This study qualitatively examines how heavy-drinking college men conceptualize bystander intervention. Twelve semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with college men reporting past-month heavy drinking and sexual activity within the past 2 months. NVivo software was used to conduct a thematic analysis. Following the stage model of bystander intervention, men in this sample described situations—predominantly in drinking contexts—when other men made sexual advances toward women who were not interested or who were intoxicated as opportunities for intervention. Men reported relying on women’s expression of verbal and nonverbal cues as a sign that a situation was problematic, and warranting intervention. Men reported a desire to protect women from experiencing a sexual assault, or to protect a peer from being accused of rape. Men perceived themselves to be more likely to assume responsibility for intervening when the situation involved someone they knew, especially a female friend. A variety of intervention strategies were also reported. Preliminary support was offered for considering alcohol myopia as a barrier to intervention. The interviews also provided preliminary support for further investigation into the role of alcohol expectancies regarding “liquid courage” and “aggression” as factors that can influence bystander intervention when intoxicated. Implications for future research and the development of tailored sexual assault prevention efforts for heavy-drinking men are discussed.
AbbeyA.Jacques-TiuraA. J.LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 450-464. doi:10.1002/ab.20399
2.
AbbeyA.WegnerR.WoernerJ.PegramS. E.PierceJ. (2014). Review of survey and experimental research that examines the relationship between alcohol consumption and men’s sexual aggression perpetration. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 15, 265-282. doi:10.1177/1524838014521031
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BanyardV. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83-97. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83
5.
BanyardV. L. (2011). Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1, 216-229. doi:10.1037/a0023739
6.
BanyardV. L. (2015). Toward the next generation of bystander prevention of sexual and relationship violence: Action calls to engage communities. New York: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.007/978-3-319-21371-6
7.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.CaresA. C.WarnerR. (2014). How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses. Psychology of Violence, 4, 101-115. doi:10.1037/a0033470
8.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463-481. doi:10.1002/jcop.20159
9.
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 61-79. doi:10.1002/jcop.10078
10.
BaroneR. P.WolgemuthJ. R.LinderC. (2007). Preventing sexual assault through engaging college men. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 585-594. doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0045
11.
BasileK. C. (2015). A comprehensive approach to sexual violence prevention. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2350-2352.
12.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II (vol. 78, pp. 490-498). San Antonio.
13.
BennettS.BanyardV. L.GarnhartL. (2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 476-496. doi:10.1177/0886260513505210
14.
BerkowitzA. D. (2002). Fostering men’s responsibility for preventing sexual assault. In ScheweP. (Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships (pp. 163-196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10455-007
15.
BerkowitzA. D. (2003). Applications of social norms theory to other health and social justice issues. In PerkinsH.W. (Ed.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 259-279). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (2003). Foundations of qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and models. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
17.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
18.
BrownA. L.BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M. (2014). College students as helpful bystanders against sexual violence: Gender, race, and year in college moderate the impact of perceived peer norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 350-362.
19.
BrownA. L.Messman-MooreT. L. (2010). Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students’ willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 503-517. doi:10.1177/0886260509334400
20.
BurnS. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779-792. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5
21.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
22.
CarlsonM. (2008). I’d rather go along and be considered a man: Masculinity and bystander intervention. Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 3-17. doi:10.3149/jms.1601.3
23.
CaseyE. A.LindhorstT. P. (2009). Toward a multi-level, ecological approach to the primary prevention of sexual assault in peer and community contexts. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 91-114. doi:10.1177/1524838009334129
24.
CaseyE. A.OhlerK. (2012). Being a positive bystander: Male antiviolence allies’ experiences of “stepping up.”Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 62-83. doi:10.1177/0886260511416479
25.
ClappJ. D.ReedM. B.HolmesM. R.LangeJ. E.VoasR. B. (2006). Drunk in public, drunk in private: The relationship between college students, drinking environments and alcohol consumption. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32, 275-285.
26.
Clery Center for Security on Campus. (2012). Summary of the Jeanne Clery Act.
27.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.FisherB. S.SwanS. C.WilliamsC. M.ClearE. R.DeGueS. (2016). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50, 295-302. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034
28.
ConnorsG. J.O’FarrellT. J.CutterH. S.ThompsonD. L. (1986). Alcohol expectancies among male alcoholics, problem drinkers, and non-problem drinkers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 10, 667-671.
29.
DardisC. M.MurphyM. J.BillA. C.GidyczC. A. (2016). An investigation of the tenets of social norms theory as they relate to sexually aggressive attitudes and sexual assault perpetration: A comparison of men and their friends. Psychology of Violence, 6, 163-171.
30.
DraugalisJ. R.PlazaC. M. (2009). Best practices for survey research reports revisited: Implications of target population, probability sampling, and response rate. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73, Article142.
31.
EaglyA. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644-658.
32.
FabianoP. M.PerkinsH. W.BerkowitzA. D.LinkenbachJ.StarkC. (2003). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52, 105-112.
33.
FarrisC. A.TreatT. A.VikenR. J. (2010). Alcohol alters men’s perceptual and decisional processing of women’s sexual interest. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 427-432. doi:10.1037/a0019343
34.
FischerP.KruegerJ. I.GreitemeyerT.VogrincicC.KastenmüllerA.FreyD.... & KainbacherM. (2011). The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517.
35.
FlemingW. M.Wiersma-MosleyJ. D. (2015). The role of alcohol consumption patterns and pro-social bystander interventions in contexts of gender violence. Violence Against Women, 21, 1259-1283. doi:10.1177/1077801215592721
36.
FloodM. (2011). Involving men in efforts to end violence against women. Men and Masculinities, 14(3), 358-377. doi:10.1177/1097184X10363995
37.
GeorgeW. H.MarlattG. A. (1986). The effects of alcohol and anger on interest in violence, erotica, and deviance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 150-158. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.2.150
38.
GidyczC. A.OrchowskiL. M.BerkowitzA. D. (2011). Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 17, 720-742. doi:10.1177/1077801211409727
39.
GoldsmithD. J.FitchK. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23, 454-476. doi:10.1111/j.1468,2958.1997.tb00406.x
40.
GrahamK.BernardsS.Wayne OsgoodD.AbbeyA.ParksM.FlynnA.et al. (2014). “Blurred lines?” Sexual aggression and barroom culture. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 38, 1416-1424.
41.
GrazianD. (2007). The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as collective activity. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 221-243. doi:10.1525/si.2007.30.2.221
42.
HarfordT. C.WechslerH.SeibringM. (2002). Attendance and alcohol use at parties and bars in college: A national survey of current drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 726-733.
43.
HendlerR. A.RamchandaniV. A.GilmanJ.HommerD.W. (2011). Stimulant and sedative effects of alcohol. In SommerW., & SpanagelR. (Eds.), Behavioral neurobiology of alcohol addiction. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (vol. 13). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
44.
HiltonM. E. (1989). A comparison of a prospective diary and two summary recall techniques for recording alcohol consumption. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 1085-1092.
45.
HoxmeierJ. C.FlayB. R.AcockA. C. (2016). Control, norms, and attitudes differences between students who do and do not intervene as bystanders to sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1891/0886260515625503
46.
Jacques-TiuraA. J.AbbeyA.ParkhillM. R.ZawackiT. (2007). Why do some men misperceive women’s sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the confluence model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1467-1480. doi:10.1177/0146167207306281
47.
KahlorL. A.MorrisonD. (2007). Television viewing and rape myth acceptance among college women. Sex Roles, 56(11/12), 729-739.
48.
KatzJ. (1995). Reconstructing masculinity in the locker room: Mentors in violence prevention project. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 163-175. doi:10.17763/haer.65.2.55533188520136u1
49.
KoelschL. E.BrownA. L.BoisenL. (2012). Bystander perceptions: Implications for university sexual assault prevention programs. Violence and Victims, 27, 563-579. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.563
50.
KrebsC.LindquistC.BerzofskyM.Shook-SaB.PetersonK.PlantyM.... & StroopJ. (2016). Campus climate survey validation study: Final technical report. BJS, Office of Justice Programs.
51.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
52.
LaumannE. O.EllingsonS. E.MahayJ. E.PaikA. E.YoumY. E. (2004). The sexual organization of the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
LisakD.GardinierL.NicksaS. C.CoteA. M. (2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16, 1318-1334. doi: 10.1177/1077801210387747
54.
LeoneR. M.ParrottD. J.SwartoutK. M.TharpA. D. (2015). Masculinity and bystander attitudes: Moderating effects of masculine gender role stress. Psychology of Violence, 6, 82-90.
55.
LevineM.CrowtherS. (2008). The responsive bystander: How social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1429-1439.
56.
LockeB. D.MahalikJ. R. (2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking, and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 279-283. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.279
57.
LonswayK. A.ArchambaultJ.LisakD. (2009). False reports: Moving beyond the issue to successfully investigate and prosecute non-stranger sexual assault. Prosecutor, Journal of the National District Attorneys Association, 43, 10-22.
58.
MabryA.TurnerM. M. (2016). Do sexual assault bystander interventions change men’s intentions? Applying the theory of normative social behavior to predicting bystander outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 276-292.
59.
MacAndrewC.EdgertonR. B. (1969). Drunken comportment: A social explanation. Los Angeles: University of California.
60.
McMahonS. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3-11. doi:10.1080/07448481.2010.483715
61.
McMahonS.BanyardV. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 3-14. doi:10.1177/1524838011426015
62.
McMahonS.DickA. (2011). “Being in a room with like-minded men”: An exploratory study of men’s participation in a bystander intervention program to prevent intimate partner violence. Journal of Men’s Studies, 19, 3-18. doi:10.3149/jms.1901.3
63.
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2009). The bystander approach: Strengths-based sexual assault prevention with at-risk groups. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19, 1042-1065. doi:10.1080/10911350902990304
64.
McMahonS.PostmusJ. L.KoenickR. A. (2011). Conceptualizing the engaging bystander approach to sexual violence prevention on college campuses. Journal of College Student Development, 52, 115-130. doi:10.1353/csd.2011.0002
65.
MollenS.RimalcR. N.RuiteraR. A. C.JangdS. A.KokaG. (2013). Intervening or interfering? The influence of injunctive and descriptive norms on intervention behaviours in alcohol consumption contexts. Psychology & Health, 28, 561-578.
66.
MontemurroB.McClureB. (2005). Changing gender norms for alcohol consumption: Social drinking and lowered inhibitions at bachelorette parties. Sex Roles, 52, 279-288.
67.
National Institute On Alcohol Abuse And Alcoholism (NIAAA). (2005). Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician’s Guide, 2005 ed., NIH Publication NO. 05–3769. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health.
68.
NelsonJ. K.DunnK. M.ParadiesY. (2011). Bystander anti-racism: A review of the literature. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11, 263-284.
69.
NorrisJ.NuriusP. S.DimeffL. A. (1996). Through her eyes: Factors affecting women’s perception of and resistance to acquaintance sexual aggression threat. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 123-145.
70.
OrchowskiL. M.BerkowitzA.BoggisJ.OesterleD. (2016). Bystander intervention among college men: The role of alcohol and correlates of sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 2824-2846. doi:10.1177/0886260515581904
71.
OrchowskiL.M.BarnettN.BorsariB.ZlotnickC.OesterleD.MerrillJ.WoodM. (2017, June). Proximal effects of an integrated alcohol and sexual assault prevention program for heavy drinking college men. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Research Society on Alcoholism, Denver CO.
72.
OwenJ.FinchamF. D.MooreJ. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331-341.
73.
ParksK. A.ScheidtD. M. (2000). Male bar drinkers’ perspective on female bar drinkers. Sex Roles, 43, 927-941.
74.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative studies. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (pp. 652–676). 4th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
75.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76.
PennerL. A.DovidioJ. F.PiliavinJ. A.SchroederD. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103070141
77.
PfohlB.BlumN.ZimmermanM. (1997). Structured interview for DSM-IV personality: Sidp-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
78.
PinoN. W.Johnson-JohnsA. M. (2009). College women and the occurrence of unwanted sexual advances in public drinking settings. Social Science Journal, 46, 252-267.
79.
PittmanB.GueorguievaR.KrupitskyE.RudenkoA. A.FlanneryB. A.KrystalJ. H. (2007). Multidimensionality of the alcohol withdrawal symptom checklist: A factor analysis of the alcohol withdrawal symptom checklist and CIWA-Ar. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(4), 612-618.
80.
SchwartzB. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79-88. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.79
81.
SnowD. A.RobinsonC.McMcallP. (1991). “Cooling out” men in singles bars and nightclubs: Observations on the interpersonal survival strategies of women in public places. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19, 423-449.
82.
SteeleC. M.JosephsR. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia. Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921-933. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.45.8.921
83.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
84.
TestaM.ClevelandM. J. (2016). Does alcohol contribute to college men’s sexual assault perpetration? Between- and within-person effects over five semesters. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78(1), 5-13.
85.
TestaM.LivingstonJ. A. (2009). Alcohol consumption and women’s vulnerability to sexual victimization: Can reducing women’s drinking prevent rape? Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 1349-1376.
86.
ThompsonE. H.JrCraccoE. J. (2008). Sexual aggression in bars: What college men can normalize. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 82-96.
87.
Van CampT.HébertM.GuidiE.LavoieF.BlaisM. (2014). Teens’ self-efficacy to deal with dating violence as victim, perpetrator or bystander. International Review of Victimology, 20, 289-303.
88.
WarkentinJ. B.GidyczC. A. (2007). The use and acceptance of sexually aggressive tactics in college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 829–850. doi: 10.1177/0886260507301793
89.
White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault. (2014). Not alone: The first report of the White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/ovw/page/file/905942/download
