This study analyzes whether the degree of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation influence the blame placed on a woman who is the victim of an acquaintance rape. The participants read a rape scenario and responded to three questionnaires about the blame of the victim, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance. The results show that greater blame was attributed to the victim when the participants scored high in right-wing authoritarianism or social dominance. They also reveal an interaction between both variables: participants who scored high in both right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance attributed the greatest blame to the victim.
AbramsD.VikiG.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.
2.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.
3.
AhrensC. E.CampbellR.Ternier-ThamesN. K.WascoS. M.SeflT. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38–49.
4.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
5.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
6.
AltemeyerB. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass.
7.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
8.
AltemeyerB., (1998). The other “Authoritarian Personality.” In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). Academic Press.
9.
AltemeyerB. (2004). Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 421–447.
10.
AndersonK. B.CooperH.OkamuraL. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 295–315.
11.
AosvedA. C.LongP. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481–492.
12.
AsbrockF.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324–340.
13.
BobbioN. (1996). El futuro de la democracia [Future of democracy]. FCE.
14.
BohnerG.ReinhardM. A.RutzS.SturmS.KerschbaumB.EfflerD. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men’s self-reported reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257–268.
15.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Simon and Schuster.
16.
BurtR. M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports of rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.
17.
CalhounK. S.TownsleyR. M. (1991). Attributions of responsibility for acquaintance. In ParrotA.BechhoferL. (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 57–69). John Wiley.
18.
CantoJ. M. (2005). Tipo de racismo e ideología política [Type of racism and political ideology]. In RomayJ.García-MiraR. (Eds.), Psicología social y problemas sociales [Social psychology and social issues] (pp. 163–170). Biblioteca Nueva.
19.
CantoJ. M.PerlesF.San MartínJ. (2014). The role of right-wing authoritarianism, sexism and culture of honour on rape myths acceptance. International Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 296–318.
20.
CantoJ. M.San MartínJ.PerlesF. (2018). Exploring the role of the aggressor’s social class in rape and its relation to right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518805095
21.
ChristopherA.MullM. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 223–230.
22.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual process cognitive motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Academic Press.
23.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects or right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
24.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.
25.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1893.
26.
DuriezB.Van HielA. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213.
27.
DuriezB.Van HielA.KossowskaM. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26, 299–320.
28.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes towards immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 473–489.
29.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–73.
30.
FeldmanS.JohnstoneC. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology. Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 335–358.
31.
FerrãoM. C.GonçalvesG. (2015). Rape crimes reviewed: The role of observed variables in female victim blaming. Psychological Thought, 8, 47–67.
32.
GergerH.KleyH.BohnerG.SieblerF. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440.
33.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism lnventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
34.
HockettJ. M.SaucierD. A.HoffmanB. H.SmithS. J.CraigA. W. (2009). Oppression through acceptance? Predicting rape myth acceptance and attitudes toward victims. Violence Against Women, 8, 877–897.
35.
HodsonG.DhontK. (2016). The person-based nature of prejudice. Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. In HewstoneM.MansteadA. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–42). Taylor & Francis.
36.
JostJ.FedericoC.NapierJ. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
37.
KreindlerS. A. (2005). A dual group process model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 90–107.
38.
LippaR.AradS. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463–493.
39.
LonswayK. A.FitzgerardL. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.
40.
Manganelli-RattazziA. M.BobbioA.CanovaL. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1223–1234.
41.
MilhaussenR.HeroldE. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368.
42.
Núñez-AlarcónM.Moreno-JiménezP.Moral-ToranzoF. (2011). Modelo causal del prejuicio religioso [Causal model of religious prejudice]. Anales de Psicología, 27, 852–861.
43.
PassiniS. (2008). Exploring the multidimensional facets of authoritarianism: Authoritarian aggression and social dominance orientation. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 51–60.
44.
PassiniS. (2015). Different ways of being authoritarian: The distinct effects of authoritarian dimensions on values and prejudice. Political Psychology, 38, 73–86.
45.
PayneD.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.
46.
PetersonZ. D.MuehlenhardC. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definition of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144.
47.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
48.
SchwartzS. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical test in 20 countries. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press.
49.
SibleyC. G.OverallN. C. (2012). A dual process motivational model of ambivalent sexism and gender differences in romantic partner preferences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 303–317.
50.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM.DuckittJ. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 33, 160–172.
51.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
52.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.BoboL. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490.
53.
Silva-FerreroM. P.BustillosA. (2007). Validación de la Escala de Dominancia Social al castellano castellano [Validation of the Social Domination Orientation Scale to Spanish]. International Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3–13.
54.
StellmacherJ.PetzelT. (2005). Authoritarianism as a group phenomenon. Political Psychology, 26, 245–273.
55.
StephanW. G.RenfroC. L. (2003). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup relations: Different reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). Psychology Press.
56.
SüssenbachP.BohnerG. (2011). Acceptance of sexual aggression myths in a representative sample of German residents. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 374–385.
57.
SüssenbachP.EysselF.ReesJ.BohnerG. (2017). Looking for blame: Rape myth acceptance and attention to victim and perpetrator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37, 2323–2344.
58.
Van HielA.MervieldeI. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965–976.
59.
VikiG.AbramsD. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.
60.
WhitleyB. E.Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134.
