Is the End Really the End? Prevalence and Correlates of College Women’s Intentions to Return to an Abusive Relationship

Abstract

Fifty-six college women completed surveys before and after terminating an abusive, heterosexual dating relationship. Whereas 64% of women had contact with their abusive partner post break-up, only 14% reported a moderate to high likelihood that they would return. Intentions to return were prospectively predicted by fewer perceived quality of alternatives, and cross-sectional correlates of intentions to return were being single, shorter time since relationship termination, having contact with one’s abusive ex-partner, and social pressure to return. These data can be used to inform intervention and advocacy efforts and to guide future research.

Keywords

dating violence intimate partner violence returning college investment model social pressure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/074959789190020T

Ajzen

(2006). Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf

Ajzen

Fishbein

(1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Anderson

D. J.

(2003). The impact on subsequent violence of returning to an abusive partner. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34, 93-112. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/41603864

Anderson

M. A.

Gillig

P. M.

Sitaker

McCloskey

Malloy

Grigsby

(2003). “Why doesn’t she just leave?”: A descriptive study of victim reported impediments to her safety. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 151-155. doi:10.1023/A:1023564404773

Baker

P. L.

(1997). And I went back: Battered women’s negotiation of choice. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 26, 55-74. doi:10.1177/089124197026001003

Bell

M. E.

Goodman

L. A.

Dutton

M. A.

(2007). The dynamics of staying and leaving: Implications for battered women’s emotional well-being and experiences of violence at the end of a year. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 413-428. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9096-9

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

(2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Browne

Bassuk

S. S.

(1997). Intimate violence in the lives of homeless and poor housed women: Prevalence and patterns in an ethnically diverse sample. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67, 261-278. doi:10.1037/h0080230

10.

Dardis

C. M.

Kelley

E. L.

Edwards

K. M.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2013). A mixed-methodological examination of investment model variables among abused and nonabused college women. Journal of American College Health, 61, 36-43. doi:10.1080/07448481.2012.750609

11.

Edwards

K. M.

Gidycz

C. A.

Murphy

M. J.

(2011). College women’s stay/leave decisions in abusive dating relationships: A prospective analysis of an expanded investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1446-1462. doi:10.1177/0886260510369131

12.

Edwards

K. M.

Gidycz

C. A.

Murphy

M. J.

(2014). Leaving an abusive dating relationship: A prospective analysis of the investment model and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2908-2927. doi:10.1177/0886260514554285

13.

Edwards

K. M.

Kearns

M. C.

Gidycz

C. A.

Calhoun

K. S.

(2012). Predictors of victim-perpetrator relationship stability following a sexual assault: A brief report. Violence and Victims, 27, 25-32. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22455182

14.

Edwards

K. M.

Sylaska

K. M.

Barry

J. E.

Moynihan

M. M.

Banyard

V. L.

Cohn

E. S.

(2015). Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: A comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 580-600. doi:10.1177/0886260514535260

15.

Edwards

K. M.

Ullman

S. E.

(2016). Formative evaluation of a social support intervention to reduce disclosure recipients’ negative social reactions to victims’ disclosures. Sexual Assault Report, 19(3), 33-34.

16.

Fleury

R. E.

Sullivan

C. M.

Bybee

(2000). When ending the relationship doesn’t end the violence: Women’s experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6, 1363-1383. Retrieved from http://vaw.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Expartner.pdf

17.

Follette

V. M.

Polusny

M. A.

Bechtle

A. E.

Naugle

A. E.

(1996). Cumulative trauma: The impact of child sexual abuse, adult sexual assault, and spouse abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 25-35. doi:10.1007/BF02116831

18.

Furman

(1999). The role of peer relationships in adolescent romantic relationships. In Allen

N. B.

Sheeber

(Eds.) Adolescent emotional development and the emergence of depressive disorders (Vol. 29, pp. 133-154). New York: Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Adolescent-Emotional-Development-Emergence-Depressive/dp/0521869390/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1482006861&sr=8-1&keywords=Adolescent+emotional+development+and+the+emergence+of+depressive+disorders

19.

Gordon

K. C.

Burton

Porter

(2004). Predicting the intentions of women in domestic violence shelters to return to partners: Does forgiveness play a role? Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 331-338. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.331

20.

Griffing

Ragin

D. F.

Morrison

S. M.

Sage

R. E.

Madry

Primm

B. J.

(2005). Reasons for returning to abusive relationships: Effects of prior victimization. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 341-348. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-6611-8

21.

Griffing

Ragin

D. F.

Sage

R. E.

Madry

Bingham

L. E.

Primm

B. J.

(2002). Domestic violence survivors’ self-identified reasons for returning to abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 306-319. doi:10.1177/0886260502017003005

22.

Hegarty

Bush

Sheehan

(1999). The composite abuse scale: Further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings. Violence and Victims, 20, 529-547. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16248489

23.

Katz

Kuffel

S. W.

Brown

F. A.

(2006). Leaving a sexually coercive dating partner: A prospective application of the investment model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 267-275. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00295.x

24.

Lerner

C. F.

Kennedy

L. T.

(2000). Stay–leave decision making in battered women: Trauma, coping and self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 215-232. doi:10.1023/A:1005450226110

25.

Martin

A. J.

Berenson

K. R.

Griffing

Sage

R. E.

Madry

Bingham

L. E.

Primm

B. J.

(2000). The process of leaving an abusive relationship: The role of risk assessments and decision-certainty. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 109-122. doi:10.1023/A:1007515514298

26.

National Research Council. (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

27.

Resnick

Kilpatrick

Dansky

Saunders

Best

(1993). Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 984-991. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.6.984

28.

Rhatigan

D. L.

Street

A. E.

(2005). The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships: A test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1580-1597. doi:10.1177/0886260505280344

29.

Rhatigan

D. L.

Street

A. E.

Axsom

D. K.

(2006). A critical review of theories to explain violent relationship termination: Implications for research and intervention. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 321-345. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.09.002

30.

Ruback

R. B.

Thompson

M. P.

(2001). Social and psychological consequences of violent victimization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Rusbult

C. E.

(1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186. Available from carylrusbult.com

32.

Rusbult

C. E.

(1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101-117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101

33.

Rusbult

C. E.

Martz

J. M.

(1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558-571. doi:10.1177/0146167295216002

34.

Rusbult

C. E.

Martz

J. M.

Agnew

C. R.

(1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x

35.

Schutte

N. S.

Malouff

J. M.

Doyle

J. S.

(1988). The relationship between characteristics of the victim, persuasive techniques of the batterer, and returning to a battering relationship. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 605-610. doi:10.1080/00224545.1988.9922914

36.

Straus

M. A.

(2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790-811. doi:10.1177/107780120465552

37.

Straus

M. A.

Hamby

S. L.

Boney-McCoy

Sugarman

D. B.

(1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316. doi:10.1177/1077801204265552

38.

Strube

M. J.

(1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236-250. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.236

39.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161. doi:10.1177/10778010022181769