Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The victim’s decision to report a crime is generally dependent on the advice received from a confidant. The effects of a confidant’s relationship to victims and perpetrators on the advice given to report rape were investigated. Indian participants (N = 418) read one of the seven scenarios of acquaintance rape as a confidant; the scenarios depicted different relationships between the victim and perpetrator (family vs. friend vs. stranger). Confidants closer to victims were more likely to advise reporting, whereas confidants closer to the perpetrator were less likely to advise reporting. Rape myth acceptance and victim blaming negatively predicted reporting to agencies.

Keywords

acquaintance rape rape myth acceptance sexual assault social distance victim blaming sexual violence in India reporting of rape to the police rape in India

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Viki

G. T.

Masser

Bohner

(2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111

Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs Union of India and others, Pub. L. No. WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) no. 115 of 2009 (Supreme Court of India Proceedings) 2009. (2009).

Bachman

(1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: New evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854898025001002

Bajoria

(2017). Everyone blames me: Barriers to justice and support services for sexual assault survivors in India. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/11/08/everyone-blames-me/barriers-justice-and-support-services-sexual-assault-survivors

Banyard

V. L.

(2011). Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023739

Basow

Minieri

(2011). “You owe me”: Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(3), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510363421

Ben-David

Schneider

(2005). Rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victim-perpetrator acquaintance. Sex Roles, 53(5–6), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6761-4

Bennett

Banyard

V. L.

Garnhart

(2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505210

Bernhard

Fischbacher

Fehr

(2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442(7105), 912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04981

10.

Black Donald

(1971). The social organisation of arrest. Stanford Law Review, 23, 1087–1111.

11.

Bridges

J. S.

(1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24(5–6), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288303

12.

Burn

S. M.

(2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60(11–12), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5

13.

Campbell

(2008). The psychological impact of rape victims. American Psychologist, 63(8), 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.702

14.

Campbell

Raja

(2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00171.x

15.

Campbell

Sefl

Barnes

H. E.

Ahrens

C. E.

Wasco

S. M.

Zaragoza-Diesfeld

(1999). Community services for rape survivors: Enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.847

16.

Christy

C. A.

Voigt

(1994). Bystander responses to public episodes of child abuse. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(9), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00614.x

17.

Clarke

A. K.

Stermac

(2011). The influence of stereotypical beliefs, participant gender, and survivor weight on sexual assault response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2285–2302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510383039

18.

Cohn

E. S.

Dupuis

E. C.

Brown

T. M.

(2009). In the eye of the beholder: Do behavior and character affect victim and perpetrator responsibility for acquaintance rape? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(7), 1513–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00493.x

19.

Crowne

D. P.

Marlowe

(1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358

20.

Dukes

R. L.

Mattley

C. L.

(1977). Predicting rape victim reportage. Sociology & Social Research 6 2(1), 63–84.

21.

Eifler

Petzold

(2019). Validity aspects of vignette experiments: Expected “what-if” differences between reports of behavioral intentions and actual behavior. In Lavrakas

Traugott

Kennedy

Holbrook

de Leeuww

West

, B (Eds.), Experimental methods in survey research: Techniques that combine random sampling with random assignment (pp. 393–416). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119083771.ch20

22.

Felson

R. B.

Paré

(2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00156.x

23.

Freetly

A. J. H.

Kane

E. W.

(1995). Men’s and women’s perceptions of non-consensual sexual intercourse. Sex Roles, 33(11–12), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544779

24.

Frese

Moya

Megías

J. L.

(2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503260245

25.

Gartner

Macmillan

(1995). The effect of victim-offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 393–429. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.37.3.393

26.

Goette

Huffman

Meier

(2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review, 96(2), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806777211658

27.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Gottfredson

D. M.

(1987). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.

28.

Gravelin

C. R.

Biernat

Bucher

C. E.

(2019). Blaming the victim of acquaintance rape: Individual, situational, and sociocultural factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02422

29.

Greenberg

M. S.

Ruback

R. B.

(1985). A model of crime victim decision making. Victimology, 10(1–4), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3334-4

30.

Greenberg

M. S.

Ruback

R. B.

(1992). Self-reports. In Greenberg

M. S.

Ruback

R. B.

(Eds.), After the crime: Perspectives in law & psychology (pp. 151–179). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3334-4_8

31.

Gutek

B. A.

(1985). Sex and the workplace. Jossey-Bass.

32.

Hammond

E. M.

Berry

M. A.

Rodriguez

D. N.

(2011). The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X499887

33.

Kamdar

Z. N.

Kosambiya

J. K.

Chawada

B. L.

Verma

Kadia

(2017). Rape: Is it a lifestyle or behavioral problem? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 59(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_78_16

34.

Kennedy

A. C.

Prock

K. A.

(2016). “I still feel like I am not normal”: A review of the role of stigma and stigmatization among female survivors of Child Sexual Abuse, Sexual Assault, and Intimate Partner Violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19, 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016673601

35.

Kishor

Gupta

(2005). National family health survey: Gender equality and women’s empowerment in India. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Government of India.

36.

Klement

K. R.

Sagarin

B. J.

Skowronski

J. J.

(2019). Accusers lie and other myths: Rape myth acceptance predicts judgments made about accusers and accused perpetrators in a rape case. Sex Roles, 81(1–2), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0950-4

37.

Knoth

L. K.

Ruback

R. B.

(2016). Reporting crimes to the police depends on relationship networks: Effects of ties among victims, advisors, and offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 2749–2773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516662848

38.

Krahé

(1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00004.x

39.

Levine

Cassidy

Brazier

Reicher

(2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(7), 1452–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x

40.

Logan

T. K.

Evans

Stevenson

Jordan

C. E.

(2005). Barriers to services for rural and urban survivors of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 591–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504272899

41.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1994). Rape myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x

42.

Mason

G. E.

Riger

Foley

L. a

. (2004). The impact of past sexual experiences on attributions of responsibility for rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(10), 1157–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269094

43.

Masser

Lee

McKimmie

B. M.

(2010). Bad woman, bad victim? Disentangling the effects of victim stereotypicality, gender stereotypicality and benevolent sexism on acquaintance rape victim blame. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y

44.

Monson

C. M.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

Binderup

(2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”? Attributions about date and marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(11), 1156–1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626000015011003

45.

Moore

B. M.

Baker

(2018). An exploratory examination of college students’ likelihood of reporting sexual assault to police and university officials: Results of a self-report survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3419–3438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516632357

46.

Nalla

M. K.

Madan

(2012). Determinants of citizens’ perceptions of police-community cooperation in India: Implications for community policing. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-011-9110-2

47.

National Crime Records Bureau. (2016). Crime in India 2016.

48.

National Crime Records Bureau. (2019). Crime in India 2019.

49.

Nicksa

S. C.

(2014). Bystander’s willingness to report theft, physical assault, and sexual assault: The impact of gender, anonymity, and relationship with the offender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505146

50.

Ogletree

S. M.

Archer

R. L.

(2011). Interpersonal judgments: Moral responsibility and blame. Ethics & Behavior, 21(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.537569

51.

Palermo

Bleck

Peterman

(2013). Tip of the iceberg: Reporting and gender-based violence in developing countries. American Journal of Epidemiology, 179(5), 602–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt295

52.

Palmer

J. E.

Nicksa

S. C.

McMahon

(2018). Does who you know affect how you act? The impact of relationships on bystander intervention in interpersonal violence situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(17), 2623–2642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516628292

53.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

54.

Press Trust of India. (2020, March 20). Post-Nirbhaya changes in laws not yielded results due to poor implementation, say experts. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/post-nirbhaya-changes-in-laws-not-yielded-results-due-to-poor-implementation-say-experts-1657772-2020-03-20

55.

Reips

U.-D.

(2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49(4), Article 243. https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243

56.

Rennison

C. M.

(2002). Rape and sexual assault: Reporting to police and medical attention, 1992-2000. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

57.

Rotundo

Nguyen

D.-H.

Sackett

P. R.

(2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914

58.

Ruback

R. B.

Thompson

M. P.

(2001). Social and psychological consequences of violent victimization. Sage.

59.

Sable

M. R.

Danis

Mauzy

D. L.

Gallagher

S. K.

(2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162

60.

Schwartz

M. D.

Leggett

M. S.

(1999). Bad dates or emotional trauma? Violence Against Women, 5(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778019922181211

61.

Shearn

Spellman

Straley

Meirick

Stryker

(1999). Empathic blushing in friends and strangers. Motivation and Emotion, 23(4), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021342910378

62.

Sleed

Durrheim

Kriel

Solomon

Baxter

(2002). The effectiveness of the vignette methodology: A comparison of written and video vignettes in eliciting responses about date rape. South African Journal of Psychology, 32(3), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630203200304

63.

Solórzano

B. H.

(2007). A comprehensive review of the influences on reporting of sexual assaults. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 225–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00354_10.x

64.

Suarez

Gadalla

T. M.

(2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503

65.

Ullman

S. E.

Filipas

H. H.

(2001). Correlates of formal and informal support seeking in sexual assault victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(10), 1028–1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016010004

66.

Walsh

R. M.

Bruce

S. E.

(2014). Reporting decisions after sexual assault: The impact of mental health variables. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(6), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036592

67.

Williams

L. S.

(1984). The classic rape: When do victims report? Social Problems, 31(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1984.31.4.03a00070

68.

Wolitzky-Taylor

K. B.

Resnick

H. S.

McCauley

J. L.

Amstadter

A. B.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Ruggiero

K. J.

(2011). Is reporting of rape on the rise? A comparison of women with reported versus unreported rape experiences in the national women’s study-replication. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(4), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510365869

69.

Xie

Baumer

E. P.

(2019). Crime victims’ decisions to call the police: Past research and new directions. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024748

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Who Are You to Me? Relational Distance to Victims and Perpetrators Affects Advising to Report Rape

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material