Using data from in-depth interviews with 38 U.S. service-women, this article explores women’s responses to sexual harassment in the military workplace. I argue that in an extremely gendered and masculine institution, sexual harassment threatens service-women’s identities as military insiders, presenting an identity dilemma for them. To resolve this dilemma, women prioritize their masculinity and downplay and excuse harassment. In contrast, service-women who have experienced sexual assault or combat confront sexual harassment. I argue that this is possible because for these two groups of women, sexual harassment does not present an identity dilemma. I show how masculinity is used to downplay and normalize harassment as well as to resist it.
AckerJ. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 565-570.
2.
AckerJ. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441-464.
3.
AntecolH.Cobb-ClarkD. (2001). Men, women and sexual harassment in the U.S. military. Gender Issues, 19, 3-18.
4.
ArcherE. (2012). The power of gendered stereotypes in the US marine corps. Armed Forces & Society, 39, 359-391.
5.
ArmstrongE.HamiltonL.ArmstrongE.Lotus SeelyJ. (2014). “Good girls”: Gender, social class, and slut discoruse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 100-122.
6.
BarrettF. (1996). The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US navy. Gender, Work & Organization, 3, 129-142.
7.
Bayard de VoloL.HallL. (2015). “I wish all the ladies were holes in the road”: The U.S. Air Force academy and the gendered continuum of violence. Signs, 40, 865-889.
8.
Beauboeuf-LafontantT. (2007). “You have to show strength”: An exploration of gender, race, and depression. Gender & Society, 21, 28-51.
9.
BonnesS. (2017). The bureaucratic harassment of U.S. servicewomen. Gender & Society, 31, 804-829.
10.
BostockD. J.DaleyJ. (2007). Lifetime and current sexual assault and harassment victimization rates of active-duty United States air force women. Violence Against Women, 13, 927-944.
11.
BullockC.BecksonM. (2011). Male victims of sexual assualt: Phenomenology, psychology, physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry Law, 39, 197-205.
12.
BurdettF.GouliquerL.PoulinC. (2018). Culture of corrections: The experiences of women correctional officers. Feminist Criminology, 13, 329-349.
13.
CallahanJ. (2009). Manifestations of power and control: Training as the catalyst for scandal at the United States air force academy. Violence Against Women, 15, 1149-1168.
14.
CastA. (2003). Power and the ability to define the situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 185-201.
15.
ChappellA.Lanza-KaduceL. (2010). Police academy socialization: Understanding the lessons learned in a paramilitary-bureaucratic organization. Jounral of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 187-214.
CharmazK. (2000). Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
19.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
CohnC. (2000). How can she claim equal rights when she doesn’t have to do as many push-ups as I do? The framing of men’s opposition to women’s equality in the military. Men and Masculinities, 3, 131-151.
21.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
22.
CollinsP. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York: Routledge.
23.
ConnellR. (2005a). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original work published 1995).
24.
ConnellR. (2005b). The social organization of masculinity. In ConnellR. (Ed.), Masculinities (2nd ed.) (pp. 67-88). Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
ConnellR.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender &. Society, 19, 829-859.
26.
CromwellP.ThurmanQ. (2003). The devil made me do it: Use of neutralization by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior, 24, 535-550.
27.
CrowleyK.SandhoffM. (2016). Just a girl in the army: U.S. Iraq war veterans negotiating femininity in a culture of masculinity. Armed Forces & Society, 43, 221-237.
28.
DunivinK. (1994). Military culture: Change and continuity. Armed Forces & Society, 20, 531-547.
29.
DunnJ. (2005). “Victims” and “survivors”: Emerging vocabularies of motive for “battered women who stay.”Sociological Inquiry, 75(1), 1-30.
30.
DunnJ. (2010). Judging victims: Why we stigmatize survivors and how they reclaim respect. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
31.
DunnJ.CreekS. J. (2015). Identity dilemmas: Toward a more situated understanding. Symbolic Interaction, 38, 261-284.
32.
EmersonR. (2001). Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
33.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
EsterbergK. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
35.
EzzellM. (2009). Barbie dolls on the pitch: Identity work, defensive othering and inequality in women’s rugby. Social Problems, 56, 111-131.
36.
FineM.WeisL.WeseenS.WongL. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research representations and social responsibilities. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook for qualitative research (pp. 107-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
FirestoneJ.HarrisR. (2009). Sexual harassment in the U.S. miltiary reserve component: A preliminary analaysis. Armed Forces & Society, 36, 86-102.
38.
FrenchS. (2003). Reflections on healing: Framing strategies utilized by acquaintance rape survivors. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 298-319.
39.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
40.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
41.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
HaleH. (2008). The development of British military masculinities through symbolic resources. Culture and Psychology, 14, 305-332.
43.
HaleH. (2012). The role of practice in the development of military masculinities. Gender, Work & Organization, 19, 699-722.
44.
HarrisonD. (2003). Violence in the military community. In HigateP. (Ed.), Military masculinities: Identity and the state (pp. 71-90). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
45.
HayM.EligT. (1999). The 1995 Department of Defense sexual harassment survey: Overview and methodology. Military Psychology, 11, 233-242.
46.
HigateP.CameronA. (2006). Reflexivity and researching the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 219-233.
47.
HinojosaR. (2010). Doing hegemony: Military, men, and constructing a hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Men’s Studies, 18, 179-194.
48.
HlavkaH. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: Young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society, 28, 337-358.
49.
HockeyJ. (2003). No more heroes: Masculinity in the infantry. In HigateP. (Ed.), Military masculinities: Identity and the state (pp. 15-25). Westport, CT: Praeger.
50.
HoytT.Klosterman RielageJ.WilliamsL. F. (2011). Military sexual trauma in men: A review of reported rates. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 12, 244-260.
51.
JeffreysS. (2007). Double jeopardy: Women, the US military and the war in Iraq. Women’s Studies International Forum, 30, 16-25.
52.
KandiyotiD. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2, 274-290.
53.
KanterR. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
54.
KleinmanS. (2007). Feminist fieldwork analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
55.
LoflandJ.SnowD.AndersonL.LoflandL. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
56.
MessnerM. (2002). Taking the field: Women, men, and sports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
57.
MillerJ.BrunsonR. (2000). Gender dynamics in youth gangs: A comparison of males’ and females’ accounts. Justice Quarterly, 17, 419-448.
58.
PayneE. (2010). Sluts: Heteronormative policing in the stories of lesbian youth. Educational Studies, 46, 317-336.
59.
PykeK.DangT. (2003). “FOB” and “whitewashed”: Identity and internalized racism among second generation Asian Americans. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 147-172.
60.
RubinH.RubinI. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
SadlerA.BoothB.CookB.DoebbelingB. (2003). Factors associated with women’s risk of rape in the military environment. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43, 262-273.
62.
Sasson-LevyO. (2003). Military, masculinity and citizenship: Tensions and contradictions in the experience of blue-collar soldiers’ identities. Global Studies in Culture and Power, 10, 319-345.
63.
Sasson-LevyO. (2011a). The military in a globalized environment: Perpetuating an extremely gendered organization. In JeanesE.KnightsD.MartinP. Y. (Eds.), Handbook of gender, work and organization (pp. 391-411). Maldon, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
64.
Sasson-LevyO. (2011b). Research on gender and the military in Israel: From a gendered organization to inequality regimes. Israel Studies Review, 26, 73-98.
65.
SchrockD.SchwalbeM. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277-295.
66.
SchwalbeM.GodwinS.HoldenD.SchrockD.ThompsonS.WolkomirM. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactions analysis. Social Forces, 79, 419-452.
67.
SchwalbeM.Mason-SchrockD. (1996). Identity work as group process. In MarkovskyB.LovagliaM.SimonR. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 113-147), Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
68.
ScottM.LymanS. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 31, 46-62.
69.
ScullyD.MarollaJ. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motives: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530-544.
70.
SilvaJ. (2008). A new generation of women? How female ROTC cadets negotiate the tension between masculine military culture and traditional femininity. Social Forces, 87, 937-959.
71.
SimsC.DrasgowF.FitzgeraldL. (2005). The effects of sexual harassment on turnover in the military: Time-dependent modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1141-1152.
72.
SnowD.AndersonL. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1336-1371.
73.
SteidlC.BrookshireA. (2018). Just one of the guys until shower time: How symbolic embodiment threatens women’s inclusion in the US military. Gender, Work, and Organization, 1-18.
74.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
StrykerS. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing.
76.
StrykerS.BurkeP. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284-297.
77.
TillmanS.Bryant-DavisT.SmithK.MarksA. (2010). Shattering silence: Exploring barriers to disclose for African American sexual assault survivors. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 11(2), 59-70.
78.
U.S. Department of Defense. (2019). Annual report on sexual assault in the military. Retrieved from https://www.sapr.mil/reports
79.
VerweijD. (2007). Comrades of friends? On friendship in the armed forces. Journal of Military Ethics, 6, 280-291.
80.
WassermanV.DayanI.Ben-AriE. (2018). Upgraded masculinity: A gendered analysis of the debriefing in the Israeli air force. Gender & Society, 32, 228-251.
81.
WeissK. G. (2009). “Boys will be boys” and other gendered accounts: An exploration of victims’ excuses and justifications for unwanted sexual contact and coercion. Violence Against Women, 15, 810-834.
WoodwardR.JenkingsN. (2011). Military identities in the situated accounts of British military personnel. Sociology, 45, 252-268.
84.
YoderJ. D.BerendsenL. L. (2003). “Outsider within” the firehouse: African American and white women firefighters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 27-36.
