Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current study assessed which bystander intervention behaviors individuals reported they would engage in when exposed to abuse in their online network and the correlates of these behaviors. Data were drawn from college students’ responses (N = 600) to three vignettes, ranging in severity, where the respondent’s male friend commented about his ex-girlfriend on a social network. Although it was hypothesized respondents would intervene on the website when exposed to abuse, results suggested this was not the case. Respondents were more likely to offer support to the victim, report the behavior, and recommend programming for the most severe scenario. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

bystander intervention social media cyberstalking intimate partner violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alegría-Flores

Raker

Pleasants

R. K.

Weaver

M. A.

Weinberger

(2015). Preventing interpersonal violence on college campuses: The effect of one act training on bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 1103-1126.

Alexy

Burgess

A. W.

Baker

Smoyak

S. A.

(2005). Perceptions of cyberstalking among college students. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 5, 279-289.

Allison

K. R.

Bussey

(2016). Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses’ responses to cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 183-194.

Banyard

V. L.

(2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23, 83-97.

Banyard

V. L.

Moynihan

M. M.

Plante

E. G.

(2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463-481.

Banyard

V. L.

Plante

E. G.

Moynihan

M. M.

(2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 61-79.

Banyard

V. L.

Plante

E. G.

Moynihan

M. M.

(2005). Rape prevention through bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention (Reported to the National Institute of Justice). Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/208701.pdf

Bastiaensens

Vandebosch

Poels

Van Cleemput

Desmet

DeBourdeaudhuij

(2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259-271.

Bennett

R. M.

Guran

Ramos

M. C.

Margolyn

(2011). College students’ electronic victimization in friendship and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims, 26, 410-429.

10.

Berkowitz

A. D.

(2002). Fostering men’s responsibility for preventing sexual assault. In Schewe

P. A.

(Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the lifespan (pp. 163-196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

11.

Björklund

(2016). Stalking and violence among university students. In Cowie

Myers

C. A.

(Eds.), Bullying among university students: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 76-90). New York: Routledge.

12.

Björklund

Häkkänen-Nyholm

Sheridan

Roberts

(2010). The prevalence of stalking among Finnish university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 684-698.

13.

Block

C. R.

(2003). How can practitioners help an abused woman lower her risk of death? National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 1-8.

14.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Basile

K. C.

Walters

M. L.

Chen

Merrick

M. T.

(2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63(SS08), 1-18.

15.

Buckley

Chapman

R. L.

(2016). Characteristics of adolescents who intervene to stop the risky and dangerous behavior of their friends. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 88, 187-193.

16.

Burn

S. M.

(2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779-792.

17.

Coker

A. L.

Bush

H. M.

Fisher

B. S.

Swan

S. C.

Williams

C. M.

Clear

E. R.

DeGue

(2015). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50, 295-302.

18.

Coker

A. L.

Cook-Craig

P. G.

Williams

C. M.

Fisher

B. S.

Clear

E. R.

Garcia

L. S.

Hegge

L. M.

(2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17, 777-796.

19.

Coyne

(2016). Commentary: What universities learn from workplace bullying research. In Cowie

Myers

C. A.

(Eds.), Bullying among university students: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 203-206). New York: Routledge.

20.

Darley

J. M.

Latané

(1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377-383.

21.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

MacLeod

(1997). Woman abuse: A sociological story. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harcourt Brace.

22.

Dempsey

A. G.

Sulkowski

M. L.

Nichols

Storch

E. A.

(2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychosocial adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 962-972.

23.

DeSmet

Veldeman

Poels

Bastiaensens

Van Cleemput

Vandebosch

De Bourdeaudhuij

(2014). Determinants of self-reported bystander behavior in cyberbullying incidents amongst adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 207-215.

24.

Duggan

Smith

(2014). Cell Internet use 2013. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Cell-Internet.aspx

25.

Farrell

Phillips

Pease

(1995). Like taking candy: Why does repeat victimization occur? British Journal of Criminology, 35, 384-399.

26.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2002). Being pursued: Stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 257-308.

27.

Foshee

V. A.

Linder

MacDougall

J. E.

Bangdiwala

(2001). Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence. Preventive Medicine, 32, 128-141.

28.

Fox

K. A.

Nobles

M. R.

Akers

R. L.

(2011). Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 39-47.

29.

Franklin

C. A.

Brady

P. Q.

Jurek

A. L.

(2017). Responding to gendered violence among college students: The impact of participant characteristics on direct bystander intervention behavior. Journal of School Violence, 16, 189-206.

30.

Freis

S. D.

Gurung

R. A.

(2013). A Facebook analysis of helping behavior in online bullying. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 11-19.

31.

Gahagan

Vaterlaus

J. M.

Frost

L. R.

(2016). College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: Conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1097-1105.

32.

Glauber

Randel

Picard

(2007). Tech abuse in teen relationships study. Fifth & Pacific Companies, Inc. (Formerly Liz Claiborne Inc.) Retrieved from https://www.breakthecycle.org/sites/default/files/pdf/survey-lina-tech-2007.pdf

33.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

34.

Grasmick

H. G.

Tittle

C. R.

Bursik

R. J.

Arneklev

B. J.

(1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.

35.

Jones

L. M.

Mitchell

K. J.

Turner

H. A.

(2015). Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: A national survey of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2308-2320.

36.

Kowalski

R. M.

Limber

S. P.

(2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22-S30.

37.

Latané

Darley

J. M.

(1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

38.

Lindsay

Booth

J. M.

Messing

J. T.

Thaller

(2016). Experiences of online harassment among emerging adults: Emotional reactions and the mediating role of fear. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 3174-3195. doi:10.1177/0886260515584344

39.

Logan

T. K.

(2010). Research on partner stalking: Putting the pieces together. Lexington: Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky.

40.

Lonsway

K. A.

(1996). Preventing acquaintance rape through education: What do we know? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 229-265.

41.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.

42.

Markey

P. M.

(2000). Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 183-188.

43.

McFarlane

J. M.

Campbell

J. C.

Watson

(2002). Intimate partner stalking and femicide: Urgent implications for women’s safety. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 51-68.

44.

McFarlane

J. M.

Campbell

J. C.

Wilt

Sachs

C. J.

Ulrich

(1999). Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies, 3, 300-316.

45.

McMahon

Banyard

V. L.

(2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 3-14.

46.

McMahon

Postmus

J. L.

Koenick

R. A.

(2011). Conceptualizing the engaging bystander approach to sexual violence prevention on college campuses. Journal of College Student Development, 52, 115-130.

47.

Mechanic

M. B.

Weaver

T. L.

Resick

P. A.

(2000). Intimate partner violence and stalking behavior: Exploration of patterns and correlates in a sample of acutely battered women. Violence and Victims, 15, 55-72.

48.

Moracco

K. E.

Runyan

C. W.

Butts

J. D.

(1998). Femicide in North Carolina, 1991-1993: A statewide study of patterns and precursors. Homicide Studies, 2, 422-446.

49.

Moynihan

M. M.

Banyard

V. L.

Arnold

J. S.

Eckstein

R. P.

Stapleton

J. G.

(2010). Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. Journal of American College Health, 59, 197-204.

50.

Myers

D. G.

(1999). Social psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

51.

National Center for Victims of Crime. (2007). The model stalking code revisited: Responding to the new realities of stalking. Stalking Resource Center. Retrieved from https://victimsofcrime.org/docs/default-source/src/model-stalking-code.pdf?sfvrsn=12

52.

Nobles

M. R.

Fox

K. A.

Piquero

A. R.

(2009). Career dimensions of stalking victimization and perpetration. Justice Quarterly, 26, 476-503.

53.

Nobles

M. R.

Reyns

B. W.

Fox

K. A.

Fisher

B. S.

(2012). Protection against pursuit: A conceptual and empirical comparison of cyberstalking and stalking victimization among a national sample. Justice Quarterly, 31, 986-1014.

54.

Obermaier

Fawzi

Koch

(2016). Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 18, 1491-1507.

55.

Olenik-Shemesh

Heiman

Eden

(2017). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal-socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 23-48.

56.

Orchowski

L. M.

Berkowitz

Boggis

Oesterle

(2015). Bystander intervention among college men: The role of alcohol and correlates of sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 2824-2846.

57.

Payne

B. K.

Chappell

(2008). Using student samples in criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 175-192.

58.

Pearce

(2016). The student voice. In Cowie

Myers

C. A.

(Eds.), Bullying among university students: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 17-20). New York: Routledge.

59.

Potter

S. J.

Moynihan

M. M.

Stapleton

J. G.

Banyard

V. L.

(2009). Empowering bystanders to prevent campus violence against women: A preliminary evaluation of a poster campaign. Violence Against Women, 15, 106-121.

60.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

(2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.

61.

Pratt

T. C.

Turanovic

J. J.

Fox

K. A.

Wright

K. A.

(2014). Self-control and victimization: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 52, 87-116.

62.

Reyns

B. W.

Englebrecht

C. M.

(2014). Informal and formal help-seeking decisions of stalking victims in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1178-1194.

63.

Reyns

B. W.

Henson

Fisher

S. W.

(2012). Stalking in the twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students. Deviant Behavior, 33, 1-25.

64.

Schreck

C. J.

Stewart

E. A.

Fisher

B. S.

(2006). Self-control, victimization, and their influence on risky lifestyles: A longitudinal analysis using panel data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 319-340.

65.

Scott

A. J.

Lloyd

Gavin

(2010). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in the United Kingdom and Australia. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1185-1194.

66.

Shariff

DeMartini

(2016). Cyberbullying and rape culture in universities: Defining the legal lines between fun and intentional harm. In Cowie

Myers

C. A.

(Eds.), Bullying among university students: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 172-190). New York: Routledge.

67.

Slaby

R. G.

Stringham

(1994). Prevention of peer and community violence: The pediatrician’s role. Pediatrics, 94, 608-616.

68.

Smith

(2014). Older adults and technology use. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.

69.

Southworth

Finn

Dawson

Fraser

Tucker

(2007). Intimate partner violence, technology, and stalking. Violence Against Women, 13, 842-856.

70.

Spitzberg

B. H.

Cupach

W. R.

(2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64-86.

71.

Spitzberg

B. H.

Hoobler

(2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4, 71-92.

72.

Stark

(2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.

73.

Stein

J. L.

(2007). Peer educators and close friends as predictors of male college students’ willingness to prevent rape. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 75-89.

74.

Sticca

Perren

(2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 739-750.

75.

Tharp

A. T.

DeGue

Valle

L. A.

Brookmeyer

K. A.

Massetti

G. M.

Matjasko

J. L.

(2013). A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 133-167.

76.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (Special Report No. NCJ 1669592). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

77.

Wiecko

F. M.

(2010). Research note: Assessing the validity of college samples: Are students really that different? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1186-1190.

78.

Woodlock

(2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23, 584-602. doi:10.1177/1077801216646277

Bystander Intervention to Abusive Behavior on Social Networking Websites

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References