A frame analysis was conducted on a Hong Kong newspaper to determine whether news coverage of female fatalities at the hands of their intimate partners was reported in conventional domestic violence ways or if there were culture-specific explanations. Overall, most coverage supported known views of domestic violence, justifying the perpetrator and categorizing the issue as isolated crime. However, a few stories highlighted the historical subordination of women under patriarchy in Confucianism as an important cultural factor. Findings have implications for the lack of generalization of the social problem, and the understanding of cultural and political power in Hong Kong society.
BarrettM. (1988). Women’s oppression today. New York: Verso.
2.
BouhoursB.BroadhurstR. (2015). Violence against women in Hong Kong: Results of the International Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 21, 1311-1329. doi:10.1177/1077801215593646
3.
BucquerouxB.SeymourA. (2015). A guide for journalists who report on crime and crime victims. Retrieved from http://www.mediacrimevictimguide.com
4.
BullockH.FraserK.WilliamsW. (2001). Media images of the poor. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 229-246. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00210
5.
CacciatoreM.ScheufeleD.IyengarS. (2016). The end of framing as we know it . . . and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 7-23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
6.
CarrageeK.RoefsW. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54, 214-233. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
7.
ChanK. L.BrownridgeD.TiwariA.FongD.LeungW.-C. (2008). Understanding violence against Chinese women in Hong Kong: An analysis of risk factors with a special emphasis on the role of in-law conflict. Violence Against Women, 14, 1295-1312. doi:10.1177/1077801208325088
8.
ChanY. C. (1997). Combating violence against women: Hindsight from a decade of news reports on family violence in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Journal of Social Work, 31, 83-96. doi:10.1142/S0219246297000077
9.
ChermakS. (1994). Body count news: How crime is presented in the news media. Justice Quarterly, 11, 561-582. doi:10.1080/07418829400092431
ColemanD. H.StrausM. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1, 141-157.
DruckmanJ. N.PetersonE.SlothuusR. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107, 57-79. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000500
18.
DuttonD. (1994). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims, 9, 167-182.
19.
EntmanR. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
20.
Ferrand BullockC. (2007). Framing domestic violence fatalities: Coverage by Utah newspapers. Women’s Studies in Communication, 30, 34-63. doi:10.1080/07491409.2007.10162504
21.
Ferrand BullockC.CubertJ. (2002). Coverage of domestic violence fatalities by newspapers in Washington State. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 475-499. doi:10.1177/0886260502017005001
22.
FlowerdewJ.LiD.TranS. (2002). Discriminatory news discourse: Some Hong Kong data. Discourse & Society, 13, 319-345.
23.
FreelonD. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20-33.
24.
GallinR. (1999). Wife abuse in the context of development and change: A case from Taiwan. In CountsD.BrownJ.CampbellJ. (Eds.), To have and to hit: Cultural perspectives on wife beating (pp. 252-260). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
25.
GamsonW. A.CroteauD.HoynesW.SassonT. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373-393. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002105
26.
GillespieL.RichardsT.GivensE.SmithD. (2013). Framing deadly domestic violence: Why the media’s spin matters in newspaper coverage of femicide. Violence Against Women, 19, 222-245. doi:10.1177/1077801213476457
27.
GilmartinC. (1990). Violence against women in contemporary China. In LipmanJ. N.HarrellS. (Eds.), Violence in China (pp. 203-225). New York: State University of New York Press.
28.
GitlinT. (1979). Prime time ideology: The hegemonic process in television entertainment. Social Problems, 26, 251-266. doi:10.2307/800451
29.
HänggliR. (2012). Key factors in frame building: How strategic political actors shape news media coverage. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 300-317. doi:10.1177/0002764211426327
30.
HayC. (1996). Narrating crisis: The discursive construction of the winter of discontent. Sociology, 30, 253-277. doi:10.1177/0038038596030002004
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
KrumbeinF. (2015). Media coverage of human rights in China. International Communication Gazette, 77, 151-170. doi:10.1177/1748048514564028
35.
LeeW. K. (2002). Gender ideology and the domestic division of labor in middle-class Chinese families in Hong Kong. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9, 245-260. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003851
36.
LeungL.-C. (2014a). Confucian welfare: A barrier to gender mainstreaming domestic violence policy in Hong Kong. In SungS.PascallG. (Eds.), Gender in East Asian welfare states: Confucianism or gender equality (pp. 114-136). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
LeungL.-C. (2014b). It’s a matter of trust: Policing domestic violence in Hong Kong. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 82-101. doi:10.1177/0886260513504645
38.
LeungL.-C. (2016). Deconstructing the myths about intimate partner violence: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in Hong Kong. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0886260516660298
39.
LiC. (2000). Confucianism and feminist concerns: Overcoming the Confucian “gender complex.”Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27, 187-200. doi:10.1111/0301-8121.00012
40.
LippmannW. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
PanZ.KosickiG. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
49.
PriceV.TewksburyD.PowersE. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002
RichardsT. N.GillespieL. K.SmithM. D. (2011). Exploring news coverage of femicide: Does reporting the news add insult to injury?Feminist Criminology, 6, 178-202. doi:10.1177/1557085111409919
52.
RyanC.AnastarioM.DaCunhaA. (2006). Changing coverage of domestic violence murders: A longitudinal experiment in participatory communication. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 209-228. doi:10.1177/0886260505282285
53.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
54.
SchneiderB. (2012). Sourcing homelessness: How journalists use sources to frame homelessness. Journalism, 13, 71-86. doi:10.1177/1464884911421573
55.
SmithM. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257-273.
56.
Social Welfare Department. (2017). Statistics on child abuse, spouse/cohabitant battering and sexual violence cases. Retrieved from http://www.swd.gov.hk/vs/english/stat.html
TangC. S.CheungF. M.ChenR.SunX. (2002). Definition of violence against women: A comparative study in Chinese societies of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 671-688. doi:10.1177/0886260502017006005
60.
TangC. S.-K. (1997). Psychological impact of wife abuse experiences of Chinese women and their children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 466-478. doi:10.1177/088626097012003010
61.
TangC. S.-K. (1999). Wife abuse in Hong Kong Chinese families: A community survey. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 173-191. doi:10.1023/A:1022028803208
62.
TangC. S.-K.WongD.CheungF. (2002). Social construction of women as legitimate victims of violence in Chinese societies. Violence Against Women, 8, 968-996. doi:10.1177/107780102400447096
63.
TangC. S.-K.WongD.CheungF.LeeA. (2000). Exploring how Chinese define violence against women: A focus group study in Hong Kong. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 197-209.
64.
TaylorR. (2009). Slain and slandered: A content analysis of the portrayal of femicide in crime news. Homicide Studies, 13(1), 21-49. doi:10.1177/1088767908326679
65.
TuchmanG. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Van DijkT. (1996). Power and the news media. In PaletzD. (Ed.), Political communication in action (pp. 9-36). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
68.
Van GorpB. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60-78.
69.
VliegenthartR.van ZoonenL. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26, 101-115. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838
70.
WelchM.FenwickM.RobertsM. (1997). Primary definitions of crime and moral panic: A content analysis of experts’ quotes in feature newspaper articles on crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 34, 474-494. doi:10.1177/0022427897034004004
The Women’s Commission. (2006). Women’s safety in Hong Kong: Eliminating domestic violence. Hong Kong: The Women’s Commission.
73.
XingjuanW. (1999). Why are Beijing women beaten by their husbands? A case analysis of family violence in Beijing. Violence Against Women, 5, 1493-1504. doi:10.1177/10778019922183480
