This article analyzes contradictory practices carried out in Kyrgyzstani crisis centers for victims of gender violence resulting in women-clients failing to obtain the protection they seek. These problematic dynamics are shaped by a global apparatus on women’s human rights protection and international standards of practice. Crisis center professionals perform the final activation of this ruling apparatus through textual work driven not by the women’s needs but by the goal of bringing local actions into accord with the “legal framework” organized and expressed by the national anti-violence law and the government’s need to report on it to international treaty bodies.
BlagojevichM. (2010). Non-“White” whites, non-European Europeans, and gendered non-citizens: On a possible epistemic strategy from the semiperiphery of Europe. In YoungB.ScherrerC. (Eds.), Gender knowledge and knowledge networks in international political economy (pp. 183–198). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
2.
ÇağlarG. (2010). Multiple meanings of gender budgeting: Gender knowledge and economic knowledge in the World Bank and UNDP. In YoungB.ScherrerC. (Eds.), Gender knowledge and knowledge networks in international political economy (pp. 55–75). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
3.
ChildressS.PanchanadeswaranS.JoshiM. (2021). Leaving and beyond: Voices of survivors of domestic violence from Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3–4), 1718–1744.https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517743550
4.
CleuziouJ.DirenbergerL. (2016). Gender and nation in post-Soviet Central Asia: From national narratives to women’s practices. Nationalities Papers, 44(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1082997
5.
CookeB.KothariU. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?ZED Books.
Corcoran-NantesY. (2005). Lost voices: Central Asian women confronting transition. ZED Books.
8.
CornwallA.RivasA.-M. (2015). From “gender equality” and “women’s empowerment” to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1013341
Féaux de la CroixJ. (2013). How to build a better future? Kyrgyzstani development workers and the “knowledge transfer” strategy. Central Asian Survey, 32(4), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2013.862964
11.
HoareJ. P. (2016). Doing gender activism in a donor-organized framework: Constraints and opportunities in Kyrgyzstan. Nationalities Papers, 44(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1007344
KimE.CampbellM. (2013). Violence against women and peace building: Tracking ruling relations in women’s development NGO in Kyrgyzstan. In ChoudryA.KapoorD. (Eds.), NGO-ization: Complicity, contradictions and prospects (pp. 185–206). ZED Books.
14.
KuehnastK.NechemiasC. (2004). Post-Soviet women encountering transition: Nation building, economic survival, and civic activism. Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Kyrgyz Government. (2007, August20). National plan of action for achieving gender equality of the Kyrgyz Republic [NAP], 2007-2010: Presidential decree 369. http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/62678
16.
ManjooR. (2010). Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences (A/HRC/14/22/Add.2). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/684457?ln=en
17.
MasseyD. (1996). The age of extremes: Concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty first century. Demography (, 33, 4395–4412.
National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic, Ministry of Health [Kyrgyz Republic], & ICF International. (2013). Kyrgyz republic demographic and health survey 2012. NSC, MOH, and ICF International.
OzcanG. B. (2006). Djamila’s journey from kolkhoz to bazaar: Female entrepreneurs in Kyrgyzstan. In WelterF. (Ed.), Enterprising women in transition economies (pp. 93–115). Ashgate.
25.
PenceE. (2001). Safety for battered women in a textually mediated legal system. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 7, 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245280108523558
26.
SimpsonM. (2009). Local strategies in globalizing gender politics: A study of women’s organizing and aid in contemporary Kyrgyzstan [Doctoral dissertation]. Central European University.
27.
SladeB. L. (2008). From high skill to high school: The social organization of—Canadian work experience for immigrant professionals [Doctoral dissertation]. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
28.
SmithD. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. University of Toronto Press.
29.
SmithD. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. AltaMira Press/Rowman & Littlefield.
30.
The Break-through. (2002). The handbook. Unpublished internal document.
United Nations Commission on Human Rights. (1996, February2). Report of the special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Radhika Coomaraswamy, submitted in accordance with Commission on Human Rights resolution 1995/85. A framework for model legislation on domestic violence (E/CN.4/1996/53/Add.2). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G96/104/75/PDF/G9610475.pdf?OpenElement
34.
United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (1992). CEDAW general recommendation no. 19: Violence against women. https://www.refworld.org/docid/52d920c54.html
