Making the Call: College Students’ Legal Consciousness and Hypothetical Activation of Police for Sexual Assaults

Abstract

Research has identified the necessity of sexual assault victims to label their experience as criminal to initiate reporting. However, barriers exist in labeling uninvited sexual contact as criminal. This study examined college students’ assessments of whether eight nonconsensual behaviors met the legal definition of sexual assault, and whether such behaviors should be reported to police. Results indicated students acknowledged the nonconsensual behaviors as criminal; however, gaps were identified between awareness that the acts were criminal and willingness to report to police. Findings demonstrate a need for continued efforts for sexual assault prevention among college students.

Keywords

sexual violence campus sexual assault legal consciousness sexual assault reporting rape

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens

(2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3–4), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9069-9

Anderson

(2014, December 15). Colleges often reluctant to expel for sexual violence—With U-Va. a prime example. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/colleges-often-reluctant-to-expel-for-sexual-violence–with-u-va-a-prime-example/2014/12/15/307c5648-7b4e-11e4-b821-503cc7efed9e_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1d8f8923835e

Barnett

(2012). How newspapers frame rape allegations: The Duke University case. Women & Language, 35(2), 11–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284884848_How_newspapers_frame_rape_allegations_The_Duke_University_case

Blackstone

Uggen

McLaughlin

(2009). Legal consciousness and responses to sexual harassment. Law & Society Review, 43(3), 631–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00384.x

Bondurant

(2001). University women’s acknowledgment of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7, 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801201007003004

Burt

M. R.

(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.

Campbell

Ahrens

Sefl

Wasco

Barnes

(2001). Social reactions to rape victims: Healing and hurtful effects on psychological and physical health outcomes. Violence and Victims, 16(3), 287–302.

Clare

Morgan

(2009). Factors affecting perceived criminality: Evidence from victims of assault. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 376, 1–6. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi376

Cohn

A. M.

Zinzow

H. M.

Resnick

H. S.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

(2013). Correlates of reasons for not reporting rape to police: Results from a national telephone household probability sample of women with forcible or drug-or-alcohol facilitated/incapacitated rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(3), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512455515

10.

Cohn

E. S.

Dupuis

E. C.

Brown

T. M.

(2009). In the eye of the beholder: Do behavior and character affect victim and perpetrator responsibility for acquaintance rape? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(7), 1513–1535.

11.

Daly

Bouhours

(2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis in five countries. Crime and Justice, 39(1), 565–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/653101

12.

DeMatteo

Galloway

Arnold

Patel

(2015). Sexual assault on college campuses: A 50-state survey of criminal sexual assault statutes and their relevance to campus sexual assault. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000055

13.

Dupuis

E. C.

Clay

J. A.

(2013). The role of race and respectability in attributions of responsibility for acquaintance rape. Violence and Victims, 28(6), 1085–1095.

14.

Ewick

Silbey

S. S.

(1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.

15.

Finkelson

Oswalt

(1995). College date rape: Incidence and reporting. Psychological Reports, 77, 526. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.526

16.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2000). The sexual victimization of college women (NCJ 182360, U.S. Department of Justice). U.S. Government Printing Office.

17.

Fisher

B. S.

Daigle

L. E.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802239161

18.

Grubb

A. R.

Harrower

(2009). Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape, and perceived similarity to the victim. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15(1), 63–81.

19.

Hahn

C. K.

Hahn

A. M.

Gaster

Quevillon

(2020). Predictors of college students’ likelihood to report hypothetical rape: Rape myth acceptance, perceived barriers to reporting, and self-efficacy. Ethics & Behavior, 30(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1552519

20.

Harned

M. S.

(2005). Understanding women’s labeling of unwanted sexual experiences with dating partners. Violence Against Women, 11(3), 374–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204272240

21.

Haugen

Stacey

Salter

Phillips

(2018). What makes it rape? A lay theories approach to defining rape among college students. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1398091

22.

Hlavka

(2014). Legal subjectivity among youth victims of sexual abuse. Law & Social Inquiry, 39(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12032

23.

Hockett

Saucier

Badke

(2016). Rape myths, rape scripts, and common rape experiences of college women: Differences in perceptions of women who have been raped. Violence Against Women, 22(3), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215599844

24.

Horvath

Brown

(2009). Rape: Challenging thinking. Willan.

25.

Kahn

A. S.

Mathie

V. A.

Torgler

(1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00296.x

26.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Resnick

H. S.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Conoscenti

L. M.

McCauley

(2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf

27.

Koss

M. P.

(1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14716402.1985.tb00872.x

28.

Koss

M. P.

(1992). The under detection of rape: Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01157.x

29.

Koss

M. P.

(1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626093008002004

30.

Krebs

C. P.

Lindquist

C. H.

Warner

T. D.

Fisher

B. S.

Martin

S. L.

(2007). The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf

31.

Lea

S. J.

(2007). A discursive investigation into victim responsibility in rape. Feminism & Psychology, 17(4), 495–514.

32.

Littleton

H. L.

Axsom

(2003). The rape and seduction scripts of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49(9), 465–475.

33.

Littleton

H. L.

Axsom

Breitkopf

C. R.

Berenson

(2006a). Rape acknowledgment and post-assault experiences: How acknowledgment status relates to disclosure, coping, worldview, and reactions received from others. Violence and Victims, 21(6), 761–778.

34.

Littleton

H. L.

Axsom

Grills-Taquechel

(2009). Sexual assault victims’ acknowledgment status and revictimization risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 34–42.

35.

Littleton

H. L.

Axsom

Yoder

(2006b). Priming of consensual and nonconsensual sexual scripts: An experimental test of the role of scripts in rape attributions. Sex Roles, 54, 557–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9017-z

36.

Littleton

H. L.

Breitkopf

C. R.

Berenson

A. B.

(2008). Beyond the campus: Unacknowledged rape among low income women. Violence Against Women, 14(3), 269–286.

37.

Marshall

Barclay

(2003). In their own words: How ordinary people construct the legal world. Law and Social Inquiry, 28, 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00209.x

38.

McMahon

Farmer

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71

39.

Merry

S. E.

(1990). Getting justice and getting even: Legal consciousness among working-class Americans. University of Chicago Press.

40.

Monroe

L.M.

Kinney

L.M.

Weist

M.D.

Dafeamekpor

D.S.

Dantzler

Reynolds

M.W.

(2005). The Experience of Sexual Assault: Findings From a Statewide Victim Needs Assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(7), 767–776.

41.

Newins

Wilson

White

(2018). Rape myth acceptance and rape acknowledgment: The mediating role of sexual refusal assertiveness. Psychiatry Research, 263, 15–21.

42.

Nielsen

L. B.

(2000). Situating legal consciousness: Experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law and Society Review, 34, 1055–1090. https://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0023-9216%282000%2934%3A4%3C1055%3ASLCEAA%3E2.0

43.

Orchowski

L. M.

Meyer

D. H.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2009). College women’s likelihood to report unwanted sexual experiences to campus agencies: Trends and correlates. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 18(8), 839–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770903291779

44.

Peterson

Z. D.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

(2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144.

45.

Rennison

Rand

(2003). Nonlethal intimate partner violence against women: A comparison of three age cohorts. Violence Against Women, 9(12), 1417–1428.

46.

Ruback

R. B.

Greenberg

M. S.

Westcott

D. R.

(1984). Social influence and crime-victim decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 40(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.184.tb01082.x

47.

Ryan

(2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65, 774–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2

48.

Sabina

L. Y.

(2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 201–226.

49.

Sarat

(1990). “. . . The law is all over”: Power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2(2), 343–379. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol2/iss2/6

50.

Sarat

Kearns

T. R.

(1993). The common place of law. University of Michigan Press.

51.

Sarat

Kearns

T. R.

(1995). Law in everyday life. University of Michigan Press.

52.

Schank

R. C.

Abelson

R. P.

(1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Lawrence Erlbaum.

53.

Seabrook

R. C.

Ward

L. M.

(2019). Bros will be bros? The effect of fraternity membership on perceived culpability for sexual assault. Violence Against Women, 25(12), 1471–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218820196

54.

Shaw

Campbell

Cain

Feeney

(2017). Beyond surveys and scales: How rape myths manifest in sexual assault police records. Psychology of Violence, 7(4), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000072

55.

Sinozich

Langton

(2014). Rape and sexual assault among college-aged females, 1995–2013 (Report No. NCJ 248471). https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf

56.

Spencer

Mallory

Towes

Stith

Wood

(2017). Why sexual assault survivors do not report to universities: A feminist analysis. Family Relations, 66, 166–179.

57.

Spohn

Bjornsen

Wright

(2017). Factors associated with reporting sexual assault among college and non-college women. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 9(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-05-2017-0298

58.

Starzynski

L. L.

Ullman

S. E.

Filipas

H. H.

Townsend

S. M.

(2005). Correlates of women’s sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 20, 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.20.4.417

59.

Suzuki

Y. E.

Bonner

H. S.

(2017). Factors associated with college students’ responses to rape-disclosure scenarios: Influence of gender, rape characteristics, and opinions about health care professionals. Journal of School Violence, 16(2), 160–172.

60.

Thompson

Sitterle

Clay

Kingree

(2007). Reasons for not reporting victimizations to the police: Do they vary for physical and sexual incidents? Journal of American College Health, 55(5), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.5.277-282

61.

Tinkler

J. E.

(2008). “People are too quick to take offense”: The effects of legal information and beliefs on definitions of sexual harassment. Law and Social Inquiry, 33(2), 417–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00108.x

62.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/210346.pdf

63.

Truman

J. L.

Morgan

R. E.

(2016). Criminal victimization, 2015 (NCJ Report no. 250180). Bureau of Justice Studies, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv15.pdf

64.

Tuerkheimer

(2014, January 12). We preach “no means no” for sex, but that’s not what the law says. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/12/rape-definition-use-of-force

65.

Turchik

J. A.

Probst

D. R.

Irvin

C. R.

Chau

Gidycz

C. A.

(2010). Prediction of sexual assault experiences in college women based on rape scripts: A prospective analysis. Psychology of Violence, 1, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/2152-0828.1.S.76

66.

Ullman

S. E.

Filipas

H. H.

(2001). Correlates of formal and informal support seeking in sexual assault victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1028–1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016010004

67.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Violence Against Women. (n.d.). Sexual assault. https://www.justice.gov/ovw/sexual-assault

68.

Walsh

Zinzow

H. M.

Badour

C. L.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Resnick

H. S.

(2016). Understanding disparities in service seeking following forcible versus drug- or alcohol-facilitated/incapacitated rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(14), 2475–2491.

69.

Wilson

L. C.

Miller

K. E.

(2016). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of unacknowledged rape. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015576391

70.

Wolitzky-Taylor

K. B.

Resnick

H. S.

Amstadter

A. B.

McCauley

J. L.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

(2011a). Reporting rape in a national sample of college women. Journal of American College Health, 59(7), 582–587.

71.

Wolitzky-Taylor

K. B.

Resnick

H. S.

McCauley

J. L.

Amstadter

A. B.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Ruggiero

K. J.

(2011b). Is reporting of rape on the rise? A comparison of women with reported versus unreported rape experiences in the National Women’s Study-Replication. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626051036586

72.

Yngvesson

(1993). Virtuous citizens, disruptive subjects: Order and complaint in a New England court. Routledge.

73.

Zinzow

H. M.

Thompson

(2011). Barriers to reporting sexual victimization: Prevalence and correlates among undergraduate women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(7), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.613447