The widespread use of social networks has turned cyber violence into a serious problem. We performed a survey with 1,468 adolescents aged 13-17 years and found that almost one in four frequently observed different forms of cyber violence against women and girls. More than a third of the adolescents who witnessed the violence did nothing, and while girls gave more active responses to help the victim, both girls and boys normalized and even justified this behavior. Our findings also underline how little is known about institutional resources for victims. We also discuss the implications for awareness and prevention.
Álvarez-GarcíaD.Barreiro-CollazoA.NúñezJ. C. (2017). Cyberaggression among adolescents: Prevalence and gender differences. Comunicar, 50, 89-97. doi:10.3916/C50-2017-08
2.
BarlińskaJ.SzusterA.WiniewskiM. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 37-51. doi:10.1002/casp.2137
3.
Blanco-RuizM. A. (2014). Implicaciones del uso de las redes sociales en el aumento de la violencia de género en adolescentes [Implications of the use of social networks in the increase of gender violence in teenagers]. Comunicación y Medios, 30, 124-141.
4.
BorrajoE.Gámez-GuadixM.CalveteE. (2015). Justification beliefs of violence, myths about love and cyber dating abuse. Psicothema, 27, 327-333. doi:10.7334/psicothema2015.59
5.
BrochadoS.SoaresS.FragaS. (2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 523-531. doi:10.1177/1524838016641668
6.
CaseyE.LindhorstT.StorerH. (2017). The situational-cognitive model of adolescent bystander behavior: Modeling bystander decision-making in the context of bullying and teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 7, 33-44. doi:10.1037/vio0000033
7.
CleemputK.VandeboschH.PabianS. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 383-396. doi:10.1002/ab.21534
8.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London, England: Sage.
9.
Donoso-VázquezT.Rubio HurtadoM. J.Vilà BañosR. (2017). Las ciberagresiones en función del género [Cyberviolence & gender-related indicators]. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35, 197-214. doi:10.6018/rie.35.1.249771
10.
Donoso-VázquezT.Rubio HurtadoM. J.Vilà BañosR. (2018). La adolescencia ante la violencia de género 2.0: Concepciones, conductas y experiencias [Adolescence and gender violence 2.0: concepts, behaviors and experiences]. Educación XX1, 21, 109-134. doi:10.5944/educxx1.20180
11.
DunnS.LalondeJ. S.BaileyJ. (2017). Terms of silence: Weaknesses in corporate and law enforcement responses to cyberviolence against girls. Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 80-96. doi:10.3167/ghs.2017.100207
12.
EstébanezI. (2018). La ciberviolencia hacia las adolescentes en las redes sociales [Cyberviolence against girls in social networks]. Sevilla, Spain: Instituto Andaluz de la Mujer. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/hC8s6P
13.
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2017). Cyber violence against women and girls. Vilnius, Lithuania: EIGE. doi:10.2839/270174
14.
Fernández-ZurbaránP. (2018). Guía para profesionales ante chicas adolescentes que sufren violencia de género: saber mirar, saber acoger, saber acompañar [Guide for professionals with adolescent girls who suffer gender violence: knowing how to look, knowing how to welcome, knowing how to accompany]. Sevilla, Spain: Instituto Andaluz de la Mujer. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/xQAQP7
15.
Ferrer-PérezV. A.Bosch-FiolE. (2013). Del amor romántico a la violencia de género: Para una coeducación emocional en la agenda educativa[From romantic love to gender violence. For an emotional coeducation in the educational agenda]. Profesorado: Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 17, 105-122.
16.
GaraigordobilM. (2017). Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying test, a screening instrument to measure cybervictimization, cyberaggression, and cyberobservation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3556-3576. doi:10.1177/0886260515600165
17.
HenryN.PowellA. (2015). Embodied harms: Gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 21, 758-779. doi:10.1177/1077801215576581
18.
HolfeldB.GrabeM. (2012). Middle school students’ perceptions of and responses to cyber bullying. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46, 395-413. doi:10.2190/EC.46.4.e
19.
HusnuS.MertanB. E. (2017). The roles of traditional gender myths and beliefs about beating on self-reported partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3735-3752. doi:10.1177/0886260515600879
20.
KowalskiR.GiumettiG.SchroederA.LattannerM. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073-1137. doi:10.1037/a0035618
21.
MachakovaH.DedkovaL.SevcikovaA.CernaA. (2018). Bystanders’ supportive and passive responses to cyberaggression. Journal of School Violence, 17, 99-110. doi:10.1080/15388220.2016.1222499
22.
Martín-MontillaA.Pazos-GómezM.Montilla-CoronadoM. V.Romero-OlivaC. (2016). Una modalidad actual de violencia de género en parejas de jóvenes: Las redes sociales [Current mode of gender violence in couples of young people: social networks]. Educación XX1, 19, 405-429.
23.
MayohJ.OnwuegbuzieA. (2013). Toward a conceptualization of mixed methods phenomenological research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9, 91-107. doi:10.1177/1558689813505358
24.
McMahonS.PalmerJ. E.BanyardV.MurphyM.GidyczC. A. (2017). Measuring bystander behavior in the context of sexual violence prevention: Lessons learned and new directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2396-2418. doi:10.1177/0886260515591979
25.
Nardi-RodríguezA.Pastor-MiraM. A.López-RoigS.Ferrer-PérezV. A. (2017). What are the most representative warning signs of intimate partner violence against adolescent girls?Anales de Psicología, 33, 376-382. doi:10.6018/analesps.33.2.256971
26.
Olenik-ShemeshD.HeimanT.EdenS. (2017). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal-socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 23-48. doi:10.1177/0886260515585531
27.
PattonD. U.HongJ. S.PatelS.KrallM. J. (2017). A systematic review of research strategies used in qualitative studies on school bullying and victimization. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 3-16. doi:10.1177/1524838015588502
28.
PowersR.LeiliJ. (2018). Bar training for active bystanders: Evaluation of a community-based bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 24, 1614-1634. doi:10.1177/1077801217741219
29.
Rebollo-CatalánA.Mayor-BuzonV.Vico-BoschA. (2018). La otra cara de la luna: la violencia invisible contra las mujeres en las redes sociales [The hidden face of the moon: invisible violence against women in social networks]. In Donoso-VázquezT.Rebollo-CatalánA. (Coords.), Violencias de Género en Entornos Virtuales (pp. 105-120). Barcelona, Spain: Octaedro.
30.
Ruiz-RepulloC. (2016). Voces tras los datos: Una mirada cualitativa a la violencia de género en adolescentes [Voices behind the data: a qualitative view of gender violence in adolescents]. Sevilla, Spain: Instituto Andaluz de la Mujer. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/XAvjJk
31.
SongJ.OhI. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273-282. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008
32.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
TandonN.PritchardS. (2015). Cyberviolence against women and girl: A world-wide wake-up call. New York: United Nations Broadband Commission for Digital Development. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/pKn5tc
34.
TashakkoriA.TeddieC. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
TaylorS.CalkinsC. A.XiaY.DallaR. L. (2017). Adolescent perceptions of dating violence: A qualitative study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0886260517726969
36.
VallésM. S. (1997). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación Social: Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional [Qualitative techniques in social research: methodological reflection and professional practice]. Madrid, Spain: Síntesis Sociológica.
37.
VilàR.DonosoT.RubioM. J.PradoN.VelascoA.ArrazolaJ.MartínezS. (2015). Cuestionario de Violencias de Género 2.0 [Gender Violence 2.0 Questionnaire]. Dipòsit Digital, Universidad de Barcelona. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/8LVRa5
38.
WeitzmanA.CowanS.WalshK. (2020). Bystander interventions on behalf of sexual assault and intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35, 1694-1718. doi:10.1177/0886260517696873
39.
WestJ. (2014). Cyber-violence against women. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Battered Women Support Services. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/nkqwtS
40.
WoodlockD. (2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23, 584-602. doi:10.1177/1077801216646277
41.
YoungR.Len-RíosM.YoungH. (2017). Romantic motivations for social media use, social comparison, and online aggression among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 385-395. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.021
