“I Don’t Know That I’ve Ever Felt Like I Got the Full Story”: A Qualitative Study of Courtroom Interactions Between Judges and Litigants in Domestic Violence Protective Order Cases

Abstract

One in three U.S. women has experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) and many seek domestic violence protective orders (DVPOs) for secondary IPV prevention. Because judges have considerable autonomy making DVPO decisions, there is a need to describe how courtroom interactions and information available to judges may influence DVPO dispositions. We conducted DVPO hearing observations and phone interviews with District Court Judges. Qualitative themes emerged that may influence judges’ decision making in DVPO hearings: case information availability, judge engagement level, and litigant credibility. Recommendations include more time for judges to review case files, IPV-related training for judges, and increased court advocate use.

Keywords

intimate partner violence violence and injury prevention judicial decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew-Brune

Moracco

K. E.

Person

C. J.

Bowling

J. M.

(2017). Domestic violence protective orders: A qualitative examination of judges’ decision-making processes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 1921-1942. doi:10.1177/0886260515590126

Ballou

Tabol

Liriano

Vazquez-Nuttall

Butler

Boorstein

B. W.

McGovern

(2007). Initial development of a psychological model for judicial decision making in continuing restraining orders. Family Court Review, 45, 274-286. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00143.x

Bell

M. E.

Perez

Goodman

L. A.

Dutton

M. A.

(2011). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17, 71-88. doi:10.1177/1077801210393924

Benitez

C. T.

McNiel

D. E.

Binder

R. L.

(2010). Do protection orders protect? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38, 376-385.

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

et al . (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf

Breiding

M. J.

Basile

K. C.

Smith

S. G.

Black

M. C.

Mahendra

R. R.

(2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/intimatepartnerviolence.pdf

Burke

Leben

(2008). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 44(1/2), 4-25.

Carlson

M. J.

Harris

S. D.

Holden

G. W.

(1999). Protective orders and domestic violence: Risk factors for re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 205-226. doi:10.1023/A:1022032904116

Cattaneo

L. B.

Goodman

L. A.

(2010). Through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence: The relationship between empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 481-502. doi:10.1177/0886260509334282

10.

Corbin

Strauss

(2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

DeJong

Burgess-Proctor

(2006). A summary of personal protection order statutes in the United States. Violence Against Women, 12, 68-88. doi:10.1177/1077801205277720

12.

Durfee

(2009). Victim narratives, legal representation, and domestic violence civil protection orders. Feminist Criminology, 4, 7-31. doi:10.1177/1557085108324961

13.

Finn

M. A.

(2013). Evidence-based and victim-centered prosecutorial policies. Criminology & Public Policy, 12, 443-472. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12049

14.

Gibbs

(2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781849208574

15.

Gist

McFarlane

Malecha

Fredland

Schultz

Wilson

(2001). Protection orders and assault charges: Do justice interventions reduce violence against women. American Journal of Family Law, 15(1), 59-71.

16.

Graneheim

U. H.

Lundman

(2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

17.

Greacen

J. M.

(2014). Self-represented litigants, the courts, and the legal profession: Myths and realities. Family Court Review, 52, 662-669. doi:10.1111/fcre.12118

18.

Holt

V. L.

Kernic

M. A.

Wolf

M. E.

Rivara

F. P.

(2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 16-21. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00576-7

19.

Hough

Zelon

(2008). Self-represented litigants: Challenges and opportunities for justice. The Judges’ Journal, 47, 30-32.

20.

Jones

(2012). Mainstreaming therapeutic jurisprudence into the traditional courts: Suggestions for judges and practitioners. Phoenix Law Review, 5, 753-775.

21.

Jordan

C. E.

Pritchard

A. J.

Wilcox

Duckett-Pritchard

(2008). The denial of emergency protection: Factors associated with court decision making. Violence and Victims, 23, 603-616. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.5.603

22.

Klein

A. R.

(2008). Practical implications of current domestic violence research, part III: Judges. National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://209.198.129.131/images/PracticalImplicationsofDVResearch_Judges_4-08.pdf

23.

Kothari

C. L.

Rhodes

K. V.

Wiley

J. A.

Fink

Overholt

Dichter

M. E.

et al . (2012). Protection orders protect against assault and injury: A longitudinal study of police-involved women victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2845-2868. doi:10.1177/0886260512438284

24.

Landsman

(2012). Pro se litigation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 231-253. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173911

25.

Logan

Walker

(2009). Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 675-692. doi:10.1177/0886260508317186

26.

Logan

Walker

Hoyt

(2012). The economic costs of partner violence and the cost-benefit of civil protective orders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1137-1154. doi:10.1177/0886260511424500

27.

Logan

Walker

R. T.

(2010). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper? Violence and Victims, 25, 332-348. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.332

28.

Lucken

Rosky

J. W.

Watkins

(2015). She said, he said, judge said: Analyzing judicial decision making in civil protection order hearings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2038-2066. doi:10.1177/0886260514552276

29.

Matta

(2010). Knowing the communities we serve. Court Review, 49, 14-22.

30.

Miles

Huberman

(1994). Matrix displays: Some rules of thumb. In Miles

Huberman

(Eds.), Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed., pp. 239-244). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Moracco

K. E.

Bowling

J. M.

(2015). Is intimate partner violence severity associated with obtaining a domestic violence protective order? Unpublishd manuscript.

32.

Moses

(2011). Grounds for objection: Causes and consequences of America’s pro se crisis and how to solve the problem of unrepresented litigants. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2011/06/pdf/objection.pdf

33.

Muhr

(2004). Atlas.ti (Version 7). Berlin, Germany: Scientific Software Development.

34.

Nichols-Hadeed

Cerulli

Kaukeinen

Rhodes

K. V.

Campbell

(2012). Assessing danger: What judges need to know. Family Court Review, 50, 150-158. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01436.x

35.

North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts. (2015). North Carolina statewide DVPO filing rates. Unpublished raw data.

36.

North Carolina General Assembly. (2005). North Carolina General Assembly Statutes. Chapter 50B Domestic Violence. Retrieved from http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/ByChapter/Chapter_50B.html

37.

Ptacek

(1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial responses. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

38.

Russell

(2012). Effectiveness, victim safety, characteristics, and enforcement of protective orders. Partner Abuse, 3, 531-552. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.4.531

39.

Sandelowski

(1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179-183. doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211

40.

Spradley

J. P.

(1980). Participant observation. Independence, KY: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.

41.

Thomas

(2001). Judicial demeanor and response in domestic violence court. Minneapolis, MN: WATCH. Retrieved from http://www.stopvaw.org/uploads/dvcourtmonitoringreport_henn_co_2001_resource.pdf

42.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). State and county quickfacts. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/wakecountynorthcarolina,durhamcountynorthcarolina,US/PST045216

43.

Wexler

(2013). The development of therapeutic jurisprudence: From theory to practice (Discussion Paper No. 13-51). Arizona Legal Studies, 68, 691-705.

44.

Zorza

(2003). The disconnect between the requirements of judicial neutrality and those of the appearance of neutrality when parties appear pro se: Causes, solutions, recommendations, and implications. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 17, 423-454.