Reducing Rape-Related Attitudes Utilizing a Cognitive Dissonance Paradigm

Abstract

This study used a cognitive dissonance mechanism that required college students to write essays dispelling previously endorsed rape myth beliefs. Results indicate that participants in the cognitive dissonance condition reported less rape myth endorsement at a 2-week follow-up than the control group. Effect sizes were large. The cognitive dissonance condition also led to more sustained internal motivation to respond in a nonsexist manner and earlier identification of sexually coercive behavior. Counter-attitudinal advocacy appears to result in sustained decreases in endorsement of rape-supportive attitudes, which could lead to safer communities for women by altering beliefs predictive of sexual assault perpetration.

Keywords

sexual assault prevention rape myth beliefs cognitive dissonance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbey

McAuslan

(2004). A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 747-756. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.747

Abbey

Parkhill

M. R.

Clinton-Sherrod

A. M.

Zawacki

(2007). A comparison of men who committed different types of sexual assault in a community sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1567-1580. doi:10.1177/0886260507306489

Anderson

L. A.

Whiston

S. C.

(2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374-388. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x

Bernat

J. A.

Calhoun

K. S.

Adams

H. E.

(1999). Sexually aggressive and nonaggressive men: Sexual arousal and judgments in response to acquaintance rape and consensual analogues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 662-673. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.662

Bohner

Jarvis

C. I.

Eyssel

Siebler

(2005). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men’s rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 819-828. doi:10.1002/ejsp.284

Bohner

Pina

Viki

G. T.

Siebler

(2010). Using social norms to reduce men’s rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 671-693. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.492349

Bohner

Siebler

Schmelcher

(2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men’s rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 286-297.

Breitenbecher

K. H.

(2000). Sexual assault on college campuses: Is an ounce of prevention enough? Applied and Preventive Psychology, 9, 23-52. doi:10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80036-8

Campbell

Raja

(2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97-106. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00171.x

10.

Cantor

Fisher

Chibnall

Townsend

Lee

Bruce

Thomas

(2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Rockville, MD: Association of American Universities.

11.

Casey

E. A.

Lindhorst

T. P.

(2009). Toward a multi-level, ecological approach to the primary prevention of sexual assault: Prevention in peer and community contexts. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 91-114. doi:10.1177/1524838009334129

12.

Davis

K. C.

Parrott

D. J.

George

W. H.

Tharp

A. T.

Hall

G. C.

Stappenbeck

C. A.

(2014). Studying sexual aggression: A review of the evolution and validity of laboratory paradigms. Psychology of Violence, 4, 462-476. doi:10.1037/a0037662

13.

DeGue

Valle

L. A.

Holt

M. K.

Massetti

G. M.

Matjasko

J. L.

Tharp

A. T.

(2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 346-362. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004

14.

Edwards

S. R.

Vogel

D. L.

(2015). Young men’s likelihood ratings to be sexually aggressive as a function of norms and perceived sexual interest. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16, 88-96. doi:10.1037/a0035439

15.

Eisenstadt

Leippe

M. R.

(2005). Dissonance and importance: Attitude change effects of personal relevance and race of the beneficiary of a counterattitudinal advocacy. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 447-467.

16.

Eisenstadt

Leippe

M. R.

Stambush

M. A.

Rauch

S. M.

Rivers

J. A.

(2005). Dissonance and prejudice: Personal costs, choice, and change in attitudes and racial beliefs following counterattitudinal advocacy that benefits a minority. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 127-141. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2702

17.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

18.

Festinger

Carlsmith

J. M.

(1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.

19.

Fisher

Daigle

Cullen

Turner

(2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6-38. doi:10.1177/0093854802239161

20.

Frazier

Valtinson

Candell

(1994). Evaluation of a coeducational interactive rape prevention program. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 153-158.

21.

Gannon

T. A.

Collie

R. M.

Ward

Thakker

(2008). Rape: Psychopathology, theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 982-1008. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.005

22.

Gidycz

C. A.

Warkentin

J. B.

Orchowski

L. M.

Edwards

K. M.

(2011). College men’s perceived likelihood to perpetrate sexual aggression. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20, 260-279.

23.

Katz

Moore

(2013). Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 28, 1054-1067. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00113

24.

Klonis

S. C.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

(2005). Internal and external motivation to respond without sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1237-1249. doi:10.1177/0146167205275304

25.

Koss

M. P.

Gidycz

C. A.

Wisniewski

(1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162

26.

Leippe

M. R.

Eisenstadt

(1994). The generalization of dissonance reduction: Decreasing prejudice through induced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 395-413.

27.

Loh

C. A.

Gidycz

C. A.

Lobo

T. R.

Luthra

(2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1325-1348. doi:10.1177/0886260505278528

28.

McMahon

Banyard

V. L.

(2011). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 3-14. doi:10.1177/1524838011426015

29.

McMahon

Farmer

G. L.

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71-81. doi:10.1093/swr/35.2.71

30.

McNally

A. M.

Palfai

T. P.

Kahler

C. W.

(2005). Motivational interventions for heavy drinking college students: Examining the role of discrepancy-related psychological processes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 79-87. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.79

31.

Messman-Moore

T. L.

Brown

A. L.

(2006). Risk perception, rape, and sexual revictimization: A prospective study of college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 159-172.

32.

Orchowski

L. M.

Untied

A. S.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2013). Social reactions to disclosure of sexual victimization and adjustment among survivors of sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2005-2023. doi:10.1177/0886260512471085

33.

Paul

L. A.

Gray

M. J.

(2011). Sexual assault programming on college campuses: Using social psychological belief and behavior change principles to improve outcomes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12, 99-109. doi:10.1177/1524838010390710

34.

Paul

L. A.

Walsh

McCauley

J. L.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Resnick

H. S.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

(2013). College women’s experiences with rape disclosure: A National Study. Violence Against Women, 19, 486-502. doi:10.1177/1077801213487746

35.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

36.

Stewart

D. N.

Jacquin

K. M.

(2010). Juror perceptions in a rape trial: Examining the complainant’s ingestion of chemical substances prior to sexual assault. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19, 853-874. doi:10.1080/10926771.2011.522951

37.

Stone

Aronson

Crain

A. L.

Winslow

M. P.

Fried

C. B.

(1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116-128. doi:10.1177/0146167294201012

38.

Thompson

M. P.

Swartout

K. M.

Koss

M. P.

(2013). Trajectories and predictors of sexually aggressive behaviors during emerging adulthood. Psychology of Violence, 3, 247-259. doi:10.1037/a0030624

39.

Yeater

E. A.

O’Donohue

(1999). Sexual assault prevention programs: Current issues, future directions, and the potential efficacy of interventions with women. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 739-771. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00075-0