Research, 22(2-3), 206–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0101-8

48.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2004). SPSS And SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.

49.

Ruiz

Negredo

Ruiz

García-Moreno

Herrero

Yela

M. Y.

Pérez

(2010). Violencia de Género. Programa de Intervención para Agresores (PRIA). Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias.

50.

Sakalli

(2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44(1), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295109711

51.

Sargent

(2004). Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264481

52.

Sauer

(2015). Can't we all disagree more constructively? Moral foundations, moral reasoning, and political disagreement. Neuroethics, 8(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-015-9235-6

53.

Shaw

Quezada

S. A.

Zárate

M. A.

(2011). Violence with a conscience: Religiosity and moral certainty as predictors of support for violent warfare. Psychology of Violence, 1(4), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025346

54.

Silver

J. R.

Silver

(2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000232

55.

Skitka

L. J.

(2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288003

56.

Skitka

L. J.

(2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1423

57.

Skitka

L. J.

Bauman

C. W.

Sargis

E. G.

(2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895

58.

Skitka

L. J.

Mullen

(2002). The dark side of moral conviction. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 2, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319

59.

Smith

I. H.

Aquino

Koleva

Graham

(2014). The moral ties that bind, …even to out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1554–1562.

60.

Stith

S. M.

McCollum

E. E.

Amanor-Boadu

Smith

(2012). Systemic perspectives on intimate partner violence treatment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00245.x

61.

Stover

C. S.

Meadows

A. L.

Kaufman

(2009). Interventions for intimate partner violence: Review and implications for evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012718

62.

Tagar

M. R.

Morgan

G. S.

Halperin

Skitka

L. J.

(2014). When ideology matters: Moral conviction and the association between ideology and policy preferences in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1993

63.

Trujillo

H. M.

Moyano

León

Valenzuela

C. C.

González-Cabrera

(2005). El radicalismo islamista en las sociedades occidentales: Prejuicio, identidad social y legitimación del terrorismo. Psicología Conductual, 13(1), 311–328.

64.

Vecina

M. L.

(2017). Moral variables before and after a court-mandated psychological treatment of men convicted of violence against their partners: Evolution and relationship with sexist attitudes. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14(3), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1480

65.

Vecina

M. L.

Chacón

Pérez-Viejo

(2016). Moral absolutism, self-deception and moral self-concept in men who commit intimate partner violence: A comparative study with an opposite sample. Violence Against Women, 22(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215597791

66.

Vecina

M. L.

Piñuela

(2017). Relationships between ambivalent sexism and the five moral foundations in men convicted of domestic violence: It is a matter of fairness and authority. The Journal of Psychology, 151(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1289145