The Lethality Assessment Program (LAP) aims to empower law enforcement officers to screen victims of domestic violence for potential lethality and connect them to service providers. This research surveyed domestic violence victims seeking legal services (n = 141) to assess whether LAP receipt is associated with greater rates of self-protective measures, service use, or empowerment, and to examine victims’ perspectives on the LAP process. Findings indicate no relationship between receipt of the LAP and use of self-protective measures or victim empowerment, mixed evidence between receipt of the LAP and service utilization, and room for improvement regarding how law enforcement officers explain the LAP to victims. Implications are discussed.
BirdsallN.KirbyS.McManusM. (2017). Police-victim engagement in building a victim empowerment approach to intimate partner violence cases. Police Practice & Research, 18, 75-86.
2.
CampbellJ. C. (1986). Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with battered women. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 36-51.
3.
CampbellJ. C. (1995). Assessing dangerousness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
CampbellJ. C. (2004). Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1464-1477.
5.
CampbellJ. C. (2005). Commentary on Websdale: Lethality assessment approaches: Reflections on their use and ways forward. Violence Against Women, 11, 1206-1213.
6.
CanalesD.MacaulayA.McDougallA.WeiR.CampbellM. A. (2013). A brief synopsis of risk assessment screening tools for frontline professionals responding to intimate partner violence. Fredericton, Canada: Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of New Brunswick.
7.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A. (2010). Through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence: The relationship between empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 481-502.
8.
Connor-SmithJ. K.HenningK.MooreS.HoldfordR. (2011). Risk assessments by female victims of intimate partner violence: Predictors of risk perceptions and comparison to actuarial measure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2517-2550.
9.
CurnowS. A. (1997). The open window phase: Helpseeking and reality behaviors by battered women. Applied Nursing Research, 10, 128-135.
10.
DuttonD. G.KroppP. R. (2000). A review of domestic violence risk instruments. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1, 171-181.
11.
GoodmanL. A.DuttonM. A.BennettL. (2000). Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 63-74.
12.
GoralskiC. S. (2013). Domestic violence: Firearm seizures & lethality assessments: Enhancing the police response. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice, and Principles, 86, 235-248.
13.
HansonR. K. (2005). Twenty years of progress in violence risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 212-217.
HoyleC. (2008). Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence cases. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 323-337.
16.
JohnsonM. E. (2010). Balancing liberty, dignity, and safety: The impact of domestic violence lethality screening. Cardozo Law Review, 32, 519-580.
17.
JohnsonD. M.WorellJ.ChandlerR. K. (2005). Assessing psychological health and empowerment in women: The Personal Progress Scale Revised. Women & Health, 41, 109-129.
18.
KleinA. R. (2012). Lethality assessments and the law enforcement response to domestic violence. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 12, 87-102.
19.
KroppP. R. (2004). Some questions regarding spousal assault risk assessment. Violence Against Women, 10, 676-697.
20.
Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence. (2009, Spring). MNADV newsletter: Reading the signs.
21.
Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence. (2011). Lethality Assessment Program Maryland model for first responders: Learning to read the danger signs.
McFarlaneJ.MalechaA.GistJ.WatsonK.BattenE.HallI.SmithS. (2004). Increasing the safety-promoting behaviors of abused women. American Journal of Nursing, 104, 40-51.
25.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C. (2016). Informing collaborative interventions: Intimate partner violence risk assessment for front line police officers. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 10, 328-340.
26.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.BrownS.PatchellB.AndroffD. K.WilsonJ. S. (2014). The association between protective actions and homicide risk: Findings from the Oklahoma Lethality Assessment Study. Violence and Victims, 29, 543-563.
27.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.Ward-LasherA.BrownS.PatchellB.WilsonJ. S. (2016). The Lethality Assessment Program: Which survivors of intimate partner violence are most likely to participate?Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39, 64-77.
28.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.WebsterD. W.BrownS.PatchellB.WilsonJ. S. (2015). The Oklahoma Lethality Assessment Study: A quasi-experimental evaluation of the Lethality Assessment Program. Social Service Review, 89, 499-530.
29.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.WilsonJ. S.BrownS.PatchellB. (2017). The lethality screen: The predictive validity of an intimate partner violence risk assessment for use by first responders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 205-226.
30.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.WilsonJ. S.BrownS.PatchellB.ShallC. (2014, July). Police departments’ use of the Lethality Assessment Program: A quasi-experimental evaluation (Final Report No. NCJ-.247456). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
31.
MessingJ. T.CiminoA.CampbellJ. C.BrownS.PatchellB.WilsonJ. S. (2011). Collaborating with police departments: Recruitment in the Oklahoma Lethality Assessment (OK-LA) study. Violence Against Women, 17, 163-176.
32.
MessingJ. T.ThallerJ. (2013). The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1537-1558.
33.
NichollsT. L.PritchardM. M.ReevesK. A.HiltermanE. (2013). Risk assessment in intimate partner violence: A systematic review of contemporary approaches. Partner Abuse, 4, 76-168.
34.
PiqueroA. R.BrameR.FaganJ.MoffittT. E. (2006). Assessing the offending activity of criminal domestic violence suspects: Offense specialization, escalation, and de-escalation evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Public Health Reports, 121, 409-418.
35.
RobinsonA. L.RowlandsJ. (2009). Assessing and managing risk among different victims of domestic abuse: Limits of a generic model of risk assessment?Security Journal, 22, 190-204.
36.
StoreyJ. E.HartS. D. (2014). An examination of the danger assessment as a victim-based risk assessment instrument for lethal intimate partner violence. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 1, 56-66.
37.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
