Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-10
The Green Light for Green Dot: A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Adoption of an Efficacious Violence Prevention Program in High School Settings
The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate factors influencing the adoption of an effective bystander-based sexual violence prevention intervention. High schools participating in a cluster-randomized controlled trial that found significant declines in sexual violence over time and with full implementation were invited to adopt this program (Green Dot) at no cost. Three emergent themes arose from interviews with 10 intervention implementers. These findings have implications for researchers, practitioners, and high school administrators and may facilitate future program marketing efforts and the development and testing of strategies for targeted dissemination of this and other bystander programs for violence.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463-481. doi:10.1002/jcop.20159
2.
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2005). Rape prevention through bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
BasileK. C. (2015). A comprehensive approach to sexual violence prevention. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2350-2352. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1503952
4.
BauerM. S.DamschroderL.HagedornH.SmithJ.KilbourneA. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3(1), Article 32.
5.
BerkowitzA. D. (2002). Fostering men’s responsibility for preventing sexual assault. In ScheweP. A. (Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships (pp. 163-196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
7.
BradshawC.AtkinsonS.DoodyO. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 2333393617742282.
8.
BradshawC. P. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. American Psychologist, 70, 322-332. doi:10.1037/a0039114
CokerA. L.BushH. M.Cook-CraigP. G.DeGueS. A.ClearE. R.BrancatoC. J.RecktenwaldE. A. (2017). RCT testing bystander effectiveness to reduce violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52, 566-578. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020
11.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.FisherB. S.SwanS. C.WilliamsC. M.ClearE. R.DeGueS. (2016). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50, 295-302. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034
12.
CokerA. L.Cook-CraigP. G.WilliamsC. M.FisherB. S.ClearE. R.GarciaL. S.HeggeL. M. (2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17, 777-796. doi:10.1177/1077801211410264
13.
CokerA. L.FisherB. S.BushH. M.SwanS. C.WilliamsC. M.ClearE. R.DeGueS. (2015). Evaluation of the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21, 1507-1527. doi:10.1177/1077801214545284
14.
Cook-CraigP. G.CokerA. L.ClearE. R.GarciaL. S.BushH. M.BrancatoC. J.FisherB. S. (2014). Challenge and opportunity in evaluating a diffusion-based active bystanding prevention program: Green Dot in high schools. Violence Against Women, 20, 1179-1202. doi:10.1177/1077801214551288
15.
Cook-CraigP. G.MillspaughP. H.RecktenwaldE. A.KellyN. C.HeggeL. M.CokerA. L.PletcherT. S. (2014). From empower to Green Dot: Successful strategies and lessons learned in developing comprehensive sexual violence primary prevention programming. Violence Against Women, 20, 1162-1178. doi:10.1177/1077801214551286
16.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124-130.
17.
DeGueS.ValleS. A.HoltM. K.MassettiG. M.MatjaskoJ. L.TharpA. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 346-364. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004
18.
DoodyO.NoonanM. (2013). Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data. Nurse Researcher, 20(5), 28-32.
19.
FaganA. A.MihalicS. (2003). Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school-based prevention programs: Lessons learned from the Blueprints for Violence Prevention replications of the Life Skills Training program. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 235-253. doi:10.1002/jcop.10045
20.
FlayB. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451-474. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/preventive-medicine/
21.
FrambachR. T.SchillewaertN. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 163-176. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1
22.
GlasgowR. E.EmmonsK. M. (2007). How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 413-433.
23.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M.NameyE. E. (2012). Validity and reliability (credibility and dependability) in qualitative research and data analysis. In GuestG.NameyE. E.MacQueenK. M. (Eds.), Applied thematic analysis (pp. 79-106). London, England: Sage.
24.
HsiehH.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-128821. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
25.
LeeD. S.GuyL.PerryB.SniffenC. K.MixsonS. A. (2007). Sexual violence prevention. The Prevention Researcher, 14(2), 15-20. Retrieved from https://www.tpronline.org/
26.
LonswayB. V.BerkowitzA. D.GidyezC. A.KatzJ. T.RossM. P.ScheweP. A.EdwardsD. (2009). Rape prevention and risk reduction: Review of the research literature for practitioners. VAWnet, 1, 1-20. Available from http://vawnet.org/
27.
LundgrenR.AminA. (2015). Addressing intimate partner violence and sexual violence among adolescents: Emerging evidence of effectiveness. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 42-50. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.012
28.
MorrisonS.HardisonJ.MatthewA.O’NeilJ. (2004). An evidence-based review of sexual assault preventive intervention programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
29.
NoonanR. K.EmshoffJ. G.MoossA.ArmstrongM.WeinbergJ.BallB. (2009). Adoption, adaptation, and fidelity of implementation of sexual violence prevention programs. Health Promotion Practice, 10(Suppl. 1), 59S-70S. doi:10.1177/1524839908329374
30.
PalinkasL. A.HorwitzS. M.GreenC. A.WisdomJ. P.DuanN.HoagwoodK. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533-544. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
31.
RibislK. M.LeemanJ.GlasserA. M. (2014). Pricing health behavior interventions to promote adoption: Lessons from the marketing and business literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46, 653-659.
32.
RogersE. M. (2002). Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 989-993.
33.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
34.
RohrbachL. A.RingwaitC. L.EnnettS. T.VincusA. A. (2005). Factors associated with adoption of evidence-based substance use prevention curricula in US school districts. Health Education Research, 20, 514-526. doi:10.1093/her/cyh008
35.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
SandelowskiM. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179-183. doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211
37.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334-340.
38.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. doi:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
