This article investigates the effects of firstborn sex on intimate partner violence (IPV) in India, taking into account heterogeneity across state sex ratios and maternal education. In states with masculine sex ratios of first births, firstborn daughters are found to elevate the risk and severity of IPV. The effects of firstborn daughters on sexual IPV are particularly pronounced among uneducated women in these states. These findings suggest that amid son preference at low birth orders, the sex of firstborn children can contribute to violence against mothers, providing new insights into the household reproduction of gender discrimination and violence.
AndersonS.RayD. (2010). Missing women: Age and disease. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1262-1300.
2.
AngristJ. D.EvansW. N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, 88, 450-477.
3.
ArnoldF.ChoeM. K.RoyT. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52, 301-315. doi:10.1080/0032472031000150486
4.
ArnoldF.KishorS.RoyT. K. (2002). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28, 759-785.
5.
BeydounH. A.BeydounM. A.KaufmanJ. S.LoB.ZondermanA. B. (2012). Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 959-975.
6.
BhattacharyaH. (2015). Spousal violence and women’s employment in India. Feminist Economics, 21(2), 30-52.
7.
BhattacharyaP. C. (2006). Economic development, gender inequality, and demographic outcomes: Evidence from India. Population and Development Review, 32, 263-291. doi:10.2307/20058874
8.
BhattacharyyaM.BediA. S.ChhachhiA. (2011). Marital violence and women’s employment and property status: Evidence from North Indian villages. World Development, 39, 1676-1689. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.001
9.
BlumbergR. L. (1984). A general theory of gender stratification. Sociological Theory, 2, 23-101.
10.
BongaartsJ. (2013). The implementation of preferences for male offspring. Population and Development Review, 39, 185-208. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00588.x
11.
BongaartsJ.PotterR. G. (1983). Fertility, biology, and behavior: An analysis of the proximate determinants. New York: Academic Press.
12.
BorooahV. K.IyerS. (2005). Religion, literacy, and the female-to-male ratio. Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 419-427. doi:10.2307/4416133
13.
BoseS.SouthS. J. (2003). Sex composition of children and marital disruption in India. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 996-1006. doi:10.2307/3599905
14.
ChenL. C.HuqE.D’SouzaS. (1981). Sex bias in the family allocation of food and health care in rural Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 7, 55-70.
15.
ChinY.-M. (2012). Male Backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction? Women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 175-200.
16.
CrowneS. S.JuonH.-S.EnsmingerM.BurrellL.McFarlaneE.DugganA. (2011). Concurrent and long-term impact of intimate partner violence on employment stability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1282-1304.
17.
Das GuptaM.BhatP. N. M. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51, 307-315.
18.
Das GuptaM.ShuzhuoL. (1999). Gender bias in China, South Korea and India 1920–1990: Effects of war, famine and fertility decline. Development and Change, 30, 619-652. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00131
19.
DeiningerK.GoyalA.NagarajanH. (2013). Women’s inheritance rights and intergenerational transmission of resources in India. Journal of Human Resources, 48, 114-141.
20.
Diamond-SmithN.LukeN.McGarveyS. (2008). “Too many girls, too much dowry”: Son preference and daughter aversion in rural Tamil Nadu, India. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 10, 697-708.
21.
DubeL. (1988). On the construction of gender: Hindu girls in Patrilineal India. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(18), WS11-WS19.
22.
DysonT. (2012). Causes and consequences of skewed sex ratios. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 443-461. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145429
GoodkindD. (1996). On substituting sex preference strategies in East Asia: Does prenatal sex selection reduce postnatal discrimination?Population and Development Review, 22, 111-125.
25.
GuilmotoC. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review, 35, 519-549. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00295.x
26.
HamoudiA.NoblesJ. (2014). Do daughters really cause divorce? Stress, pregnancy, and family composition. Demography, 51, 1423-1449.
27.
HarrisK. M.MorganS. P. (1991). Fathers, sons, and daughters: Differential paternal involvement in parenting. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 531-544. doi:10.2307/352730
KishoreA.SpearsD. (2014). Having a son promotes clean cooking fuel use in urban India: Women’s status and son preference. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 62, 673-699. doi:10.1086/676330
30.
KitzmannK. M.GaylordN. K.HoltA. R.KennyE. D. (2003). Child witnesses to domestic violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 339-352.
31.
KoolwalG. B. (2007). Son preference and child labor in Nepal: The household impact of sending girls to work. World Development, 35, 881-903. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.01.001
32.
LahiriS.SelfS. (2007). Gender bias in education: The role of inter-household externality, dowry and other social institutions. Review of Development Economics, 11, 591-606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9361.2007.00387.x
33.
LiL.WuX. (2011). Gender of children, bargaining power, and intrahousehold resource allocation in China. Journal of Human Resources, 46, 295-316.
34.
MayerP. (1999). India’s falling sex ratios. Population and Development Review, 25, 323-343. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00323.x
PandeR. (2003). Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: The role of siblings. Demography, 40, 395-418.
37.
PatelA.BadhoniyaN.MamtaniM.KulkarniH. (2013). Skewed sex ratios in India: “Physician, heal thyself.” Demography, 50, 1129-1134. doi:10.1007/s13524-012-0194-9
38.
PatelV.RodriguesM.DeSouzaN. (2002). Gender, poverty, and postnatal depression: A study of mothers in Goa, India. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 43-47.
39.
PuriS.AdamsV.IveyS.NachtigallR. D. (2011). “There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons”: A qualitative study of son preference and fetal sex selection among Indian immigrants in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1169-1176.
40.
QianN. (2008). Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1251-1285.
41.
RajA.SabarwalS.DeckerM.NairS.JethvaM.KrishnanS., et al. (2011). Abuse from in-laws during pregnancy and post-partum: Qualitative and quantitative findings from low-income mothers of infants in Mumbai, India. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15, 700-712. doi:10.1007/s10995-010-0651-2
42.
RidgewayC.CorrellS. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510-531.
43.
SabarwalS.SubramanianS. V.McCormickM. C.SilvermanJ. G. (2012). Husband’s preference for a son and women’s nutrition: Examining the role of actual and desired family composition on women’s anaemia and body mass index in India. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 26, 77-88. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01227.x
44.
SenA. (2010). More than 100 million women are missing. In MurthyP.SmithC. L. (Eds.), Women’s global health and human rights (pp. 99-112). London, England: Jones and Bartlett.
45.
SrinivasanS.BediA. S. (2007). Domestic violence and dowry: Evidence from a South Indian village. World Development, 35, 857-880. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.08.005
46.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316. doi:10.1177/019251396017003001
47.
SudhaS.RajanS. I. (1999). Female demographic disadvantage in India 1981–1991: Sex selective abortions and female infanticide. Development and Change, 30, 585-618.
48.
ThomasD. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 635-664.
49.
ThoratA. (2010). Ethnicity, caste and religion: Implications for poverty outcomes. Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 47-53.
50.
ThoratS.NeumanK. S. (2012). Blocked by caste: Economic discrimination in modern India. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
WeitzmanA. (2014). Women’s and men’s relative status and intimate partner violence in India. Population and Development Review, 40, 55-75. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00650.x
YamaguchiK. (1989). A formal theory for male-preferring stopping rules of childbearing: Sex differences in birth order and in the number of siblings. Demography, 26, 451-465.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
