Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the frequency, nature, and effects of coerced debt, defined as non-consensual, credit-related transactions that occur in intimate relationships where one partner uses coercive control to dominate the other. The sample includes 1,823 women who called the National Domestic Violence Hotline. Results suggest that coerced debt, from both coercive and fraudulent transactions, is a common problem and is significantly related to control over financial information, credit damage, and financial dependence on the abuser. This study supports the need for policy reform and victim services aimed at addressing coerced debt, thereby mitigating a potentially significant economic barrier to safety.

Keywords

intimate partner violence economic abuse coerced debt financial dependence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

A. E.

Sullivan

C. M.

Bybee

Greeson

M. R.

(2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women, 14, 563-588. doi:10.1177/1077801208315529

Aguirre

B. E.

(1985). Why do they return? Abused wives in shelters. Social Work, 30, 350-354. doi:10.1093/sw/30.4.350

Anderson

D. K.

Saunders

D. G.

(2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 163-191. doi:10.1177/1524838002250769

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

, et al. (2010). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 Summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf

Brewster

M. P.

(2003). Power and control dynamics in prestalking and stalking situations. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 207-217. doi:10.1023/a:1024064214054

Dutton

M. A.

Goodman

L. A.

(2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52, 743-756. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6

Dutton

M. A.

Goodman

L. A.

Schmidt

R. J.

(2006). Development and validation of a coercive control measure for intimate partner violence: Final technical report. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/214438.pdf

Johnson

I. M.

(1992). Economic, situational, and psychological correlates of the decision-making process of battered women. Families in Society, 73(3), 168-176. doi:10.1177/104438949207300305

Johnson

M. P.

(2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003-1018. doi:10.1177/1077801206293328

10.

Kim

Gray

K. A.

(2008). Leave or stay? Battered women’s decision after intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1465-1482. doi:10.1177/0886260508314307

11.

Littwin

(2012). Coerced debt: The role of consumer credit in domestic violence. California Law Review, 100, 1-74. doi:10.15779/Z38vr6g

12.

Littwin

(2013). Escaping battered credit: A proposal for repairing credit reports damaged by domestic violence. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 363. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=penn_law_review

13.

Matlow

R. B.

DePrince

A. P.

(2015). The impact of appraisals and context on readiness to leave a relationship following intimate partner abuse. Violence Against Women, 21, 1043-1064. doi:10.1177/1077801215590668

14.

Pence

Dasgupta

S. D.

(2006). Re-examining “battering”: Are all acts of violence against intimate partners the same. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.ncdsv.org/images/Praxis_ReexaminingBattering_June2006.pdf

15.

Postmus

J. L.

Plummer

S. B.

McMahon

Murshid

N. S.

Kim

M. S.

(2011). Understanding economic abuse in the lives of survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 411-430. doi:10.1177/0886260511421669

16.

Sanders

C. K.

(2015). Economic abuse in the lives of women abused by an intimate partner: A qualitative study. Violence Against Women, 21, 3-29. doi:10.1177/1077801214564167

17.

Sharp-Jeffs

Kelly

Klein

(2017). Long journeys toward freedom: The relationship between coercive control and space for action—Measurement and emerging evidence. Violence Against Women, 24, 163-185. doi:10.1177/1077801216686199

18.

Stark

(2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.

19.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute of Justice.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

The Frequency,Nature,and Effects of Coerced Debt Among a National Sample of Women Seeking Help for Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material