While a negative relationship between rape myth acceptance (RMA) and bystander behavior is established, the specific myths associated with bystander behavior are not well understood. In Study 1, we presented 260 participants with vignettes manipulating clothing and alcohol intake of a woman victim to see how it affected intention to help. In Study 2, we presented 247 participants with similar vignettes, manipulating alcohol intake and relationship with the bystander. Contrary to previous research on RMA, participants were significantly more willing to intervene if the woman was intoxicated. Intervention also depended upon the participants’ relationship to the woman: stranger or acquaintance.
AndersonK. B.CooperH.OkamuraL. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 295-315.
2.
AosvedA. C.LongP. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481-492.
3.
BanyardV. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23, 83-97.
4.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M. (2011). Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students. Psychology of Violence, 1, 287-301.
5.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.CaresA. C.WarnerR. (2014). How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses. Psychology of Violence, 4, 101-115.
6.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463-481.
7.
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 61-79.
8.
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2005). Rape prevention through bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. NCJRS.
9.
BatsonD. C.EklundJ. K.ChermokV. L.HoytJ. L.OrtizB. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 65-74.
10.
BennettS.BanyardV. L. (2016). Do friends really help friends? The effect of relational factors and perceived severity on bystander perception of sexual violence. Psychology of Violence, 6, 64-72.
11.
BennettS.BanyardV. L.EdwardsK. M. (2017). The impact of the bystander’s relationship with the victim and the perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 682-702.
12.
BriereJ.MalamuthN.CheckJ. V. P. (1985). Sexuality and rape-supportive beliefs. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 398-403.
13.
BurnS. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779-792.
14.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
15.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
16.
CahoonD. D.EdmondsE. M. (1989). Male-female estimates of opposite-sex first impressions concerning females’ clothing styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 280-281.
17.
CaseyE. A.OhlerK. (2012). Being a positive bystander: Male antiviolence allies’ experiences of “stepping up.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 62-83.
18.
CassidyL.HurrellR. M. (1995). The influence of victim’s attire on adolescents’ judgments of date rape. Adolescence, 30, 319-323.
19.
CokerA. L.FisherB. S.BushH. M.SwanS. C.WilliamsC. M.ClearE. R.DeGueS. (2015). Evaluation of the green dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21, 1507-1527.
20.
CowanG.QuintonW. J. (1997). Cognitive style and attitudinal correlates of the perceived causes of rape scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 227-245.
21.
EdwardsK. K.TurchikJ.DardisC.ReynoldsN.GidyczC. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761-773.
22.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (Research report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
FriereP. (1974). Education as the practice of freedom. In FreireP. (Ed.), Education for critical consciousness (pp. 3-55). London, England: Continuum.
24.
GrubbA.TurnerE. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 443-452.
25.
HallE. R.HowardJ. A.BoezioS. L. (1986). Tolerance of rape: A sexist or antisocial attitude?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 101-118.
26.
HorvathM. A.BrownJ. (2006). The role of drugs and alcohol in rape. Medicine, Science and the Law, 46, 219-228.
27.
HorvathM. A.BrownJ. (2007). Alcohol as drug of choice: Is drug-assisted rape a misnomer?Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 417-429.
28.
KatzJ.PazienzaR.OlinR.RichH. (2015). That’s what friends are for: Bystander responses to friends or strangers at risk for party rape victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2775-2792.
29.
KrebsC.LindquistC.BerzofskyM.Shook-SaB.PetersonK.PlantyM.StroopJ. (2016, January). Campus climate survey validation study final technical report. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ccsvsftr.pdf
30.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31.
LevineM.CassidyC.BrazierG.ReicherS. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1452-1463.
32.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
33.
MaurerT. W.RobinsonD. W. (2008). Effects of attire, alcohol, and gender on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 58, 423-434.
34.
MilgramS. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
35.
MillerA. K.AmackerA. M.KingA. R. (2011). Sexual victimization history and perceived similarity to a sexual assault victim: A path model of perceiver variables predicting victim culpability attributions. Sex Roles, 64, 372-381.
36.
MoorA. (2007). When recounting the traumatic memories is not enough: Treating persistent self-devaluation associated with rape and victim-blaming rape myths. Women & Therapy, 30(1-2), 19-33.
37.
MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.CaresA. C.PotterS. J.WilliamsL. M.StapletonJ. G. (2015). Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: What program effects remain 1 year later?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 110-132.
38.
OsmanS. L. (2003). Predicting men’s rape perceptions based on the belief that “no” really means “yes.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 683-692.
39.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
40.
PetersonZ. D.MuehlenhardC. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51(3-4), 129-144.
41.
ScronceC. A.CorcoranK. J. (1995). The influence of the victim’s consumption of alcohol on perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape. Violence Against Women, 1, 241-253.
42.
ScullyD.MarollaJ. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530-544.
43.
SetoM. C.BarbareeH. E. (1997). Sexual aggression and antisocial behavior: A developmental model. In StoffD. M.BreilingJ.MaserJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 524-533). New York: John Wiley.
44.
SimsC. M.NoelN. E.MaistoS. A. (2007). Rape blame as a function of alcohol presence and resistance type. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2766-2775.
45.
SuarezE.GadallaT. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010-2035.
46.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
47.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
48.
UllmanS. E.KarabatsosG.KossM. P. (1999). Alcohol and sexual assault in a national sample of college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 603-625.
49.
WhatleyM. A. (2005). The effect of participant sex, victim dress, and traditional attitudes on causal judgments for marital rape victims. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 191-200.
50.
WorkmanJ. E.OrrR. L. (1996). Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 276-284.
51.
ZawackiT.AbbeyA.BuckP. O.McAuslanP.Clinton-SherrodA. M. (2003). Perpetrators of alcohol-involved sexual assaults: How do they differ from other sexual assault perpetrators and nonperpetrators?Aggressive Behavior, 29, 366-380.
52.
ZelinA. I.ErchullM. J.HoustonJ. R. (2015). Is everybody doing it? Perceptions and misperceptions of sexual behavior in the college freshman population. Gender Issues, 32, 139-163.
