The current research aimed to investigate justifications behind the perception of stealthing—the act of nonconsensual condom removal in previously consented intercourse. Based upon an article by Brodsky that conducted real-life interviews of stealthing activities, justifications for the act were experimentally manipulated after the participants read a scenario involving a depiction of stealthing. A four (Justification: Control, Instinct, Right, Pleasure) × two (Participant Gender: female, male) multivariate analysis on the assessment of various criminality, morality, harm, blame/responsibility items yielded a significant difference in terms of rape determination, but not other criminality measures. Implications for future research are discussed.
AcockA. C.IrelandN. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9(2), 179–193.
2.
Ben-DavidS.SchneiderO. (2005). Rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victim-perpetrator acquaintance. Sex Roles, 53(5–6), 385–399.
3.
BoudreauxE.KilpatrickG.ResnickH. S.BestC. L.SaundersB. E. (1998). Criminal victimization, posttraumatic stress disorder, and comorbid psychopathology among a community sample of women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11(4), 665–678.
4.
BowlegL.LucasK. J.TschannJ. M. (2004). “The ball was always in his court”: An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(1), 70–82.
5.
BridgesJ. S. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24(5–6), 291–307.
6.
BrodskyA. (2017). Rape-adjacent: Imagining legal responses to nonconsensual condom removal. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 32, 183.
7.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
CheckJ. V.MalamuthN. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 344–356.
10.
CollerS. A.ResickP. A. (1987). Women’s attributions of responsibility for date rape: The influence of empathy and sex-role stereotyping. Violence and Victims, 2(2), 115.
11.
Du MontJ.MillerK. L.MyhrT. L. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9(4), 466–486.
12.
GaveyN. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. Routledge.
13.
GrubbA.HarrowerJ. (2008). Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(5), 396–405.
14.
HildebrandM. M.NajdowskiC. J. (2014). The potential impact of rape culture on juror decision making: Implications for wrongful acquittals in sexual assault trials. Albany Law Review, 78, 1059.
15.
KahnA. S.JacksonJ.KullyC.BadgerK.HalvorsenJ. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(3), 233–242.
16.
KennedyS. B.NolenS.ApplewhiteJ.WaiterE. (2007). Urban African-American males’ perceptions of condom use, gender and power, and HIV/STD prevention program. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99(12), 1395–1401.
17.
KrahéB. (1998). Sexual aggression among adolescents: Prevalence and predictors in a German sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 537–554.
18.
LyonM. R. (2004). No means no? Withdrawal of consent during intercourse and the continuing evolution of the definition of rape. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95(1), 277–314.
19.
PerkoniggA.KesslerR. C.StorzS.WittchenH. U. (2000). Traumatic events and post-traumatic stress disorder in the community: Prevalence, risk factors and comorbidity. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101(1), 46–59.
20.
PleckJ. H.SonensteinF. L.KuL. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 11–29.
21.
PurdieM. P.AbbeyA.Jacques-TiuraA. J. (2010). Perpetrators of intimate partner sexual violence: Are there unique characteristics associated with making partners have sex without a condom?Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1086–1097.
RyanK. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12(2), 237–245.
24.
StarfeltL. C.WhiteK. M. (2015). The influence of perpetrator and victim intoxication on perceivers’ ratings of a sexual perpetrator’s own awareness of wrongdoing for his sexually aggressive behaviour. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(2), 209–223.
Van WieV. E.GrossA. M.MarxB. P. (1995). Females’ perception of date rape: An examination of two contextual variables. Violence Against Women, 1(4), 351–365.
27.
WhatleyM. A. (1996). Victim characteristics influencing attributions of responsibility to rape victims: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1(2), 81–95.
28.
WoodL. A.RennieH. (1994). Formulating rape: The discursive construction of victims and villains. Discourse & Society, 5(1), 125–148.
29.
WorkmanJ. E.FreeburgE. W. (1999). An examination of date rape, victim dress, and perceiver variables within the context of attribution theory. Sex Roles, 41(3–4), 261–277.
